BibTex RIS Cite

Evaluation of The Plusoptix S08 in Dedection of Refractive Amblyogenic Risk Factors

Year 2016, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 0 - 0, 29.06.2016

Abstract

Amaç: Plusoptix S08 cihazının, refraktif ambliyopiye yol açabilecek, risk faktörlerinin tespiti açısından değerlendirmek.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Prospektif karşılaştırmalı çalışmamıza 2 ve 12 yaşları arasındaki 97 çocuk hastamızı dahil ettik. Plusoptix S08 ve Topcon otorefraktometre cihazları
arasındaki farklar, sensitivite, spesivite, pozitif prediktif değer, negatif prediktif değer, yanlış negatif sonuç, yanlış pozitif sonuç açısından; student-t
korelasyon testi kullanılarak karşılaştırıldı. P<0.05 bulunduğunda fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı kabul edildi. Plusoptix S08 ve Topcon otorefraktometreden
elde edilen refraktif sonuçlar; bütün hastalar, 2-5 yaş aralığı ve 5-12 yaş aralığındaki hastalar açısından değerlendirildi.
Bulgular: Yapılan tam oftalmolojik muayene sonucunda 25 hastada (%26) ambliyopiye sebep olabilecek refraktif kusur tespit edildi. Plusoptix cihazının; ambliyopiye
yol açan refraktif risk faktörlerini tespit etmede sensitivitesi %64, spesivitesi %93, pozitif prediktif değeri %76, negatif prediktif değeri %88
olarak tespit edildi. Yanlış negatif sonuç %9, yanlış pozitif sonuç %5 olarak bulundu. Sferik (p=0,0001) ve silindirik (P=0,005) değerleri açısından
plusoptix S08 ve Topcon otorefraktometre arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark tespit edilirken; sferik ekivalan açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı
fark tespit edilmedi (p=1.6).
Sonuç: Plusoptix S08 kolay kullanılan, hızlı ve özellikle okul öncesi çocuklarda refraktif kusur tespitinde iyi spesivite ve sensitiviteye sahip bir cihazdır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Plusoptix S08, refraktif ambliyopi

