Research Article

Outcomes and predictors of malignancy in radiologically non-adenomatous adrenal lesions: a retrospective study

Volume: 6 Number: 4 August 31, 2025
EN TR

Outcomes and predictors of malignancy in radiologically non-adenomatous adrenal lesions: a retrospective study

Abstract

Aims: To compare the clinical, radiological, functional, and pathological characteristics of radiologically diagnosed adrenal adenomas versus non-adenomatous lesions and to identify predictors of malignancy and clinical significance among the nonadenomatous group. Methods: This retrospective study included 63 adult patients who underwent adrenalectomy between January 2015 and December 2024. Patients were classified based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports as having either radiologically suspected adrenal adenoma or non-adenomatous lesions. Clinical features, comorbidities, hormonal function, imaging characteristics, and histopathological outcomes were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed within the non-adenomatous group to identify independent predictors of malignancy and clinical relevance. ROC curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic utility of tumor size. Results: Of the 63 patients, 29 (46.0%) were classified as adrenal adenomas and 34 (54.0%) as non-adenomatous lesions. Tumor size was significantly smaller in the adenoma group (mean 27.1±6.8 mm vs. 48.5±13.7 mm, p<0.001). Functional tumors were more prevalent in the adenoma group (93.1% vs. 41.2%, p<0.001). Malignancy (adrenocortical carcinoma and metastasis) was observed exclusively in the non-adenomatous group. Within this group, functional lesions were independently associated with malignancy (p=0.019, OR=8.95). ROC analysis showed moderate diagnostic value of tumor size for predicting malignancy (AUC=0.648, 95% CI: 0.372–0.924). Histopathological confirmation showed perfect concordance in the adenoma group (positive predictive value 100%). The adenoma group had higher rates of hypertension (p=0.013) and coronary artery disease (p=0.012). Conclusion: Radiologically non-adenomatous adrenal lesions are more likely to be malignant than radiologically diagnosed adenomas. Tumor size and functional status can aid in malignancy prediction within this subgroup. Radiologic classification offers high specificity, particularly for adenomas, and may guide preoperative risk stratification.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

• Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

Ethical Statement

DISCLOSURE OF ETHICAL STATEMENTS • Approval of the research protocol: Approved by the Ethics Committee of Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University (approval date: June 10, 2025; decision number: 24-MOBAEK-211). • Informed Consent: N/A (due to retrospective study design). • Approval date of Registry and the Registration No. of the study/trial: N/A (not a registered clinical trial). • Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support. • Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. • Author Contributions: : All of the authors declare that they have all participated in design, execution, and analysis of the paper and that they have approved the final version

References

  1. Young WF Jr. Clinical practice. The incidentally discovered adrenal mass. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(6):601-610. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp065470
  2. Cawood TJ, Hunt PJ, O'Shea D, Cole D, Soule S. Recommended evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas is costly, has high false-positive rates and confers a risk of fatal cancer similar to the risk of the adrenal lesion becoming malignant; time for a rethink? Eur J Endocrinol. 2009; 161(4):513-527. doi:10.1530/EJE-09-0234
  3. Fassnacht M, Arlt W, Bancos I, et al. Management of adrenal incidentalomas: European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline in collaboration with the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;175(2):G1-G34. doi:10.1530/EJE-16-0467
  4. Young WF Jr. Diagnosis and treatment of primary aldosteronism: practical clinical perspectives. J Intern Med. 2019;285(2):126-148. doi: 10.1111/joim.12831
  5. Elhassan YS, Alahdab F, Prete A, et al. Natural history of adrenal incidentalomas with and without mild autonomous cortisol excess: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(2):107-116. doi:10.7326/M18-3630
  6. Song JH, Chaudhry FS, Mayo-Smith WW. The incidental adrenal mass on CT: prevalence of adrenal disease in 1,049 consecutive adrenal masses in patients with no known malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(6):1163-1168. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.2799
  7. Lanoix J, Djelouah M, Chocardelle L, et al. Differentiation between heterogeneous adrenal adenoma and non-adenoma adrenal lesion with CT and MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022;47(4):1379-1391. doi:10.1007/s00261-022-03409-4
  8. Bancos I, Tamhane S, Shah M, et al. The diagnostic performance of adrenal imaging in predicting malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;175(4):R153-R165. doi:10.1530/EJE-16-0335

