E-Learning in Health: Investigation of Technology Acceptance and Usage of Family Physicians According to Demographic Factors

Abstract

E-learning is the changing and renewing face of education in health as in many fields. Developments in technology prepare a suitable environment for the realization of various structural changes in the continuing education of health professionals. Since e-learning provides asynchronous learning opportunities to health professionals working in different geographical regions, it provides various opportunities for the career development of health professionals. One of Turkey's most significant e-learning projects in the health field was carried out by the Family Medicine Distance Education Centre (AHUZEM). The e-learning project prepared for family physicians aimed to provide much more accessible, effective, and faster training for family physicians. This study aims to reveal family physicians' adoption of e-learning applications according to demographic factors. In the study, the Unified Technology Acceptance and Use Model (UTAUT) developed by Venkatesh et al. (2003) by examining many theories and models was used as a data collection tool. In addition, the author integrated the attitude towards technology use dimension consisting of 4 questions into the model by examining the relevant literature. In addition, the research was organized according to a 5-point Likert-type scale. The data was obtained from 429 family physicians who agreed to participate in the online survey shared on social networks nationwide by convenience sampling. The results obtained by entering the data into AMOS 18.0 program were analyzed in t-test and ANOVA tests. According to the results of the analyses, a significant difference was found in the intention to use e-learning and UTAUT according to age, specialty, working time, and e-learning experience. However, no significant difference was found according to gender.

Keywords

• E-learnig
• Family Physcians
• Technology use

References

1. [1] Boelen, C. “A New Paradigm for Medical Schools A Century After Flexner’s Report. “Bulletin Of the World Health Organization; vol. 80, pp. 592-594., 2002.
2. [2] Irby, D. M., Cooke, M., & O'brien, B. C.” Calls for Reform of Medical Education by The Carnegie Foundation For The Advancement Of Teaching: 1910 And 2010”. Academic Medicine, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 220-227, 2010.
3. [3] Ruiz, J. G., Mintzer, M. J., & Leipzig, R. M.” Virtual Patients: A Critical Literature Review and Proposed Next Steps”. Medical Education, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 303-311, 2009.
4. [4] Cook, D. A., & Triola, M. M. “Virtual Patients: A Critical Literature Review and Proposed Next Steps.” Medical Education, vol. 4, no. 43, pp. 303-311, 2009
5. [5] Ellaway, R. And Masters, K. “Amee Guide 32: E-Learning in Medical Education Part 1: Learning, Teaching and Assessment”. Medical Teacher, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 455-473, 2008
6. [6] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View”, Management Information Systems Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, 2003.
7. [7] Venkatesh, V. And Davis, F. D.” A Theoretical Extension of The Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies”. Management Science, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 186-204, 2000.
8. [8] Venkatesh, V. And Bala, H. “Technology Acceptance Model 3 And A Research Agenda on Interventions.” Decision Sciences, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 273-315, 2008.

9. [9] Masood, K., Jabeen, S., Tariq, S., Rubbani, F. M. “The Impact of Adoption and Utilization Of E-Learning Technology By Employees On The E-Learning System On Organizational Learning: Mediating Role Of Service Quality Of The E-Learning System”. Journal Of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, vol. 27, no. 2, 2021.
10. [10] Chen, J., L, R., Gan, M., Fu, Z., Yuan, F. “Public Acceptance of Driverless Buses in China: An Empirical Analysis Based on An Extended Utaut Model.” Discrete Dynamics In Nature And Society, vol special issue pp. 1-13, 2020.
11. [11] Moore, G. C., Benbasat, I. “Development of An Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting and Information Technology Innovation”. Information Systems Research, vol.3, no. 2, pp. 192-222, 1991.
12. [12] Davis, F. D.“Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, And User Acceptance Of Information Technology”. Managemenet Information Systemtems Quarterly, vol. 3, no. 13, pp. 319-340, 1989.
13. [13] Davis, F.D., Bagozzi R.Z, Warshaw P. R. (1992) “Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in The Workplace”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1111-1132,1992.
14. [14] Taylor, S., Todd, P. “Decomposition and Crossover Effects in The Theory Planned Behaviour: A Study of Consumer Adoption Intentions”. International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 137-155, 1995.
15. [15] Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. “Personal Computing: Toward A Conceptual Model of Utilization”, Management Informon Systems Quarterly, vol. 1, pp. 125- 143, 1991.
16. [16] Compeau, D., & Higgins, C. “Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills”. Information Systems Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 118-143, 1995.
17. [17] Ajzen, I. “The Theory of Planned Behavior”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179-211, 1991.
18. [18] Hung, S. Y., Chang, C. M., & Yu, T. J. “Determinants of User Acceptance of The Egovernment Services: The Case of Online Tax Filing and Payment System”, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 97–122, 2006.
19. [19] Schaupp, L. C., Carter, L., & Mcbride, M. E. “E-File Adoption: A Study of U.S. Taxpayers’ Intentions”, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 26, pp. 636–644, 2010.
20. [20] İslamoğlu H.A., Alnıaçık, Ü., “Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri”, Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım, İstanbul, 2014.
21. [21] Tezcan, C. “Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleri “(Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, 2008.
22. [22] Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. ve Müller, H. “Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures.” Methods of Psychological Research Online, vol. 2, no. 8, 23-74, 2003.
23. [23] Afrizal, D. And Wallang, M. (2021). “Attitude On Intention to Use E-Government in Indonesia”. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 435-441, 2021.
24. [24] Venkatesh, V. And Bala, H. (2008). “Technology Acceptance Model 3 And A Research Agenda on Interventions”. Decision Sciences, vol. 2, no. 39, pp. 273-315. 2008.
25. [25] Vanderschaaf, H., Daim, T., Basoglu, N. “Factors Influencing Student Information Technology Adoption” Ieee Transactions on Engineering Management”, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 631-643, 2023.
26. [26] Subhani, W., Rehman, M., Baig, W. “Technology Acceptance in Public Sector Universities: A Case Study of University of The Punjab”. Journal Of Social Sciences Review, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 144-154, 2023.
27. [27] Ahmady, S., Mirmoghtadaie, Z., Zarifsanaiey, N., Thor, J. “Designing E-Learning in Medical Education: Toward A Comprehensive Model.” Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 254-271, 2021.
28. [28] Shabila, N., Alkhateeb, N., Dauod, A., Al-Dabbagh, A. “Exploring the Perspectives of Medical Students on Application Of E-Learning in Medical Education During the Covid-19 Pandemic”. Work, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 751-762, 2021.
29. [29] Alsaywid, B., Lytras, M. D., Abuzenada, M., Lytra, H., Sultan, L., Badawoud, H., ... & Apostolaki, A.” Effectiveness and Preparedness of Institutions' E-Learning Methods During the Covid-19 Pandemic for Residents Medical Training In Saudi Arabia: A Pilot Study”. Frontiers In Public Health, vol. 9, 2021.
30. [30] Noerholk, L. And Tolsgaard, M.“Structural Individualism or Collaborative Mindsets: Next Steps for Peer Learning.” Medical Education, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 352-354, 2002.