References

  • C Williams, K Northstone, R A Harrad, J M Sparrow et al. Amblyopia
  • treatment outcomes after screening before or at age 3 years: follow up
  • from randomised trial BMJ 2002;324:1549
  • Williams C, Northstone K, Harrad RA, Sparrow JM ALSPAC Study Team.
  • Amblyopia treatment outcomes after preschool screening v school
  • entry screening: observational data from a prospective cohort study.Br J
  • Ophthalmol. 2003;87(8):988-93.
  • US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for visual impairment in
  • children younger than age 5 years: recommendation statement. Ann Fam
  • Med 2004;2:263-6
  • Leman R, Armitage MD, Arnold RW. The Receiver-Operator Curve for Flip-
  • Card Surround HOTV in Younger School Children: Validation of a Simple
  • Flip Card for School Acuity Testing. Am Orthopt J. 2005;5(5):128-35. doi:
  • 3368/aoj.55.1.128.
  • Salcido AA, Bradley J, Donahue SP. Predictive value of photoscreening and
  • traditional screening of preschool children. JAAPOS. 2005;9(2):114-20.
  • Arnold RW, Armitage MD, Gionet EG, Balinger A et al. The cost and yield of
  • photoscreening: impact of photoscreening on overall pediatric ophthalmic
  • costs. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2005;42(2):103-11.
  • Clausen MM, Arnold RW. Pediatric eye/vision screening. Referral criteria
  • for the pedia vision plus optix s 04 photoscreener compared to visual
  • acuity and digital photoscreening. Kindergarten computer photoscreening.
  • Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 2007;22(2):83-9.
  • Donahue SP, Arthur B, Neely DE, Arnold RW, Silbert D et al. POS Vision
  • Screening Committee. Guidelines for automated preschool vision
  • screening: a 10-year, evidence-based update. J AAPOS. 2013;17(1):4-8.
  • doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.09.012. Epub 2013 Jan 27.
  • Kvarnström G, Jakobsson P, Lennerstrand G. Visual screening of Swedish
  • children: an ophthalmological evaluation. Acta Ophthalmol Scand.
  • ;79(3):240-4.
  • Kvarnström G, Jakobsson P, Lennerstrand G, Dehlgaard J. Preventable
  • vision loss in children: A public health concern. Am Orthop J 2006;5(6):3-6
  • Mary Louise Z. Collins Screening Methods for Detection of Preclinical Visual
  • Loss in Children: Implementing Programs—The Political Will. Am Orthop J
  • ;5(6):50-3
  • Matta NS, Singman EL, Silbert DI. Performance of the Plusoptix vision
  • screener for the detection of amblyopia risk factors in children. J AAPOS.
  • ;12(5):490-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.04.004. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
  • Williams C, Northstone K, Harrad RA, Sparrow JM et al. ALSPAC Study
  • Team. Amblyopia treatment outcomes after preschool screening v school
  • entry screening: observational data from a prospective cohort study. Br J
  • Ophthalmol. 2003;87(8):988-93.
  • Eibschitz-Tsimhoni M, Friedman T, Naor J, Eibschitz N et al. Early screening
  • for amblyogenic risk factors lowers the prevalence and severity of
  • amblyopia. J AAPOS. 2000;4(4):194-9.
  • Schmidt P, Maguire M, Dobson V et al. Comparison of preschool vision
  • screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the
  • Vision In Preschoolers Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(4):637-50.
  • Bloomberg JD, Suh DW. The accuracy of the plusoptiX A08 photoscreener
  • in detecting risk factors for amblyopia in central Iowa. JAAPOS.
  • ;17(3):301-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.03.014.
  • Moghaddam AA, Kargozar A, Zarei-Ghanavati M, Najjaran M et al.
  • Screening for amblyopia risk factors in pre-verbal children using the
  • Plusoptix photoscreener: a cross-sectional population-based study. Br J
  • Ophthalmol. 2012;96(1):83-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2010.190405. Epub 2011
  • Apr 21.
  • Matta NS, Arnold RW, Singman EL, Silbert DI. Comparison between the
  • plusoptiX and MTI Photoscreeners. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(12):1591-
  • doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.294.
  • Simons BD, Siatkowski RM, Schiffman JC, Berry BE et al. Pediatric
  • photoscreening for strabismus and refractive errors in a high-risk
  • population. Ophthalmology. 1999 ;106(6):1073-80.
  • Arnold RW. Pseudo-false positive eye/vision photoscreening due to
  • accommodative insufficiency. A serendipitous benefit for poor readers?
  • Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 2004;19(2):75-80.
  • Matta NS, Singman EL, Silbert DI. Performance of the plusoptiX S04
  • photoscreener for the detection of amblyopia risk factors in children aged
  • to 5. J AAPOS. 2010;14(2):147-9.
  • Arnold RW, Armitage MD. Performance of four new photoscreeners
  • on pediatric patients with high risk amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol
  • Strabismus. 2014;51(1):46-52. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20131223-02.
  • Epub 2014 Jan 3.
  • McCurry TC, Lawrence LM, Wilson ME, Mayo L The plusoptiX S08
  • photoscreener as a vision screening tool for children with autism. J AAPOS.
  • ;17(4):374-7.
  • Dahlmann-Noor AH, Vrotsou K, Kostakis V, Brown J, Heath J et al. Vision
  • screening in children by Plusoptix Vision Screener compared with goldstandard
  • orthoptic assessment. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;93(3):342-5.
  • References
  • J hum rhythm - June 2016;2(2):94-98
Year 2016, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 0 - 0, 29.06.2016