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Endocrinology

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

August 30, 2025

Publication Date

August 31, 2025

Submission Date

July 17, 2025

Acceptance Date

August 2, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 6 Number: 4

APA
Çatak, M., & Koca, B. (2025). Outcomes and predictors of malignancy in radiologically non-adenomatous adrenal lesions: a retrospective study. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care, 6(4), 377-382. https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1744560
AMA
1.Çatak M, Koca B. Outcomes and predictors of malignancy in radiologically non-adenomatous adrenal lesions: a retrospective study. J Med Palliat Care / JOMPAC / jompac. 2025;6(4):377-382. doi:10.47582/jompac.1744560
Chicago
Çatak, Merve, and Bülent Koca. 2025. “Outcomes and Predictors of Malignancy in Radiologically Non-Adenomatous Adrenal Lesions: A Retrospective Study”. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care 6 (4): 377-82. https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1744560.
EndNote
Çatak M, Koca B (August 1, 2025) Outcomes and predictors of malignancy in radiologically non-adenomatous adrenal lesions: a retrospective study. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care 6 4 377–382.
IEEE
[1]M. Çatak and B. Koca, “Outcomes and predictors of malignancy in radiologically non-adenomatous adrenal lesions: a retrospective study”, J Med Palliat Care / JOMPAC / jompac, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 377–382, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.47582/jompac.1744560.
ISNAD
Çatak, Merve - Koca, Bülent. “Outcomes and Predictors of Malignancy in Radiologically Non-Adenomatous Adrenal Lesions: A Retrospective Study”. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care 6/4 (August 1, 2025): 377-382. https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1744560.
JAMA
1.Çatak M, Koca B. Outcomes and predictors of malignancy in radiologically non-adenomatous adrenal lesions: a retrospective study. J Med Palliat Care / JOMPAC / jompac. 2025;6:377–382.
MLA
Çatak, Merve, and Bülent Koca. “Outcomes and Predictors of Malignancy in Radiologically Non-Adenomatous Adrenal Lesions: A Retrospective Study”. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care, vol. 6, no. 4, Aug. 2025, pp. 377-82, doi:10.47582/jompac.1744560.
Vancouver
1.Merve Çatak, Bülent Koca. Outcomes and predictors of malignancy in radiologically non-adenomatous adrenal lesions: a retrospective study. J Med Palliat Care / JOMPAC / jompac. 2025 Aug. 1;6(4):377-82. doi:10.47582/jompac.1744560

TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1d)

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
 


 

download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiVHJfSW5kZXhfbG9nby5wbmciLCJwYXRoIjoiN2EzMC84NTVhL2UyMWMvNjlkZjRkZmVhNTUyNTYuNzg3NjU2ODgucG5nIiwiZXhwIjoxNzc2MjQ1Nzc0LCJub25jZSI6IjU0MDZkMWE2NmE1Y2QwZTJjNGYyNDA1OTM2MTE0YWIxIn0.Tt-WScFXTj5r2jji5eDMFApNzujLMjMPl8ivXRbozSI



f9ab67f.png
asos-index.png


 


download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiQ3Jvc3NyZWYuanBnIiwicGF0aCI6IjAzMzEvMTdkZi8yN2ZkLzY5ZGY0ZThhMDZkMjg0LjQxMjAyNDg5LmpwZyIsImV4cCI6MTc3NjI0NTkxNCwibm9uY2UiOiI2NjM1Yjc5MWFiY2I1MDQ0NjkzMTAxMDhjY2Y2NzRlMCJ9.5jDQBEY-KErkDK1QjDmv9ichOkNIn5CWYibe1Wz1644
icmje_1_orig.png
 
cc.logo.large.png
 
ncbi.png
 
google-scholar.pngpn6krf5.jpg
 


 

Our journal is in TR-Dizin, DRJI (Directory of Research Journals Indexing, General Impact Factor, Google Scholar, Researchgate, CrossRef (DOI), ROAD, ASOS Index, Turk Medline Index, Eurasian Scientific Journal Index (ESJI), and Turkiye Citation Index.

EBSCO, DOAJ, OAJI and ProQuest Index are in process of evaluation. 

 

Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"