Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2024, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 39 - 47, 21.11.2024

Abstract

References

  • Bayraç, H. N. (2018). Uluslararası doğalgaz piyasasının ekonomik yapısı ve uygulanan politikalar. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 13(3), 13-36.
  • IEA, Energy for All, IEA, Paris, (2011). https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-for-all
  • Cameron, P. D., & Brothwood, M. (2002). Competition in energy markets: law and regulation in the European Union. Oxford University Press, USA.
  • Beyca, O. F., Ervural, B. C., Tatoglu, E., Ozuyar, P. G., & Zaim, S. (2019). Using machine learning tools for forecasting natural gas consumption in the province of Istanbul. Energy Economics, 80, 937-949.
  • Aydin, G. (2015). Forecasting natural gas production using various regression models. Petroleum Science and Technology, 33(15-16), 1486-1492.
  • Al-Fattah, S. M., & Startzman, R. A., (2001). In SPE hydrocarbon economics and evaluation symposium, OnePetro.
  • Nguyen-Le, V., Kim, M., Shin, H., & Little, E. (2021). Multivariate approach to the gas production forecast using early production data for Barnett shale reservoir. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 87, 103776.
  • Zheng, C., Wu, W. Z., Xie, W., & Li, Q. (2021). A MFO-based conformable fractional nonhomogeneous grey Bernoulli model for natural gas production and consumption forecasting. Applied Soft Computing, 99, 106891.
  • Sen, D., Günay, M. E., & Tunç, K. M. (2019). Forecasting annual natural gas consumption using socio-economic indicators for making future policies. Energy, 173, 1106-1118.
  • Zhang, W., & Yang, J. (2015). Forecasting natural gas consumption in China by Bayesian model averaging. Energy Reports, 1, 216-220.
  • Xue, L., Liu, Y., Xiong, Y., Liu, Y., Cui, X., & Lei, G. (2021). A data-driven shale gas production forecasting method based on the multi-objective random forest regression. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 196, 107801.
  • Manigandan, P., Alam, M. S., Alharthi, M., Khan, U., Alagirisamy, K., Pachiyappan, D., & Rehman, A. (2021). Forecasting natural gas production and consumption in United States-evidence from SARIMA and SARIMAX models. Energies, 14(19), 6021.
  • Li, N., Wang, J., Wu, L., & Bentley, Y. (2021). Predicting monthly natural gas production in China using a novel grey seasonal model with particle swarm optimization. Energy, 215, 119118.
  • Liu, C., Lao, T., Wu, W. Z., Xie, W., & Zhu, H. (2022). An optimized nonlinear grey Bernoulli prediction model and its application in natural gas production. Expert Systems with Applications, 194, 116448.
  • Ma, D., Wu, R., Li, Z., Cen, K., Gao, J., & Zhang, Z. (2022). A new method to forecast multi-time scale load of natural gas based on augmentation data-machine learning model. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 48, 166-175.
  • Bassey, M., Akpabio, M. G., & Agwu, O. E. (2024). Enhancing Natural Gas Production Prediction Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Study with Random Forest and Artificial Neural Network Models. In SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition (p. D021S010R004). SPE.
  • Mao, S., Chen, B., Malki, M., Chen, F., Morales, M., Ma, Z., & Mehana, M. (2024). Efficient prediction of hydrogen storage performance in depleted gas reservoirs using machine learning. Applied Energy, 361, 122914.
  • Singh, S., Bansal, P., Hosen, M., & Bansal, S. K. (2023). Forecasting annual natural gas consumption in USA: Application of machine learning techniques-ANN and SVM. Resources Policy, 80, 103159.
  • Ямкин, М. А., Сафиуллина, Е. У., & Ямкин, А. В. (2024). Machine learning methods for selecting candidate wells for bottomhole formation zone treatment. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University Geo Assets Engineering, 335(5), 7-16.
  • Anani, A., Adewuyi, S. O., Risso, N., & Nyaaba, W. (2024). Advancements in machine learning techniques for coal and gas outburst prediction in underground mines. International Journal of Coal Geology, 104471.
  • Schlüter, S., Pappert, S., & Neumann, M. (2024). Interval Forecasts for Gas Prices in the Face of Structural Breaks--Statistical Models vs. Neural Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16723.
  • Box, G. E., Jenkins, G. M., Reinsel, G. C., & Ljung, G. M. (2015). Time series analysis: forecasting and control. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Huang, G. B., Zhu, Q. Y., & Siew, C. K. (2006). Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing, 70(1-3), 489-501.
  • Ertuğrul, Ö. F., & Kaya, Y. (2014). A detailed analysis on extreme learning machine and novel approaches based on ELM. American Journal of computer science and engineering, 1(5), 43-50.
  • Akın, P. (2021). Comparing extreme learning machine and multilayer perception: tourism data as an example. Research & Reviews in Science and Mathematics, 65.
  • Torres, R. A., & Hu, Y. H. (2013). Prediction of NBA games based on Machine Learning Methods. University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Forecasting of Natural Gas Supplied for EU in Gazprom with ARIMA and Machine Learning Methods