Abstract

References

  • C Williams, K Northstone, R A Harrad, J M Sparrow et al. Amblyopia
  • treatment outcomes after screening before or at age 3 years: follow up
  • from randomised trial BMJ 2002;324:1549
  • Williams C, Northstone K, Harrad RA, Sparrow JM ALSPAC Study Team.
  • Amblyopia treatment outcomes after preschool screening v school
  • entry screening: observational data from a prospective cohort study.Br J
  • Ophthalmol. 2003;87(8):988-93.
  • US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for visual impairment in
  • children younger than age 5 years: recommendation statement. Ann Fam
  • Med 2004;2:263-6
  • Leman R, Armitage MD, Arnold RW. The Receiver-Operator Curve for Flip-
  • Card Surround HOTV in Younger School Children: Validation of a Simple
  • Flip Card for School Acuity Testing. Am Orthopt J. 2005;5(5):128-35. doi:
  • 3368/aoj.55.1.128.
  • Salcido AA, Bradley J, Donahue SP. Predictive value of photoscreening and
  • traditional screening of preschool children. JAAPOS. 2005;9(2):114-20.
  • Arnold RW, Armitage MD, Gionet EG, Balinger A et al. The cost and yield of
  • photoscreening: impact of photoscreening on overall pediatric ophthalmic
  • costs. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2005;42(2):103-11.
  • Clausen MM, Arnold RW. Pediatric eye/vision screening. Referral criteria
  • for the pedia vision plus optix s 04 photoscreener compared to visual
  • acuity and digital photoscreening. Kindergarten computer photoscreening.
  • Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 2007;22(2):83-9.
  • Donahue SP, Arthur B, Neely DE, Arnold RW, Silbert D et al. POS Vision
  • Screening Committee. Guidelines for automated preschool vision
  • screening: a 10-year, evidence-based update. J AAPOS. 2013;17(1):4-8.
  • doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.09.012. Epub 2013 Jan 27.
  • Kvarnström G, Jakobsson P, Lennerstrand G. Visual screening of Swedish
  • children: an ophthalmological evaluation. Acta Ophthalmol Scand.
  • ;79(3):240-4.
  • Kvarnström G, Jakobsson P, Lennerstrand G, Dehlgaard J. Preventable
  • vision loss in children: A public health concern. Am Orthop J 2006;5(6):3-6
  • Mary Louise Z. Collins Screening Methods for Detection of Preclinical Visual
  • Loss in Children: Implementing Programs—The Political Will. Am Orthop J
  • ;5(6):50-3
  • Matta NS, Singman EL, Silbert DI. Performance of the Plusoptix vision
  • screener for the detection of amblyopia risk factors in children. J AAPOS.
  • ;12(5):490-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.04.004. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
  • Williams C, Northstone K, Harrad RA, Sparrow JM et al. ALSPAC Study
  • Team. Amblyopia treatment outcomes after preschool screening v school
  • entry screening: observational data from a prospective cohort study. Br J
  • Ophthalmol. 2003;87(8):988-93.
  • Eibschitz-Tsimhoni M, Friedman T, Naor J, Eibschitz N et al. Early screening
  • for amblyogenic risk factors lowers the prevalence and severity of
  • amblyopia. J AAPOS. 2000;4(4):194-9.
  • Schmidt P, Maguire M, Dobson V et al. Comparison of preschool vision
  • screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the
  • Vision In Preschoolers Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(4):637-50.
  • Bloomberg JD, Suh DW. The accuracy of the plusoptiX A08 photoscreener
  • in detecting risk factors for amblyopia in central Iowa. JAAPOS.
  • ;17(3):301-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.03.014.
  • Moghaddam AA, Kargozar A, Zarei-Ghanavati M, Najjaran M et al.
  • Screening for amblyopia risk factors in pre-verbal children using the
  • Plusoptix photoscreener: a cross-sectional population-based study. Br J
  • Ophthalmol. 2012;96(1):83-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2010.190405. Epub 2011
  • Apr 21.
  • Matta NS, Arnold RW, Singman EL, Silbert DI. Comparison between the
  • plusoptiX and MTI Photoscreeners. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(12):1591-
  • doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.294.
  • Simons BD, Siatkowski RM, Schiffman JC, Berry BE et al. Pediatric
  • photoscreening for strabismus and refractive errors in a high-risk
  • population. Ophthalmology. 1999 ;106(6):1073-80.
  • Arnold RW. Pseudo-false positive eye/vision photoscreening due to
  • accommodative insufficiency. A serendipitous benefit for poor readers?
  • Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 2004;19(2):75-80.
  • Matta NS, Singman EL, Silbert DI. Performance of the plusoptiX S04
  • photoscreener for the detection of amblyopia risk factors in children aged
  • to 5. J AAPOS. 2010;14(2):147-9.
  • Arnold RW, Armitage MD. Performance of four new photoscreeners
  • on pediatric patients with high risk amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol
  • Strabismus. 2014;51(1):46-52. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20131223-02.
  • Epub 2014 Jan 3.
  • McCurry TC, Lawrence LM, Wilson ME, Mayo L The plusoptiX S08
  • photoscreener as a vision screening tool for children with autism. J AAPOS.
  • ;17(4):374-7.
  • Dahlmann-Noor AH, Vrotsou K, Kostakis V, Brown J, Heath J et al. Vision
  • screening in children by Plusoptix Vision Screener compared with goldstandard
  • orthoptic assessment. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;93(3):342-5.
  • References
  • J hum rhythm - June 2016;2(2):94-98
There are 80 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Faruk Kaya This is me

