Investigation of Preschool Teacher Candidates' Views on Zero Waste

Öz

Individuals' perspectives and views on zero waste are important in terms of minimizing the damage to the environment and a sustainable world. At this point, especially the level of educators' understanding of sustainability and zero waste will directly affect the worldview of students, who are the individuals of the future. The aim of this study is to determine and examine the views of pre-service preschool teachers on the concept of zero waste. Within the scope of the study, the views of 83 pre-service preschool teachers on zero waste were examined in depth using an interview form, and the data were analyzed by creating codes and categories. Phenomenology, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the process. As a result of the study, it was determined that pre-service preschool teachers have limited knowledge about zero waste and sustainability. In addition, the fact that most pre-service teachers defined zero waste as recyclable waste indicates that there is an incomplete learning. It was determined that pre-service preschool teachers have limited knowledge and experience about reduce and reuse, which are recommended for a sustainable environment, and which take place before recycling in the zero waste hierarchy. Another important result was that pre-service preschool teachers prioritized especially plastic wastes in terms of recycling. In line with these results, it is recommended that these issues should be included in the education programmed for pre-service teachers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Preschool education
• preschool teacher candidates
• science education
• environmental education
• zero waste

Kaynakça

1. Altınok, G. (2021). Reflection of zero waste policy in environmental education on social studies lesson and research according to teacher opinions [Unpublished master's thesis]. Aksaray University Graduate School of Social Sciences.
2. Álvarez-García, O., Sureda-Negre, J., & Comas-Forgas, R. (2015). Environmental education in pre-service teacher training: A literature review of existing evidence. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 17(1), 72-85.
3. Atasoy, E., & Ertürk, H. (2008). A field study about envıronmental knowledge and attidudes of elementary school students. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 10 (1), 105-122.
4. Bagui, B. E., & Arellano, L. R. A. C. (2021). Zero waste store: a way to promote environment-friendly living. International Journal of Qualitative Research, 1(2), 150-155.
5. Bhoyar, S. P., Dusad, S., Shrivastava, R., Mishra, S., Gupta, N., & Rao, A. B. (2014). Understanding the impact of lifestyle on individual carbon-footprint. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 133, 47-60.
6. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. K. & Turner, L. A. (2015). Research methods, design and analysis. (Aypay, A. Translation Ed.). Anı Publishing.
7. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
8. Dal, Ş. & Okur Akçay, N. (2021). Determination of science teachers' views on sustainable development and zero. e- Kafkas Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 438-459.

9. Erdaş Kartal, E. & Ada, E. (2019). Pre-school teacher candidates' views about environmental problems and recycling. YYU Journal of Education Faculty, 16(1), 818-847.
10. Erten, S., & Köseoğlu, P. (2022). "Zero waste project" in secondary school science course books. National Education Journal, 51(234), 1085-1110.
11. Geden, O. (2018). Politically informed advice for climate action. Nature Geoscience, 11(6), 380-383.
12. Gül, M. & Yaman, K. (2021). Evaluation of waste management and zero waste project in Turkey: Case of Ankara. Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 35(4), 1267-1296.
13. Gülersoy, A. E., Dülger, İ., Dursun, E., Ay, D., & Duyal, D. (2020). What kind of environmental education? Some suggestions in the context of contemporary approaches. Electronic Turkish Studies, 15(5). 2357-2398. https://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.
14. Günşen, G. (2023). Investigation of the effect of environmental education activities on preschool teacher candidates' ecological footprint awareness and environmental awareness levels of interest. International Journal of Primary Education Studies, 4(1), 1-13.
15. Harman, G., & Çelikler, D. (2016). Awareness of science teacher candidates on recycling. Journal of Abant Social Sciences, 16(1), 331-333.
16. Harman, G., & Yenikalaycı, N. (2020). Awareness of preservice science teachers on zero waste approach. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 50, 138-161.
17. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (2021). Summary for policymakers. In VI, Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Pean, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. I. Gomis, J. B. R. Matthews, S. Berger, M. Huang, Ö. Yelekçi, R. Yu, B. Zhou, E. Lonnoy, T. K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, K. Leitzell, and N. Caud, (Eds.), Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Inter governmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_SPM_final.pdf
18. Keleş, Ö., & Aydoğdu, M. (2010). Pre-service science teachers' views on ways to reduce ecological footprints. Turkish Journal of Science Education, 7(3), 171-187
19. Kowasch, M. (2022). Circular economy, cradle to cradle and zero waste frameworks in teacher education for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(6), 1404-1425
20. Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Mónus, F. (2022). Environmental education policy of schools and socioeconomic background affect environmental attitudes and pro-environmental behaviour of secondary school students. Environmental Education Research, 28(2), 169-196.
22. Murley, L. D., Gandy, S. K., & Huss, J. M. (2017). Teacher candidates research, teach, and learn in the nation's first net zero school. The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(2), 121-129.
23. Onuoha, C. A., Ngobiri, N. C., Ochekwu, E. B., & Onuoha, P. (2022). A review on environmental challenges and responsiveness. Asian J Sci Technol, 13(05), 12100-12106
24. Önal, H., Kaya, N., & Çalışkan, T. (2019). Zero waste policy in environmental education and views of the existing textbooks (lıfe scıence 2nd grade textbook). National Education Journal, 48(221), 123-140.
25. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative social work, 1(3), 261-283.
26. Schouten, H., (2021). Climate policy on transport & mobility. advice 3 climate crisis policy team. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/2231660/climate-policy-on-transport-mobility/2989092/
27. Sivrikaya, Ş. (2018). Determination of ecological footprint awareness levels of prospective science and Turkish teachers [Master's thesis]. Akdeniz University Institute of Educational Sciences.
28. Song, Q., Li, J., & Zeng, X. (2015). Minimising the increasing solid waste through zero waste strategy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 104, 199-210.
29. Tezel, Ö., & Yıldız, E. (2020). World and Turkey encounter in sustainable waste management practices: The case of EDİKAB. Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(2), 35-48.
30. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Seçkin Publishing.
31. Yu, K. H., Zhang, Y., Li, D., Montenegro-Marin, C. E., & Kumar, P. M. (2021). Environmental planning based on reduce, reuse, recycle and recover using artificial intelligence. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 86, 106492.