Research Article

The impact of preoperative CEA and CA 19-9 levels on early and late postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma

Volume: 7 Number: 2 March 27, 2026

The impact of preoperative CEA and CA 19-9 levels on early and late postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma

Abstract

Aims: The prognostic value of preoperative serum tumor markers in gastric cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the association of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) levels with clinicopathological characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and overall survival in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. Patients with stage IV disease or those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Preoperative CEA and CA 19-9 levels were categorized according to standard cutoff values. Clinicopathological characteristics, postoperative complications, resection margin status, and overall survival were analyzed. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox and logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of outcomes. Results: A total of 126 patients were included. Elevated preoperative CEA and CA 19-9 levels were observed in 10.3% and 18.3% of patients, respectively. Elevated CA 19-9 levels were significantly associated with advanced tumor depth (T3–4), lymph node metastasis, and lymphovascular invasion, whereas CEA levels showed no significant association with clinicopathological features. Conversion to open surgery was required in 15 patients (11.9%). Major postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥III) occurred in 2.4% of patients and were independently associated with an ASA score ≥3. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that neither CEA nor CA 19-9 levels independently predicted postoperative complications or positive resection margins. During follow-up, 37 deaths were recorded. Overall survival did not differ significantly according to preoperative CEA or CA 19-9 levels. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, pathological stage III was the only independent predictor of overall survival. Conclusion: Preoperative CA 19-9 levels are associated with aggressive pathological features in gastric cancer but do not independently predict overall survival, postoperative morbidity, or resection margin status in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. Serum tumor markers should be interpreted as indicators of tumor burden rather than independent prognostic factors.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

No funding

Ethical Statement

Ethics Committee Approval: This study was approved by the İnönü University Health Sciences Scientific Research Ethics Committee (Protocol No: 2026/9204) All patient data were anonymized in compliance with confidentiality rules. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles stated in the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed Consent: As the study was designed retrospectively, written informed consent was not obtained from patients. Peer Review Process: Externally peer-reviewed. Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Financial Disclosure Statement: The authors declare that this study received no financial support. Author Contributions: All authors declare that they contributed to the design, execution, and analysis of the article and approved the final version.

References

  1. Luan F, Xu S, Chen K, et al. Prognostic effect of CEA, AFP, CA19 9 and CA242 for recurrence/metastasis of gastric cancer following radical gastrectomy. Mol Clin Oncol. 2024;22(2):17. doi:10.3892/mco.2024.2812
  2. Qiu X, Shen C, Zhao W, et al. Prognostic value of the combination of HB (hemoglobin) and CEA in resectable gastric cancer. J Cancer. 2022;13(7): 2246-2257. doi:10.7150/jca.67600
  3. Aksoy A. Mide karsinomunda prediktif faktörler. Genel Tıp Derg. 2016; 26(1):1-7. doi:10.15321/GenelTipDer.20162618129
  4. Bozan MB, Kanat BH, Yazar FM, et al. Mide kanseri hastalarında preoperatif CEA, AFP ve CA-19.9 düzeylerinin değerlendirilmesi. KSÜ Tıp Fakültesi Derg. 2015;10(3):132-115. doi:10.17576/ksutfd.2015.10. 3. 132115
  5. Shibata C, Nakano T, Yasumoto A, et al. Comparison of CEA and CA19-9 as a predictive factor for recurrence after curative gastrectomy in gastric cancer. BMC Surg. 2022;22(1):213. doi:10.1186/s12893-022-01667-z
  6. Li J, Zhao H, Zhang Q, Ren S. Combined albumin and CEA improve prognostic prediction in resectable gastric cancer. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1): 33118. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-18102-x
  7. Bayrak M, Ölmez ÖF, Kurt E, et al. The relationship between pre-treatment serum levels of AFP, CEA and CA 19-9 and clinicopathological factors in patients with locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer. Uludağ Tıp Derg. 2011;37(3):139-143.
  8. Clavien PA, Barkun J, Dindo D, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187-196. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Gastroenterology Surgery, General Surgery