İbrahim Koçak This is me

Ali Aydın This is me

Hakan Baybora This is me

Hacı Koç This is me

Salih Bozkurt This is me

Publication Date June 29, 2016
Submission Date June 29, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 2 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Kaya, F., Koçak, İ., Aydın, A., Baybora, H., et al. (2016). Evaluation of The Plusoptix S08 in Dedection of Refractive Amblyogenic Risk Factors. Journal of Human Rhythm, 2(2).
AMA Kaya F, Koçak İ, Aydın A, Baybora H, Koç H, Bozkurt S. Evaluation of The Plusoptix S08 in Dedection of Refractive Amblyogenic Risk Factors. Journal of Human Rhythm. June 2016;2(2).
Chicago Kaya, Faruk, İbrahim Koçak, Ali Aydın, Hakan Baybora, Hacı Koç, and Salih Bozkurt. “Evaluation of The Plusoptix S08 in Dedection of Refractive Amblyogenic Risk Factors”. Journal of Human Rhythm 2, no. 2 (June 2016).
EndNote Kaya F, Koçak İ, Aydın A, Baybora H, Koç H, Bozkurt S (June 1, 2016) Evaluation of The Plusoptix S08 in Dedection of Refractive Amblyogenic Risk Factors. Journal of Human Rhythm 2 2
IEEE F. Kaya, İ. Koçak, A. Aydın, H. Baybora, H. Koç, and S. Bozkurt, “Evaluation of The Plusoptix S08 in Dedection of Refractive Amblyogenic Risk Factors”, Journal of Human Rhythm, vol. 2, no. 2, 2016.
ISNAD Kaya, Faruk et al. “Evaluation of The Plusoptix S08 in Dedection of Refractive Amblyogenic Risk Factors”. Journal of Human Rhythm 2/2 (June 2016).
JAMA Kaya F, Koçak İ, Aydın A, Baybora H, Koç H, Bozkurt S. Evaluation of The Plusoptix S08 in Dedection of Refractive Amblyogenic Risk Factors. Journal of Human Rhythm. 2016;2.
MLA Kaya, Faruk et al. “Evaluation of The Plusoptix S08 in Dedection of Refractive Amblyogenic Risk Factors”. Journal of Human Rhythm, vol. 2, no. 2, 2016.
Vancouver Kaya F, Koçak İ, Aydın A, Baybora H, Koç H, Bozkurt S. Evaluation of The Plusoptix S08 in Dedection of Refractive Amblyogenic Risk Factors. Journal of Human Rhythm. 2016;2(2).