What Kind of Innovations Bring Transition from Local Agenda 21 to Local Agenda 2030?

Abstract

The foundations of the Local Agenda 21 process were laid in 1992 in line with the Agenda 21 resolutions of the United Nations Rio Summit. Millennium Development Goals were determined at the Sustainable Development Summit organized by the United Nations in 2000. A 15-year program has been created to achieve the goals aimed at achieving equality in the world in the context of ecological, economic and social sustainability. In 2015, the goals were evaluated and subject content and priorities were rearranged, and 2030 sustainable development goals were determined. 2030 agenda sets 17 goals for the new sustainable development agenda. This process opened up discussion on the preparation of a new Local Agenda. Thus, Local Agenda 2030s started to be restructured by countries by priorities in both regional and local development will be reorganized. The study aims to examine the Local Agenda 2030 process. It also aims to identify its differences from these two processes.

Keywords

• Local Governments
• 2030 Sustainable Development Goals
• Agenda 2030
• Local Agenda 2030
• Sweden LA2030

Project Number

Yok

Yerel Gündem 21'den Yerel Gündem 2030'a Geçiş Ne Tür Yenilikler Getiriyor?

Abstract

1992 yılında Birleşmiş Milletler Rio Zirvesinin Gündem 21 kararları doğrultusunda, Yerel Gündem 21 sürecinin temelleri atılmıştır. Birleşmiş Milletlerin 2000 yılında düzenlediği Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Zirvesinde, Binyıl Kalkınma Hedefleri belirlenmiştir. Ekolojik, ekonomik ve sosyal sürdürülebilirlik bağlamında dünyada eşitliği sağlamaya yönelik hedeflerin gerçekleşmesi için 15 yıllık bir program oluşturulmuştur. 2015 yılında hedefler değerlendirilmiş ve konu içerik ve öncelikleri yeniden düzenlenerek, 2030 sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedefleri belirlenmiştir. 2030 gündeminde yeni sürdürülebilir kalkınma ajandası için 17 hedef belirlenmiştir. Bu süreç, yeni bir Yerel Gündem hazırlanmasını tartışmaya açmıştır. Böylece hem bölgesel kalkınma hem yerel kalkınmada önceliklerin yeniden düzenleneceği Yerel Gündem 2030’lar ülkeler tarafından yeniden yapılandırılmaya başlanmıştır. Çalışma Yerel Gündem 2030 süreci üzerine bir incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Aynı zamanda iki sürecin farklılıklarını belirlemeyi hedeflemektedir.

Keywords

• Yerel Yönetimler
• 2030 Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Hedefleri
• Gündem 2030
• Yerel Gündem 2030
• İsveç YG2030

Supporting Institution

Yok

Project Number

Yok

Thanks

_

References

1. Akarçay, P. (2017). Local governments in Sweden. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5, 371-381.
2. Beals, G. C. (1993). Sustainable development: the options. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 3(1-3), 87-93.
3. Bostancı, S. H. (2011). Kent konseylerinin eko-belediyecilik vizyonuna katkıları. Kent Konseyleri Sempozyum Bildiri Kitabı, 250-264.
4. Bulut, Y., & Taniyici, S. (2006). Representativeness and attitudes of municipal council members in Turkey: The case of Erzincan province. Local Government Studies, 32(4), 413-428.
5. Coenen, F., Eckerberg, K., & Lafferty, W. M. (1999). Implementing local agenda 21 in Europe a cross-national analysis of 12 national reports'. In EURA Conference April 1999: Innovations in Urban Governance.
6. Coenen, F. (2009). Local agenda 21:‘meaningful and effective’participation?. In: Public participation and better environmental decisions (pp. 165-182). Springer, Dordrecht.
7. Eckerberg, K., & Dahlgren, K. (2007). Project or process? Fifteen years' experience with local agenda 21 in Sweden (English version) EKONOMIAZ. Revista vasca de Economía, 64(01), 124-141.
8. Emrealp, S. (1998). Yerel gündem 21, Öneri Dergisi, 2(10), 27-28.

