Bipolar bozukluk bilgilendirmesinde kaynak olarak YouTube videolarının incelenmesi

Abstract

Amaçlar: Çalışmamızda amaç, Bipolar Bozukluk hakkında bilgi sunan Türkçe ve İngilizce YouTube videolarının niteliklerini ve güvenilirliklerini değerlendirmek ve bu videoların izleyiciler için ne kadar faydalı olduğunu değerlendirmektir. Yöntemler: Çalışmamızda, ilk üç sayfanın sonuçlarında görünen toplam 120 video değerlendirildi; bunun 60'ı Türkçe ve 60'ı İngilizce olarak yayınlandı. Tamamen veya kısmen alıntı yapılan ve tekrarlanan videolar puanlanmadı, ancak daha önce yayınlanan videolar dahil edildi. Toplamda 80 video çalışmaya dahil edildi. Türkçe ve İngilizce olarak yayınlanan videolar bir psikiyatrist tarafından izlendi ve değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Videoların önemli bir kısmı sağlık kuruluşları (29.3%) veya bir profesyonel (psikiyatrist/psikolog) (28%) tarafından yüklenmişti. Tüm videolar değerlendirildiğinde, Modifiye DISCERN skorunun ortancası 3.48 (IQR: 1), Global Quality Scale (GQS) skorunun ortancası 3.67 (IQR: 1), toplam video içerik skorunun ortancası 4.00 (IQR: 2) ve Video Power Index (VPI) skorunun ortancası 67.14 (IQR: 207) olarak bulundu. Video kalitesini değerlendirmek için kullanılan ölçekleri karşılaştırırken, VPI skorunun (p<0.001) İngilizce videolarda Türkçe videolara göre anlamlı derecede yüksek olduğu, GQS skorunun (p=0.116) ve modifiye DISCERN ölçeği skorunun (p=0.594) benzer olduğu bulundu. Sonuç: İncelenen videoların ortalama 70,000 izlenmeye ulaştığı, en yükseğinin yaklaşık 13.5 milyon izlenmeye ulaştığı gözlemlendi. Bu veriler, internetin ve YouTube'un hastalar için sağlık bilgisine erişimde önemli bir rol oynadığını göstermektedir. Bu çalışmada, Bipolar Bozukluk ile ilgili YouTube videolarının ortalama-iyi bir kaliteye ve güvenilirliğe sahip olduğu tespit edildi.

Keywords

• Bipolar Bozukluk
• Zihinsel Hastalıklar
• İnternet
• YouTube
• Hasta Eğitimi

Reviewing YouTube as a source of information on bipolar disorder

Abstract

Aims: Assess the qualities and reliabilities of Turkish and English YouTube videos providing information about Bipolar Disorder and how beneficial they are for viewers in our study. Methods: In our study, a total of 120 videos were evaluated, with 60 in Turkish and 60 in English, which appeared on the first three pages of search results. Videos that were entirely or partially quoted and repeated were not rated, but videos with an earlier publication date were included. A total of 80 videos were included in the study. Videos published in Turkish and English were watched and rated by a psychiatrist. Results: Significant portion of the videos were uploaded by healthcare institutions (29.3%) or a professional (psychiatrist/psychologist) (28%). When all videos were evaluated, the median Modified DISCERN score was 3.48 (IQR: 1), the median GQS (Global Quality Scale) score was 3.67 (IQR: 1), the median total video content score was 4.00 (IQR: 2), and the median VPI (Video Power Index) score was 67.14 (IQR: 207).When comparing the scales used to assess the quality of videos, it was found that the VPI score (p<0.001) was significantly higher in English-language videos compared to Turkish-language videos, while the GQS score (p=0.116) and the modified DISCERN scale score (p=0.594) were similar Conclusion: It was observed that the examined videos reached an average of 70,000 views, with the highest reaching approximately 13.5 million views. These data demonstrate the significant role of the internet and YouTube in providing access to health information for patients. In this study, it was determined that YouTube videos related to Bipolar Disorder have an average to good quality and reliability.

Keywords

• Bipolar Disorder
• Mental Disorder
• Internet
• Patient Education
• YouTube
• YouTube

