Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA): a bibliometric analysis of research trends and scientific collaboration

Year 2026, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 401 - 407, 27.03.2026

Alper Varman

https://izlik.org/JA76HM42TN

Abstract

Aims: Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) has gained prominence as a minimally invasive thyroid surgery technique. Although the TOETVA literature has expanded substantially, no bibliometric study has comprehensively evaluated its structural, thematic, and collaborative characteristics. This study aims to perform a bibliometric analysis of TOETVA-related publications to describe the academic development of the field, identify influential contributors, highlight key sources, and assess international collaboration patterns.
Methods: Publications related to TOETVA indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection were analyzed using bibliometric methods. Bibliometrix (R-based) and VOSviewer software were used to evaluate publication output, productive authors, countries, citation patterns, collaboration networks, and keyword co-occurrence and thematic structures.
Results: The analysis demonstrated a rapid expansion of the TOETVA literature since 2016, with a marked increase in publication volume over the past five years. Thailand, China, the United States, and Turkiye were the most productive countries. Angkoon Anuwong, who originally described the technique, emerged as the most influential author, alongside researchers from multiple regions. Collaboration analyses revealed well-defined research networks centered around specific institutions, while international collaboration remained limited in some regions. Keyword analysis showed that “TOETVA,” “scarless thyroidectomy,” “minimally invasive surgery,” and “papillary thyroid carcinoma” were the most frequently used terms. Thematic mapping indicated a primary focus on technical aspects, complication management, and oncologic outcomes.
Conclusion: These findings indicate that the TOETVA literature is rapidly evolving but remains concentrated around a limited number of countries and leading researchers. Identified thematic gaps may guide future research directions.

Keywords

Thyroidectomy , endoscopy , minimally invasive surgical procedures

Ethical Statement

As this study is based solely on openly accessible bibliometric data and does not involve any individual patient information, ethical committee approval was not required.

References

• Anuwong A. Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach: a series of the first 60 human cases. World J Surg. 2016;40(3):491-497. doi:10.1007/s00268-015-3320-1
• Russell JO, Razavi CR, Shaear M, et al. Transoral thyroidectomy: safety and outcomes of a novel surgical approach. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(11): 1046-1052. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1153
• Anuwong A, Ketwong K, Jitpratoom P, et al. Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(1): 456-463. doi:10.1007/s00464-017-5705-8
• Dionigi G, Bacuzzi A, Lavazza M, et al. Safety of transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA): learning curve and complications. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020;30(3):267-273. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0561
• Aria M, Cuccurullo C. bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr. 2017;11(4):959-975. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
• Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. Science mapping software tools: review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2011;62(7):1382-1402. doi:10.1002/asi. 21525
• Wang Y, Li Y, Li J, et al. A bibliometric analysis of rheumatology research. J Rheumatol. 2020;47(4):580-587. doi:10.3899/jrheum.190835
• Zhao Y, Li J, Chen Y, et al. Scientific collaboration and research impact: a bibliometric study. Scientometrics. 2021;126(9):7391-7410. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04077-2
• Zhang L, Li Y, Wang X, et al. Bibliometric trends of artificial intelligence applications in healthcare. Front Public Health. 2022;10:855233. doi:10. 3389/fpubh.2022.855233
• Zhang Z, Chen Q, Li X, et al. A bibliometric analysis of publications on COVID-19 and cancer. JCO Glob Oncol. 2020;6:1315-1325. doi:10.1200/GO.20.00305
• Chen C, Dubin R, Kim MC. Orphan drugs and rare diseases: a scientometric review (2000–2014). Expert Opin Orphan Drugs. 2014; 2(7):709-724. doi:10.1517/21678707.2014.920251
• Fry CV, Cai X, Zhang Y, Wagner CS. Consolidation in a crisis: patterns of international collaboration in early COVID-19 research. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0236307. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236307
• Glänzel W, Schubert A. Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In: Moed HF, Glänzel W, Schmoch U, eds. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Dordrecht: Springer; 2005:257-276.
• Lotka AJ. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. J Wash Acad Sci. 1926;16(12):317-323.
• Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in the production of knowledge. Science. 2007;316(5827):1036-1039. doi:10. 1126/science.1136099
• Adams J. The fourth age of research. Nature. 2013;497(7451):557-560. doi:10.1038/497557a
• Larivière V, Gingras Y, Archambault É. The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900–2007. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2009;60(4):858-862. doi:10.1002/asi.21011
• Archambault É, Côté G. International collaboration in the social sciences and humanities: a bibliometric analysis. Science-Metrix Final Report. 2010.
• Wagner CS, Roessner JD, Bobb K, et al. Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research: a review of the literature. J Informetr. 2011;5(1):14-26. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.004
• van Leeuwen TN, Moed HF, Tijssen RJW, Visser MS, van Raan AFJ. Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance. Scientometrics. 2001;51(1):335-346. doi:10.1023/A: 1010628113632
• Callon M, Courtial JP, Laville F. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics. 1991;22(1):155-205. doi:10.1007/BF02096664
• Dionigi G, Bacuzzi A, Lavazza M, et al. Safety and outcomes of transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach: a prospective multicenter study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020;30(3):267-273. doi:10.1089/lap.2019.0562
• Zhang D, Park JH, Sun H, Kim HY. Robotic transoral thyroidectomy versus conventional TOETVA: a comparative study. Surg Endosc. 2022; 36(1):54-63. doi:10.1007/s00464-021-08301-7
• Zhang D, Sun H, Kim HY, et al. Cosmetic outcomes in scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy: a meta-analysis. Head Neck. 2021;43(2):400-409. doi:10.1002/hed.26492
• Kim HY, Chai YJ, Dionigi G, Anuwong A, Richmon JD. Transoral robotic thyroidectomy: a global experience. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2020; 98(2):55-62. doi:10.4174/astr.2020.98.2.55
• Dionigi G, Tufano RP, Russell J, et al. The learning curve for transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach: a multicenter experience. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(2):1235-1242. doi:10.1007/s00464-020-07535-6
• Kakaç M, Akbulut S, et al. Ethical and economic aspects of novel surgical approaches: where do we stand on TOETVA? J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2023;16:17. doi:10.18502/jmehm.v16i17.12359
• Chai YJ, Kim HY, Dionigi G, et al. Surgical safety and complications of transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy: a review of the literature. Gland Surg. 2020;9(1):101-110. doi:10.21037/gs.2019.11.02
• Lee HY, Kim JS, Lee SH, et al. Robotic-assisted TOETVA: early outcomes and learning curve. Surg Innov. 2022;29(3):415-423. doi:10. 1177/15533506211065308
• Senapati PS, Shankar A, Peckham-Cooper A. Bibliometric analysis of minimally invasive surgery: predicting future research trends. Int J Surg. 2019;62:29-35. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.01.016