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 27, 2026

Submission Date

January 15, 2026

Acceptance Date

February 16, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 7 Number: 2

APA
Kocaaslan, H., & Sümer, F. (2026). The impact of preoperative CEA and CA 19-9 levels on early and late postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care, 7(2), 198-203. https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1860634
AMA
1.Kocaaslan H, Sümer F. The impact of preoperative CEA and CA 19-9 levels on early and late postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. J Med Palliat Care / JOMPAC / jompac. 2026;7(2):198-203. doi:10.47582/jompac.1860634
Chicago
Kocaaslan, Hüseyin, and Fatih Sümer. 2026. “The Impact of Preoperative CEA and CA 19-9 Levels on Early and Late Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma”. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care 7 (2): 198-203. https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1860634.
EndNote
Kocaaslan H, Sümer F (March 1, 2026) The impact of preoperative CEA and CA 19-9 levels on early and late postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care 7 2 198–203.
IEEE
[1]H. Kocaaslan and F. Sümer, “The impact of preoperative CEA and CA 19-9 levels on early and late postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma”, J Med Palliat Care / JOMPAC / jompac, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 198–203, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.47582/jompac.1860634.
ISNAD
Kocaaslan, Hüseyin - Sümer, Fatih. “The Impact of Preoperative CEA and CA 19-9 Levels on Early and Late Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma”. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care 7/2 (March 1, 2026): 198-203. https://doi.org/10.47582/jompac.1860634.
JAMA
1.Kocaaslan H, Sümer F. The impact of preoperative CEA and CA 19-9 levels on early and late postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. J Med Palliat Care / JOMPAC / jompac. 2026;7:198–203.
MLA
Kocaaslan, Hüseyin, and Fatih Sümer. “The Impact of Preoperative CEA and CA 19-9 Levels on Early and Late Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma”. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care, vol. 7, no. 2, Mar. 2026, pp. 198-03, doi:10.47582/jompac.1860634.
Vancouver
1.Hüseyin Kocaaslan, Fatih Sümer. The impact of preoperative CEA and CA 19-9 levels on early and late postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. J Med Palliat Care / JOMPAC / jompac. 2026 Mar. 1;7(2):198-203. doi:10.47582/jompac.1860634

TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1d)

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
 


 

download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiVHJfSW5kZXhfbG9nby5wbmciLCJwYXRoIjoiN2EzMC84NTVhL2UyMWMvNjlkZjRkZmVhNTUyNTYuNzg3NjU2ODgucG5nIiwiZXhwIjoxNzc2MjQ1Nzc0LCJub25jZSI6IjU0MDZkMWE2NmE1Y2QwZTJjNGYyNDA1OTM2MTE0YWIxIn0.Tt-WScFXTj5r2jji5eDMFApNzujLMjMPl8ivXRbozSI



f9ab67f.png
asos-index.png


 


download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiQ3Jvc3NyZWYuanBnIiwicGF0aCI6IjAzMzEvMTdkZi8yN2ZkLzY5ZGY0ZThhMDZkMjg0LjQxMjAyNDg5LmpwZyIsImV4cCI6MTc3NjI0NTkxNCwibm9uY2UiOiI2NjM1Yjc5MWFiY2I1MDQ0NjkzMTAxMDhjY2Y2NzRlMCJ9.5jDQBEY-KErkDK1QjDmv9ichOkNIn5CWYibe1Wz1644
icmje_1_orig.png
 
cc.logo.large.png
 
ncbi.png
 
google-scholar.pngpn6krf5.jpg
 


 

Our journal is in TR-Dizin, DRJI (Directory of Research Journals Indexing, General Impact Factor, Google Scholar, Researchgate, CrossRef (DOI), ROAD, ASOS Index, Turk Medline Index, Eurasian Scientific Journal Index (ESJI), and Turkiye Citation Index.

EBSCO, DOAJ, OAJI and ProQuest Index are in process of evaluation. 

 

Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"