Akıllı Turizm, Sürdürülebilirlik ve Rekabetçi Konumlandırma: Kosova’nın Resmi Turizm Web Sitelerinden Bulgular

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Kosova’daki resmi turizm web sitelerinin yeni nesil teknolojilerin kullanımını nasıl aktardığını ve bu dijital yaklaşımların sürdürülebilirlik ilkeleriyle ne ölçüde uyumlu olduğunu inceleyerek destinasyon rekabetçiliğine katkılarını değerlendirmektedir. Çalışmada “yeni nesil teknolojiler” çevrim içi rezervasyon araçları, gerçek zamanlı bilgi sistemleri ve etkileşimli dijital özellikler gibi unsurlar olarak tanımlanmıştır. Dokuz resmi portal üzerinde gerçekleştirilen yönlendirilmiş nitel içerik analizi; teknoloji entegrasyonu, sürdürülebilirlik işaretleri ve rekabetçilik göstergeleri olmak üzere üç analitik boyut üzerinden yapılandırılmıştır. Belediye, doğa temelli ve miras odaklı destinasyonlara ait metinler, akıllı turizm literatürü ve sürdürülebilirlik gösterge sistemlerinden türetilen kuramsal bir çerçeve doğrultusunda kodlanmıştır. Bulgular, destinasyonlar arasında belirgin farklılıklar bulunduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Doğa temelli ve belediye portalları dijital olgunluk açısından öne çıkmakta; çevrimiçi işlemler, canlı operasyon bilgileri ve etkileşimli harita araçları gibi özellikleri daha yoğun biçimde sunmaktadır. Buna karşılık, miras odaklı siteler kültürel korunmaya vurgu yapan güçlü anlatılar oluşturmakla birlikte sınırlı etkileşimli dijital hizmet sunmaları nedeniyle teknoloji entegrasyonunda geride kalmaktadır. Sürdürülebilirlik iletişimi dengesizdir: Kültürel mirasın korunması sürekli ve belirgin biçimde vurgulanırken çevresel şeffaflık ve topluluk temelli sürdürülebilirlik çoğu sitede sınırlı düzeyde kalmaktadır. Rekabetçilik göstergeleri arasında marka vurgusu, pratik ziyaretçi bilgileri ve güzergâh geliştirme unsurları özellikle belediye portallarında daha güçlü bir biçimde ortaya çıkmaktadır. Genel olarak çalışma, operasyonel dijitalleşme ile çevresel ve sosyokültürel sürdürülebilirlik iletişimi arasında belirgin bir boşluk bulunduğunu; Kosova’daki destinasyonların teknolojiyi rekabetçi konumlandırma adına kullanmalarına rağmen sürdürülebilirlik açısından yeterince bütüncül bir dijital yaklaşım sunmadıklarını göstermektedir. Bulgular, çevresel performans göstergelerinin standartlaştırılması, miras alanlarında daha güçlü dijital yorumlama stratejileri ve destinasyonlar arası bütünleşik güzergâhların geliştirilmesi gerekliliğine işaret etmektedir.

Keywords

• Akıllı Turizm
• Destinasyon Rekabetçiliği
• İçerik Analizi
• Kosova
• Sürdürülebilirlik

Smart Tourism, Sustainability, and Competitive Positioning: Evidence from Kosovo’s Official Tourism Websites

Abstract

This study examines how official tourism websites in Kosovo represent the use of next generation technologies—defined here as digital tools such as online booking interfaces, real time information systems, and interactive features—and how these representations align with sustainability principles to strengthen destination competitiveness. Based on a directed qualitative content analysis of nine official portals, the research operationalizes three analytical dimensions: technology integration, sustainability signaling, and competitiveness cues. Textual content from municipal, nature based, and heritage custodial websites was systematically coded using a theory driven framework grounded in smart tourism concepts and sustainability indicator systems. The findings reveal substantial variation across destinations. Nature based sites and municipal portals demonstrate the highest levels of digital maturity, frequently incorporating online transactions, live operational updates, and interactive map based tools that enhance visitor experience and accessibility. In contrast, heritage custodial websites emphasize cultural preservation and authenticity, yet offer limited interactive digital services, indicating an imbalance between conservation-oriented narratives and technological adoption. Sustainability communication is uneven: heritage conservation is consistently and prominently articulated, while environmental transparency and community based sustainability appear limited across most websites. Competitiveness cues—including branding, practical travel information, and itinerary development—are generally stronger in municipal portals, which tend to integrate technological features with cultural and natural assets more effectively. Overall, the study highlights a persistent gap between operational digitization and the communication of environmental and sociocultural sustainability, suggesting that Kosovo’s destinations partially leverage technology as a driver of competitive positioning but underutilize it as a tool for transparent sustainability engagement. The results point to the need for standardized environmental performance indicators, clearer digital interpretation strategies for heritage sites, and more integrated cross destination itineraries to strengthen smart, sustainable tourism development across Kosovo.