Year 2024, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 39 - 47, 21.11.2024

Abstract

Natural gas, as an environmentally friendly energy source, is gaining importance with its capacity to respond to the increasing energy demand worldwide. Its wide range of uses and low carbon emissions place it at the heart of sustainable energy policies. This critical resource in the energy sector has a dynamic and complex structure under the influence of political, economic, socio-cultural and technological factors. In particular, the forecasting of natural gas supply is of great importance for energy planning and strategic decision making. This study examines different modelling techniques for forecasting Gazprom's natural gas supply. ARIMA, ELM and MLP models are used, and their performance is compared. ARIMA is a classical method often preferred in time series analysis and makes predictions based on past values of the data. ELM is a model based on artificial neural networks and has a fast-learning capability. MLP is a deep learning method with the ability to model complex relationships thanks to its layered structure. As a result of the comparisons, the MLP model was found to perform best. MLP has the lowest error criterion and is more successful than other models in forecasting natural gas supply. This can be attributed to the complexity of the MLP and its strong learning ability.

References

  • Bayraç, H. N. (2018). Uluslararası doğalgaz piyasasının ekonomik yapısı ve uygulanan politikalar. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 13(3), 13-36.
  • IEA, Energy for All, IEA, Paris, (2011). https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-for-all
  • Cameron, P. D., & Brothwood, M. (2002). Competition in energy markets: law and regulation in the European Union. Oxford University Press, USA.
  • Beyca, O. F., Ervural, B. C., Tatoglu, E., Ozuyar, P. G., & Zaim, S. (2019). Using machine learning tools for forecasting natural gas consumption in the province of Istanbul. Energy Economics, 80, 937-949.
  • Aydin, G. (2015). Forecasting natural gas production using various regression models. Petroleum Science and Technology, 33(15-16), 1486-1492.
  • Al-Fattah, S. M., & Startzman, R. A., (2001). In SPE hydrocarbon economics and evaluation symposium, OnePetro.
  • Nguyen-Le, V., Kim, M., Shin, H., & Little, E. (2021). Multivariate approach to the gas production forecast using early production data for Barnett shale reservoir. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 87, 103776.
  • Zheng, C., Wu, W. Z., Xie, W., & Li, Q. (2021). A MFO-based conformable fractional nonhomogeneous grey Bernoulli model for natural gas production and consumption forecasting. Applied Soft Computing, 99, 106891.
  • Sen, D., Günay, M. E., & Tunç, K. M. (2019). Forecasting annual natural gas consumption using socio-economic indicators for making future policies. Energy, 173, 1106-1118.
  • Zhang, W., & Yang, J. (2015). Forecasting natural gas consumption in China by Bayesian model averaging. Energy Reports, 1, 216-220.
  • Xue, L., Liu, Y., Xiong, Y., Liu, Y., Cui, X., & Lei, G. (2021). A data-driven shale gas production forecasting method based on the multi-objective random forest regression. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 196, 107801.
  • Manigandan, P., Alam, M. S., Alharthi, M., Khan, U., Alagirisamy, K., Pachiyappan, D., & Rehman, A. (2021). Forecasting natural gas production and consumption in United States-evidence from SARIMA and SARIMAX models. Energies, 14(19), 6021.