9. Engstrom, R. E., Collste, D., Cornell, S. E., Johnson, F. X., Carlsen, H., Jaramillo, F., Finnveden, G., Destouni, G., Howells, M, Weitz, N., & Fuso-Nerini, F. (2020). Succeeding at home and abroad--accounting for the international spillovers of cities' SDG actions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.14153.
10. Evans, B., & Theobald, K. (2003). LASALA: Evaluating local agenda 21 in Europe. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46(5), 781-794.
11. Finkler, M. C. C., da Silva, P. R., Mueller, A. A., Brizolla, M. M. B., Nüske, M. A., Zanatta, J. M., & Thesing, N. J. (2020). Habitação social como oportunidade social e a importância para o desenvolvimento do município de Ijuí/RS. Research, Society and Development, 9(12), e17891210974-e17891210974.
12. Diaz-Sarachaga, J. M. (2019). Analysis of the local agenda 21 in Madrid compared with other global actions in sustainable development. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19), 3685.
13. Geissel, B. (2009). Participatory governance: Hope or danger for democracy? A case study of Local Agenda 21. Local Government Studies, 35(4), 401-414.
14. Görmez, K., & Altınışık, H. U. (2011). Yerel demokrasi ve kent konseyleri. Kent Konseyleri Sempozyum Bildiri Kitabı, 30-50.
15. Göymen, K. (1999). Türk yerel yönetiminde katılımcılığın evrimi: Merkeziyetçi bir devlette yönetişim dinamikleri. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 32(4), 67-83.
16. Government Office of Sweden (2018). The Government Adopts Sweden’s Action Plan for the 2030 Agenda. (Erişim: 27.2.2021), https://www.government.se/press-releases/2018/06/the-government-adopts-swedens-action-plan-for-the-2030-agenda/
17. Guerra, João, Luísa Schmidt, & Luiz Brito Lourenço. (2019). From local agenda 21 to a localized agenda 2030–the Portuguese and Brazilian cases in perspective. Community Development, 50(3), 352-367.
18. Jörby, S. A. (2002). Local agenda 21 in four Swedish municipalities: A tool towards sustainability?. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 45(2), 219-244.
19. Kaypak, Ş. (2011). Katılımcı yönetim mekanizması olarak kent konseyleri. Kent Konseyleri Sempozyum Bildiri Kitabı, 133-157.
20. Khan, J., Hildingsson, R., & Garting, L. (2020). Sustainable welfare in Swedish cities: Challenges of eco-social integration in urban sustainability governance. Sustainability, 12(383), 1-17.
21. Khakee, A. (2002). Assessing institutional capital building in a local agenda 21 process in Go’teborg. Planning Theory & Practice, 3(1), 53-68.
22. Lanshina, T., Barinova, V., Loginova, A., Lavrovsky E., & Ponedelnik I. (2019). Localizing and achieving the sustainable development goals at the national level: Cases of leadership. International Organisations Research Journal, 14(1), 207–224.
23. Lindborg, M. (2019). Making a global framework local: Challenges and opportunities in agenda 2030 localization. MSc Thesis. Linköpings Universitet, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
24. Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446-454.
25. McDermott, P. (2010). Building open government. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 401-413.
26. Moallemi, E. A., Malekpour, S., Hadjikakou, M., Raven, R., Szetey, K., Ningrum, D., Dhiaulhaq, A., & Bryan, B. A. (2020). Achieving the sustainable development goals requires transdisciplinary innovation at the local scale. One Earth, 3(3), 300-313.
27. Moallemi, E. A., Malekpour, S., Hadjikakou, M., Raven, R., Szetey, K., Moghadam, M. M., Bandari, R., Lester R., & Bryan, B. A. (2019). Local agenda 2030 for sustainable development. The Lancet Planetary Health, 3(6), e240-e241.
28. Özdemir, A. (2008). Yönetim biliminde ileri araştırma yöntemleri ve uygulamalar. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
29. Palm, K., & Lilja, J. (2020). On the road to Agenda 2030 together in a complex alliance of Swedish public authorities. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-17.
30. Picavêa, M. G., & dos Santos, F. B. P. (2020). Uma andorinha só não faz verão: importância da participação multistakeholder. Revista Brasileira de Casos de Ensino em Administração, 10(2), 14, 1-3.
31. Roberts, I. (2000). Leicester environment city: Learning how to make local agenda 21, Partnerships and Participation Deliver. Environment and Urbanization, 12(2), 9-26.
32. Selman, P., & Parker, J. (1997). Citizenship, civicness and social capital in local agenda 21. Local Environment, 2(2), 171-184.
33. Statistics Sweden (2017). Statistisk uppföljning av Agenda 2030. (Erişim: 20.3.2021), https://www.scb.se/contentassets/404caaf5c86740939115864265d2c95e/mi1303_2017a01_br_x41br1701.pdf
34. Statistics Sweden Regions and Environment Department (2020). Leaving no one behind Statistical review of the implementation of the 2030 Agenda in Sweden, October 2020. (Erişim: 20.3.2021), https://www.scb.se/contentassets/093a4e6ee4004071815a5ec6773012e7/mi1303_2020a01_br_x41br2101.pdf
35. Stanley, J. (2017). Habitat III and the new urban agenda. Planning News, 43(1), 19.
36. Swedish Public Report Series (SOU) (1997) Agenda 21 i Sverige. Fem aºr efter Rio—resultat och framtid (Agenda 21 in Sweden. Five Years after Rio), Final Report of the National Committee of Agenda 21, Swedish Public Report Series 1997:105 (Stockholm, Fritzes).
37. Szetey, K., Moallemi, E. A., Ashton, E., Butcher, M., Sprunt, B., & Bryan, B. A. (2021). Co-creating local socioeconomic pathways for achieving the sustainable development goals. Sustainability Science, 1-18.
38. The Swedish National Financial Management Authority. (Erişim: 20.3.2021), https://www.esv.se/english/
39. The Swedish Agency for Public Management. (Erişim: 20.3.2021), https://www.statskontoret.se/in-english/
40. UNDP Türkiye (2021a). Binyıl kalkınma hedefleri. (Erişim: 26.2.2021), https://www.tr.undp.org/content/turkey/tr/home/mdgoverview/overview/mdg1.html
41. UNDP Türkiye (2021b). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma amaçları. (Erişim: 26.2.2021), https://www.tr.undp.org/content/turkey/tr/home/sustainable-development-goals.html
42. Valencia, S. C., Simon, D., Croese, S., Nordqvist, J., Oloko, M., Sharma, T., Taylor Buck, N., & Versace, I. (2019). Adapting the sustainable development goals and the new urban agenda to the city level: Initial reflections from a comparative research project. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 11(1), 4-23.
43. Wild, A. ve Marshall, R. (1999). Participatory practice in the context of local agenda 21: A case study evaluation of experience in three english local authorities. Sustainable Development, 7(3), 151-162.