Keywords

• Content Analysis
• Destination Competitiveness
• Kosovo
• Smart Tourism
• Sustainability

References

1. Artal Tur, A., & Badillo Amador, L. (2024). Systems of tourism sustainability indicators: A comparative analysis of international, European, and Spanish proposals. Smart Tourism, 5(2), 2800. https://doi.org/10.54517/st2800
2. Badari, A., Mursitama, T., Maulana, A., & Pradipto, Y. (2024). The role of digital marketing in sustainable tourism: Evidence from Indonesia. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 13(3), 637-644. https://doi.org/10.46222/ajhtl.19770720.548
3. Bramwell, B., & Lane, B. (1993). Sustainable tourism: An evolving global approach. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 1(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669589309450696
4. Buhalis, D., & Amaranggana, A. (2014). Smart tourism destinations. In Z. Xiang, & I. Tussyadiah (Eds.), Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2014 (pp. 553-564). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03973-2_40
5. Buhalis, D., & Amaranggana, A. (2015). Smart tourism destinations: Enhancing tourism experience through personalisation of services. In I. Tussyadiah, & A. Inversini (Eds.), Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015 (pp. 377-389). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14343-9_28
6. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
7. Elgammal, I. (2024). Content analysis. In J. Jafari, & H. Xiao (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Tourism (pp. 207-208). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74923-1_352
8. Gelvanovska-Garcia, N. (2023, June 15). Kosovo’s digital revolution: A success story (KODE project). Retrieved from Word Bank: https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/digital-development/kosovos-digital-revolution-success-story