References

1. Korkmaz ŞA, Kızgın S. Neutrophil/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), monocyte/HDL and platelet/HDL ratios are increased in acute mania as markers of inflammation, even after controlling for confounding factors. Curr Med Res Opin. 2023;39(10):1383-1390. doi:10.1080/03007995.2023.2260302
2. Korkmaz ŞA, Kızgın S, Oğuz EF, Neşelioğlu S, Erel Ö. Thiol-disulphide homeostasis, ischemia-modified albumin, complete blood count-derived inflammatory markers and C-reactive protein from acute mania to early remission in bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2023;339:426-434. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.07.079
3. Merikangas KR, Akiskal HS, Angst J, et al. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of bipolar spectrum disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(5):543-552. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.64.5.543
4. Aslam S. YouTube by the Numbers (2020): Stats, Demographics & Fun Facts [Internet]. [cited 2020 Apr13]. Available from: https://www.omnicoreagency.com/youtube-statistics/
5. Chen X, Hay JL, Waters EA, et al. Health literacy and use and trust in health information. J Health Commun. 2018;23(8):724-734.
6. Jacobs W, Amuta AO, Jeon KC. Health information seeking in the digital age: An analysis of health information seeking behavior among US adults. Cogent Soc Sci. 2017;3(1):1302785.
7. Mamlin BW, Tierney WM. The promise of information and communication technology in healthcare: extracting value from the chaos. Am J Med Sci. 2016;351(1):59-68. doi:10.1016/j.amjms.2015.10.015
8. YouTube. Terms of Service. https://www.youtube.com/static?template=terms.

9. Nour MM, Nour MH, Tsatalou OM, Barrera A. Schizophrenia on YouTube. Psychiatr Serv. 2017;68(1):70-74. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201500541
10. Gabarron E, Fernandez-Luque L, Armayones M, Lau AY. Identifying measures used for assessing quality of YouTube videos with patient health information: a review of current literature. Interact J Med Res. 2013;2(1):e2465.
11. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: a systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2015;21(3):173-194. doi:10.1177/1460458213512220
12. Farag M, Bolton D, Lawrentschuk N. Use of YouTube as a Resource for surgical education-clarity or confusion. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6(3):445-449. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2019.09.017
13. Lam NHT, Tsiang JTH, Woo BKP. Exploring the Role of YouTube in Disseminating Psychoeducation. Acad Psychiatry. Springer International Publishing; 2017;41(6):819–822.
14. Lam NHT, Woo BKP. Efficacy of Instagram in promoting psychoeducation in the Chinese-Speaking population. Health Equity. 2020;4(1):114-116. doi:10.1089/heq.2019.0078
15. Lam NHT, Woo BKP. Efficacy of instagram in promoting psychoeducation in the Chinese-Speaking population. Health Equity 2020;4(1):114-116.
16. Szmuda T, Özdemir C, Fedorow K, Ali S, Słoniewski P. YouTube as a source of information for narcolepsy: a content-quality and optimization analysis. J Sleep Res. 2021;30(2):e13053. doi:10.1111/jsr.13053
17. Szmuda, T., Żydowicz, W. M., Ali, S., Fedorow, K., Słoniewski, P. YouTube as a source of patient information for bipolar disorder: a content-quality and optimization analysis. J Psychiatry Ment Health. 2021;6(2).
18. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wakeup call?. J Rheumatol. 2012;39(5):899-903.
19. Van den Eynde J, Crauwels A, Demaerel PG, et al. YouTube Videos as a Source of Information About Immunology for Medical Students: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Med Educ. 2019;5(1):e12605. doi:10.2196/12605
20. Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(9):2070-2077. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01325.x
21. Health Research Authority. http://www.hra-decisiontools.org.uk/research/ Accessed August 21, 2018.
22. Kocyigit BF, Akaltun MS, Sahin AR. YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19 and rheumatic disease link. Clin Rheumatol. 2020;39(7):2049-2054. doi:10.1007/s10067-020-05176-3
23. Nason GJ, Kelly P, Kelly ME, et al. YouTube as an educational tool regarding male urethral catheterization. Scand J Urol. 2014;49(2):189–192.
24. Şahin A, Şahin M, Türkcü FM. YouTube as a source of information in retinopathy of prematurity. Ir J Med Sci. 2019;188(2):613-617.
25. Fox S. Online health search 2006. Pew Internet and American Life Project. [Internet. Accessed January 26, 2012.] Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2006/Online-Health-Search-2006.aspx
26. Nestor PJ, Scheltens P, Hodges JR. Advances in the early detection of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Med. 2004;10Suppl:S34-S41. doi:10.1038/nrn1433
27. Friedman DB, Laditka JN, Hunter R, et al. Getting the message out about cognitive health: a cross-cultural comparison of older adults’ media awareness and communication needs on how to maintain a healthy brain. Gerontologist. 2009;49(1):50-60.
28. Abdelmseih M. Evaluation and Reliability of YouTube Videos for Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)-A Warning Sign!. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;7:595.
29. Manning P. YouTube,‘drug videos’ and drugs education. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy. 2013;20(2):120-130.
30. Ocak U. Evaluation of the content, quality, reliability and accuracy of YouTube videos regarding endotracheal intubation techniques. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018;21(12):1651-1655. doi:10.4103/njcp.njcp_207_18
31. Kılınç DD. Is the information about orthodontics on Youtube and TikTok reliable for the oral health of the public? A cross sectional comparative study. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;123(5):e349-e354.
32. Oliphant T. User engagement with mental health videos on YouTube. J Canadian Health Libraries Association/J de l’Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada. 2013;34(3):153-158.
33. Osman W, Mohamed F, Elhassan M, Shoufan A. Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):382.