Research Article

Assessment of healthcare professionals’ knowledge levels in blood transfusion practices: a systematic review

Volume: 7 Number: 3 June 25, 2026

Assessment of healthcare professionals’ knowledge levels in blood transfusion practices: a systematic review

Abstract

Aims: This systematic review aimed to assess healthcare professionals’ knowledge levels regarding blood transfusion practices and evaluate the existing literature. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar using predefined keywords such as “blood,” “blood transfusion,” “nurse,” “information,” “education,” and “healthcare professional.” Studies published between 2000 and 2025, available in full text, in English and meeting inclusion criteria were included. After screening, 42 studies were selected. Results: Findings showed the absence of a universally accepted, valid and reliable tool to assess knowledge and practices related to blood transfusion. Overall, knowledge and practice levels among nurses and other healthcare professionals were low to moderate. Major deficiencies were identified in post-transfusion monitoring, management of transfusion-related complications, and hemovigilance practices. Higher levels were associated with postgraduate education, longer experience, frequent involvement in transfusion procedures, availability of protocols and prior training. Educational interventions improved knowledge and skills; however, these effects may diminish without continuous reinforcement. Conclusion: Improving blood transfusion practices requires regular mandatory in service training. Additionally, expanding simulation-based education, standardizing protocols, enhancing electronic blood tracking systems, and integrating transfusion topics into healthcare curricula are recommended.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

None

Ethical Statement

Not applicable, as this study is a systematic review.

Thanks

The authors would like to thank all researchers whose studies were included in this systematic review.

References

  1. Abdelzaher MG, Mohammed FSA, Fahim SS, Elmwafie SM. Nurses’ knowledge of pediatric transfusion care. J Healthc Res. 2025;2(2):169 182. doi:10.21608/jhcr.2025.378538.1053
  2. World Health Organization. Global status report on blood safety and availability. WHO; 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240051683. Access date: 11.06.2026
  3. Annual Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT). Annual SHOT report. 2024. Available at: https://www.shotuk.org. Accessed March 18, 2026.
  4. Çetinkaya ŞY. Infection control and patient safety. ANKEM Derg. 2011; 25:17 20.
  5. Boukhris S, Chouchene S, Gaaloul M, et al. Training and blood transfusion knowledge. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2024;40(4): 682 686. doi:10.1007/s12288-024-01778-y
  6. Di Bartolomeo E, Merolle L, Marraccini C, et al. Patient blood management postoperatively. Blood Transfus. 2019;17(6):459 464. doi:10.2450/2019.0035-19
  7. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta analyses: the PRISMA statement. Phys Ther. 2009;89(9):873 880.
  8. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;134:103 112. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

​Internal Diseases Nursing​

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 25, 2026

Submission Date

March 18, 2026

Acceptance Date

June 19, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 7 Number: 3

APA
Kardaş Kin, Ö., & Akyol, A. (2026). Assessment of healthcare professionals’ knowledge levels in blood transfusion practices: a systematic review. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care, 7(3), 591-608. https://izlik.org/JA57GM32XP
AMA
1.Kardaş Kin Ö, Akyol A. Assessment of healthcare professionals’ knowledge levels in blood transfusion practices: a systematic review. J Med Palliat Care / JOMPAC / jompac. 2026;7(3):591-608. https://izlik.org/JA57GM32XP
Chicago
Kardaş Kin, Özlem, and Asiye Akyol. 2026. “Assessment of Healthcare Professionals’ Knowledge Levels in Blood Transfusion Practices: A Systematic Review”. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care 7 (3): 591-608. https://izlik.org/JA57GM32XP.
EndNote
Kardaş Kin Ö, Akyol A (June 1, 2026) Assessment of healthcare professionals’ knowledge levels in blood transfusion practices: a systematic review. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care 7 3 591–608.
IEEE
[1]Ö. Kardaş Kin and A. Akyol, “Assessment of healthcare professionals’ knowledge levels in blood transfusion practices: a systematic review”, J Med Palliat Care / JOMPAC / jompac, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 591–608, June 2026, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA57GM32XP
ISNAD
Kardaş Kin, Özlem - Akyol, Asiye. “Assessment of Healthcare Professionals’ Knowledge Levels in Blood Transfusion Practices: A Systematic Review”. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care 7/3 (June 1, 2026): 591-608. https://izlik.org/JA57GM32XP.
JAMA
1.Kardaş Kin Ö, Akyol A. Assessment of healthcare professionals’ knowledge levels in blood transfusion practices: a systematic review. J Med Palliat Care / JOMPAC / jompac. 2026;7:591–608.
MLA
Kardaş Kin, Özlem, and Asiye Akyol. “Assessment of Healthcare Professionals’ Knowledge Levels in Blood Transfusion Practices: A Systematic Review”. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care, vol. 7, no. 3, June 2026, pp. 591-08, https://izlik.org/JA57GM32XP.
Vancouver
1.Özlem Kardaş Kin, Asiye Akyol. Assessment of healthcare professionals’ knowledge levels in blood transfusion practices: a systematic review. J Med Palliat Care / JOMPAC / jompac [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 1;7(3):591-608. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA57GM32XP

TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1d)

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
 


 

download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiVHJfSW5kZXhfbG9nby5wbmciLCJwYXRoIjoiN2EzMC84NTVhL2UyMWMvNjlkZjRkZmVhNTUyNTYuNzg3NjU2ODgucG5nIiwiZXhwIjoxNzc2MjQ1Nzc0LCJub25jZSI6IjU0MDZkMWE2NmE1Y2QwZTJjNGYyNDA1OTM2MTE0YWIxIn0.Tt-WScFXTj5r2jji5eDMFApNzujLMjMPl8ivXRbozSI



f9ab67f.png
asos-index.png


 


download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiQ3Jvc3NyZWYuanBnIiwicGF0aCI6IjAzMzEvMTdkZi8yN2ZkLzY5ZGY0ZThhMDZkMjg0LjQxMjAyNDg5LmpwZyIsImV4cCI6MTc3NjI0NTkxNCwibm9uY2UiOiI2NjM1Yjc5MWFiY2I1MDQ0NjkzMTAxMDhjY2Y2NzRlMCJ9.5jDQBEY-KErkDK1QjDmv9ichOkNIn5CWYibe1Wz1644
icmje_1_orig.png
 
cc.logo.large.png
 
ncbi.png
 
google-scholar.pngpn6krf5.jpg
 


 

Our journal is in TR-Dizin, DRJI (Directory of Research Journals Indexing, General Impact Factor, Google Scholar, Researchgate, CrossRef (DOI), ROAD, ASOS Index, Turk Medline Index, Eurasian Scientific Journal Index (ESJI), and Turkiye Citation Index.

EBSCO, DOAJ, OAJI and ProQuest Index are in process of evaluation. 

 

Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"