Research Article

Adjustment and commitment in tourism higher education: A mixed-method examination of change over time

Volume: 11 Number: 2 August 30, 2026

Adjustment and commitment in tourism higher education: A mixed-method examination of change over time

Abstract

Student adjustment to university life and commitment to higher education are critical for retention and academic success, yet little is known about how these constructs change across the first semester or how course-based interventions influence them in tourism education. This study examines changes in tourism students' adjustment and commitment following a compulsory first-semester "Adaptation to University Life" course, using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. Study 1 followed 127 first-year students from gastronomy and culinary arts, tourism guidance, and recreation management programs at a Turkish state university. Adjustment (personal, social, academic) and commitment to higher education were measured at the beginning and end of the semester using validated scales, and within-cohort change was analyzed with the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test. Study 2 explored the dynamics underlying the observed changes through semi-structured interviews with 20 students drawn from the same cohort, analyzed thematically. Quantitative findings indicated a significant decrease across all dimensions over the semester. Qualitative findings suggested that growing awareness of academic demands, professional realities of the tourism sector, and constraints of the peripheral campus prompted students to reassess their initial expectations. The study contributes longitudinal evidence on adjustment and commitment in tourism education and suggests that adaptation courses may function as awareness-raising mechanisms rather than immediate enhancers of adjustment, with implications for course design and student-support practice.

Keywords

University adjustment, Commitment to higher education, Tourism students, Longitudinal mixed-methods research, First-year adaptation course.

References

  1. Akdağ, M., & Tok, H. (2008). Geleneksel Öğretim ile PowerPoint Sunum Destekli Öğretimin Öğrenci Erişisine Etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 33(47), 26–34.
  2. Alnaim, M. M., Alshenaifi, M., Noaime, E., Albaqawy, G., Abuhussain, M. A., & Abdelhafez, M. H. H. (2025). Campus urbanism in peripheral cities: Enhancing social engagement and sustainable investment in Hail University, Saudi Arabia. Frontiers in Built Environment, 11, 1607015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2025.1607015
  3. Aslan, S. (2015). Üniversite Yaşamına Uyum Ölçeği’nin Geliştirilmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(4), 132–145.
  4. Bean, J. P. (1983). The application of a model of turnover in work organizations to the student attrition process. The review of higher education, 6(2), 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1983.0026
  5. Bean, J. P. (1985). Interaction effects based on class level in an explanatory model of college student dropout syndrome. American educational research journal, 22(1), 35-64. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312022001035
  6. Braxton, J. M., Milem, J. F., & Sullivan, A. S. (2000). The influence of active learning on the college student departure process toward a revision of Tinto’s theory. Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 569–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2000.11778853
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  8. Bülbül, T., & Güvendir, M. A. (2014). Üniversite birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin yükseköğretim yaşamına uyum düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.12973/jesr.2014.41.21
  9. Cabrera, A. F., Nora, A., & Castañeda, M. B. (1993). College persistence: Structural equations modeling test of an integrated model of student retention. The journal of higher education, 64(2), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1993.11778419
  10. Çınkır, Ş., Kurum, G., & Yıldız, S. (2021). Yükseköğretimde Öğrenci Bağlılığı Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 10(1), 273–298. https://doi.org/10.30703/CIJE.717825
APA
Küçükergin, F. N. (2026). Adjustment and commitment in tourism higher education: A mixed-method examination of change over time. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Tourism, 11(2), 373-386. https://doi.org/10.31822/jomat.2026-11-2-373
AMA
1.Küçükergin FN. Adjustment and commitment in tourism higher education: A mixed-method examination of change over time. Jomat. 2026;11(2):373-386. doi:10.31822/jomat.2026-11-2-373
Chicago
Küçükergin, Fulden N. 2026. “Adjustment and Commitment in Tourism Higher Education: A Mixed-Method Examination of Change over Time”. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Tourism 11 (2): 373-86. https://doi.org/10.31822/jomat.2026-11-2-373.
EndNote
Küçükergin FN (August 1, 2026) Adjustment and commitment in tourism higher education: A mixed-method examination of change over time. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Tourism 11 2 373–386.
IEEE
[1]F. N. Küçükergin, “Adjustment and commitment in tourism higher education: A mixed-method examination of change over time”, Jomat, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 373–386, Aug. 2026, doi: 10.31822/jomat.2026-11-2-373.
ISNAD
Küçükergin, Fulden N. “Adjustment and Commitment in Tourism Higher Education: A Mixed-Method Examination of Change over Time”. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Tourism 11/2 (August 1, 2026): 373-386. https://doi.org/10.31822/jomat.2026-11-2-373.
JAMA
1.Küçükergin FN. Adjustment and commitment in tourism higher education: A mixed-method examination of change over time. Jomat. 2026;11:373–386.
MLA
Küçükergin, Fulden N. “Adjustment and Commitment in Tourism Higher Education: A Mixed-Method Examination of Change over Time”. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Tourism, vol. 11, no. 2, Aug. 2026, pp. 373-86, doi:10.31822/jomat.2026-11-2-373.
Vancouver
1.Fulden N Küçükergin. Adjustment and commitment in tourism higher education: A mixed-method examination of change over time. Jomat. 2026 Aug. 1;11(2):373-86. doi:10.31822/jomat.2026-11-2-373