  • Li, N., Wang, J., Wu, L., & Bentley, Y. (2021). Predicting monthly natural gas production in China using a novel grey seasonal model with particle swarm optimization. Energy, 215, 119118.
  • Liu, C., Lao, T., Wu, W. Z., Xie, W., & Zhu, H. (2022). An optimized nonlinear grey Bernoulli prediction model and its application in natural gas production. Expert Systems with Applications, 194, 116448.
  • Ma, D., Wu, R., Li, Z., Cen, K., Gao, J., & Zhang, Z. (2022). A new method to forecast multi-time scale load of natural gas based on augmentation data-machine learning model. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 48, 166-175.
  • Bassey, M., Akpabio, M. G., & Agwu, O. E. (2024). Enhancing Natural Gas Production Prediction Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Study with Random Forest and Artificial Neural Network Models. In SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition (p. D021S010R004). SPE.
  • Mao, S., Chen, B., Malki, M., Chen, F., Morales, M., Ma, Z., & Mehana, M. (2024). Efficient prediction of hydrogen storage performance in depleted gas reservoirs using machine learning. Applied Energy, 361, 122914.
  • Singh, S., Bansal, P., Hosen, M., & Bansal, S. K. (2023). Forecasting annual natural gas consumption in USA: Application of machine learning techniques-ANN and SVM. Resources Policy, 80, 103159.
  • Ямкин, М. А., Сафиуллина, Е. У., & Ямкин, А. В. (2024). Machine learning methods for selecting candidate wells for bottomhole formation zone treatment. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University Geo Assets Engineering, 335(5), 7-16.
  • Anani, A., Adewuyi, S. O., Risso, N., & Nyaaba, W. (2024). Advancements in machine learning techniques for coal and gas outburst prediction in underground mines. International Journal of Coal Geology, 104471.
  • Schlüter, S., Pappert, S., & Neumann, M. (2024). Interval Forecasts for Gas Prices in the Face of Structural Breaks--Statistical Models vs. Neural Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16723.
  • Box, G. E., Jenkins, G. M., Reinsel, G. C., & Ljung, G. M. (2015). Time series analysis: forecasting and control. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Huang, G. B., Zhu, Q. Y., & Siew, C. K. (2006). Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing, 70(1-3), 489-501.
  • Ertuğrul, Ö. F., & Kaya, Y. (2014). A detailed analysis on extreme learning machine and novel approaches based on ELM. American Journal of computer science and engineering, 1(5), 43-50.
  • Akın, P. (2021). Comparing extreme learning machine and multilayer perception: tourism data as an example. Research & Reviews in Science and Mathematics, 65.
  • Torres, R. A., & Hu, Y. H. (2013). Prediction of NBA games based on Machine Learning Methods. University of Wisconsin, Madison.
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Machine Learning Algorithms, Machine Learning (Other)
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Tuba Koc 0000-0001-5204-0846

Emre Dunder 0000-0003-0230-8968

Haydar Koç 0000-0002-8568-4717

Publication Date November 21, 2024
Submission Date August 19, 2024
Acceptance Date November 19, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 7 Issue: 1

Cite

IEEE T. Koc, E. Dunder, and H. Koç, “Forecasting of Natural Gas Supplied for EU in Gazprom with ARIMA and Machine Learning Methods”, International Journal of Data Science and Applications, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 2024.

AI Research and Application Center, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Sakarya, Türkiye.