IMPLICIT LEADERSHIP CONCEPT AND REFLECTION TO HEALTH INSTITUTIONS

Abstract

It is expressed as the person who collects the leader power, who has an impact on all processes of the organization and manages the processes. Implicit leadership emerges when other individuals in the group follow the person they want to see as the leader voluntarily (Eroğluer, 2014, p. 107).

The aim of this study is to examine the concept of implicit leadership which is not included in Turkish literature and to shed light on other studies. In addition, as in every institution, it is aimed to address the existing leadership concept in health institutions in terms of implicit leadership.

In this study, detailed information about the concept of implicit leadership was given, factors effecting the formation of implicit leadership were taken into consideration, different dimensions of implicit leadership were taken into consideration and implicit leadership was taken into consideration in terms of health institutions.

Keywords

• Leader,Implicit Leadership,Health Institutions

References

1. Abdalla, I.A. ve Al-Homoud, A.M. (2001). Exploring the Implicit Leadership Theory in the Arabian Gulf states, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50 (4), 506-531.
2. Berber, A., Rofcanin, Y. (2012). Perceıvers As Cognıtıve Mısers: Scale Development For Implıcıt Leadershıp Theorıes In The Context Of MBA Degrees From Turkey, İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. 13(1), 15-44.
3. Brodbeck, F.C., (2000), Cultural Variation of Leadership Prototypes Across 22 European Countries, Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 73 (1), 1-29. Chiu, C., Hong, Y., Dweck, C.S., (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 19.
4. Den Hartog, D.N., House, R.J., Hanges, P.J., (1999). Culture Specific and Crossculturally Generalizable Implicit Leadership Theories: Are Attrıbutes of Charismatıc/Transformatıonal Leadership Universally Endorsed. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 219-256.
5. Epitropaki, O., Sy, T., Martin, R., Tram-Quon, S., Topakas, A., (2013). Implicit Leadership and Followership Theories “in the wild”: Taking stock of information-processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings, The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 858-881.
6. Eroğluer, K. (2014). Örtük Liderlik Üzerine Bir Analiz: İmalat Sektörü Çalışanlarının Kişilik Özelliklerinin Liderlik Algılarına Etkisi, Ege Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(2), 105-147.
7. Hemphill, J., Coons, A. (1957). Development of the Leader Behaviour Description Questionnaire, ed. R.M.Stogill- A.E. Coons, Leader Behaviour: Its Description and Measurement, Colombus: Ohio State University.
8. Hunt, J.G., Boal, K.B. ve Sorenson, R.L., (1990), Top Management Leadership: Inside the Black Box, Leadership Quarterly, 1, 41-65.

9. Junker, N.M., Dick, R., (2014). Implicit theories in organizational settings: A systematic review and research agenda of implicit leadership and followership theories, The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 1154-1173.
10. Karahan, A. (2008). Hastanelerde Liderlik ve Örgütsel Bağlılık Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi, 10(1), 145-162.
11. Keklik, B., (2012). Sağlık Hizmetlerinde Benimsenen Liderlik Tiplerinin Belirlenmesi: Özel Bir Hastane Örneği, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, İİBF Dergisi, 14(1), 73-93.
12. Keller, T., (1999). Images of the familiar: Individual Differences and Implicit Leadership Theories, Leadership Quarterly, 10(4), 589-607.
13. Kızıloğlu, A., (2011). Örtük Liderlik Kuramı Bağlamında, Sosyoekonomik Statü (Ses) Gruplarının Liderlik Algılaması, Kara Harp Okulu Savunma Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.
14. Koçel T. (2010). İşletme Yöneticiliği, Beta Yayın, İstanbul.
15. Lavalley, J.B., (2013). Leadership Schemas: The Influence of Organizational Context on Implicit Leadership Theories. Master of Science. Department of Psychological Sciences College of Arts and Sciences. Kansas State University.
16. Levy, S.R., Chui, C., Hong, Y., (2006), Lay Theories and Intergroup Relations, Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9(1), 5-24.
17. Ling, W., Chıa, R.S. ve Fang, L., (2000). Chinese Implicit Leadership Theory, The Journal of Social Psychology, 140 (6), 729-739.
18. Lord, R.G, Foti, R.J., de Vader, R. J., (1984). A Test of Leadership Categorization Theory: Internal Structure, Information Processing, and Leadership Perceptions, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 343-378.
19. Lord, R.G., Foti, R.J., ve Phıllıps, J.S., (1982). A Theory of Leadership Categorization, Hunt, J.G., Sekaran, U., ve Schriesheim, C.A., (Ed.), Leadership: Beyond Establishment Views, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Pres, 104-121.
20. Lord, R.G., Maher, K.J., (1991). Leadership and Information Processing: Linking Perceptions and Performance, Boston, Unwin Hyman.
21. Meindl, J.R., (1995). The Romance of Leadership as a Follower-Centric Theory: A Social Constructionist Approach, Leadership Quarterly, 6 (3), 329-341.
22. Nye, J.L. ve Forsyth, D.R., (1991). The Effects of Prototype-Based Biases on Leadership Appraisals: A Test of Leadership Categorization Theory, Small Group Research, 22 (3), 360-379.
23. Shondrick, S.J., Dinh, J.E., Lord, R.G., (2010). Developments in implicit leadership theory and cognitive science: Applications to improving measurement and understanding alternatives to hierarchical leadership, The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 959-978.
24. Smith, J.A. ve Foti, R.J., (1998), A Pattern Approach to the Study of Leader Emergence, Leadership Quarterly, 9 (2), 147-160.
25. Sternberg, R.J., (1985), Impilicit Theories of Intelligence Creativity, and Wisdom, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 607-627.
26. Tabak, A., Kızıloğlu A., Türköz T. (2013). Örtük Liderlik Ölçeği Geliştirme Çalışması, ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 40, 97-138.
27. Türetgen, İ.Ö., Cesur, S., (2010). İş Yaşamındaki Yönetici Liderliğe ve Siyasi Liderliğe Yönelik Örtük Liderlik Teorilerinin Karşılaştırılması, İ.Ü. Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi tarafından desteklenen çalışma. Proje No. BYP 3228. Yönetim Yıl:21 Sayı 67, 52-66.