9. Gretzel, U., Sigala, M., Xiang, Z., & Koo, C. (2015). Smart tourism: Foundations and developments. Electronic Markets, 25(3), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0196-8
10. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
11. Hunter, C. (1997). Sustainable tourism as an adaptive paradigm. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(4), 850-867. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(97)00036-4
12. Igoumenakis, G., & Giannoukou, I. (2025). Enhancing tourism business competitiveness through digital marketing tools: A case study on effective strategies and technologies. In V. Katsoni, & C. Costa (Eds.), Innovation and Creativity in Tourism, Business and Social Sciences-IACuDiT 2024. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. (pp. 351-373). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78471-2_14
13. Imran, M. (2024). Digital tourism communication to strengthen the attractiveness of destinations: Review. Journal of Applied Sciences and Humanities, 8(3), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.52403/gijash.20240307
14. Ismail, N. F., Suid, S. Z., Rashid, M. Z., & Boon, Q. W. (2022). Digital tourism: A content analysis of Southeast Asia tourism websites. TEAM Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 19(1), 43-54. Retrieved from https://teamjournalht.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/digital-tourism-a-content-analysis-of-southeast-asia-tourism-websites.pdf
15. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.
16. Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Sage.
17. Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
18. Landis, J., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
19. Leung, D., Law, R., van Hoof, H., & Buhalis, D. (2013). Social media in tourism and hospitality: A literature review. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 30(1–2), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2013.750919
20. Michopoulou, E., & Pappas, N. (2025). Editorial: Technology‐enabled competitiveness and experiences in tourism: A transformative era. International Journal of Tourism Research, 27(3), e70025. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.70025
21. Myrovali, G., Tzanis, G., & Morfoulaki, M. (2025). Sustainable tourism through digitalization and smart solutions. Sustainability, 17(12), 5383. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125383
22. OECD. (2025). Economic Convergence Scoreboard for the Western Balkans 2025—Digital transformation cluster. OECD. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/economic-convergence-scoreboard-for-the-western-balkans-2025_bc0babf3-en/full-report/digital-transformation-cluster_7cafb35e.html
23. Poshyanandana, S. (2019). Serial cultural heritage: Concept, applications, categorization and its roles in present day contexts. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 16(1), 69-84. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5f6f/32526428db1dd7424c6dcbdd9a587e75bb30.pdf
24. Republic of Kosovo - Ministry of Industry, Entrepreneurship and Trade. (2024). Kosovo Tourism Strategy 2024–2030. Government of Kosovo. Retrieved from https://kryeministri.rks-gov.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Tourism-Strategy-2024-2030.pdf
25. Ritchie, J. R., & Crouch, G. I. (2003). The competitive destination: A sustainable tourism perspective. CABI.
26. Rodrigues, V., Eusébio, C., & Breda, Z. (2023). Enhancing sustainable development through tourism digitalisation: A systematic literature review. Information Technology & Tourism, 25, 13-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-022-00241-w
27. Sağlam Gürkan, M., & Ulema, Ş. (2025). Yiyecek-içecek işletmelerinin web sitelerinin içerik analizi ile incelenmesi: Fethiye örneği. NEUGastro, 4(2), 94-109. https://doi.org/10.54497/neugastro.2025.17
28. Sonuç, N., & Süer, S. (2024). Smart tourism destinations and digitalization of cultural heritage for sustainability. In M. E. Abdelli, A. Sghaier, A. Akbaba, S. C. Gamoura, & H. D. Mohammadian (Eds.), Smart Cities for Sustainability: Approaches and Solutions (Vol. 32, pp. 151-168). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1877-636120230000033010
29. Stepchenkova, S., Kirilenko, A. P., & Morrison, A. M. (2008). Facilitating content analysis in tourism research. Journal of Travel Research, 47(4), 454-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287508326509
30. The Region. (2024, Temmuz 30). Medieval Monuments in Kosovo remain on UNESCO’s Endangered List. Retrieved from Connecting The Region: https://connectingregion.com/news/medieval-monuments-in-kosovo-remain-on-unescos-endangered-list/
31. Türkcan, B. (2024). Sustainable urban tourism from the perspectives of overtourism and smart tourism: A systematic literature review. Journal of Travel and Tourism Research, 25, 112-156. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/4065369
32. UN DESA. (n.d.). Sustainable tourism. Retrieved from UN Tourism - Department of Economic and Social Affairs: https://sdgs.un.org/topics/sustainable-tourism
33. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. (n.d.). Medieval Monuments in Kosovo (List No. 724). https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/724
34. UN Tourism. (2025). Sustainable development. Retrieved from UN Tourism: https://www.untourism.int/sustainable-development
35. UNCTAD & UN Tourism. (2025). Guiding principles for sustainable investment in tourism. UN Tourism. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/diae2024d6_en.pdf
36. UNEP. (2005). Making tourism more sustainable—A guide for policy makers. Retrieved from UN Environment Programme: https://www.unep.org/resources/report/making-tourism-more-sustainable-guide-policy-makers
37. UNESCO. (2025). State of Conservation (SOC) – Medieval Monuments in Kosovo. Retrieved from UNESCO - World Heritage Convention: https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/4769
38. UNWTO. (n.d.). International Network of Sustainable Tourism Observatories (INSTO). Retrieved from UN Tourism Regional Support Office for Asia and the Pacific: https://en.unwto-ap.org/observatories-insto/
39. Varolgüneş, F. K., Maldonado Erazo, C. P., & Bollain Parra, L. (2025). Impact of digitalization on sustainable tourism: Emerging trends and future perspectives. Management Decision, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2025-0813
40. Xiang, Z., & Gretzel, U. (2010). Role of social media in online travel information search. Tourism Management, 31(2), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.016
41. Yeoman, I. (2025). Editorial: The role of technology in shaping the future of tourism. Journal of Tourism Futures, 11(2), 166-170. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-06-2025-316