Towards the end in energy policies consuming nature

Year 2018, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 25 - 33, 30.03.2018

Şafak Kaypak

Abstract

Energy policy, technology and economy are the
concepts that have to be paid attention together. There is a shortage of energy
resources. There are also a number of nature probes as well as a gradual
decline in energy reserves. Among them, greenhouse effect and climate change
are leading. That is, they require the production of energy politics at
national / international level, taking into account the interests of future
generations. The use of energy in accordance with sustainable development goals
ensures that natural balances are not disturbed at the production / consumption
stages. Alternative clean energy approaches such as green economy, ecological
footprint are increasingly foreground in energy politics. Diversification of
energy resources and less harm to the environment should be aimed. For this
reason, investments in wind, solar and hydro-energy resources should be
supported. Otherwise, at this rate in the future nature will be completely
exhausted, and become ‘natural’ out. In this context, this study examines the
new 'ecological' energy politics that enable the depletion of nature to be
avoided. The study is based on the method of scanning related literature and
strategy text with resources.

Keywords

Nature, Resource, Energy, Policy and energy policy

References

• Agrifood (2016). Retrieved from https://agrifood.uludag.edu.tr
• Baris, K., & Kucukali, S. (2012). Availability of renewable energy sources in Turkey: Current situation, potential, government policies and the EU perspective. Energy Policy, 42, 377–391.
• Bayram, H. (2005). Türkiye’de hava kirliliği sorunu: Nedenleri, alınan önlemler ve mevcut durum. Toraks Dergisi, 6(2), 159-165.
• Biresselioglu, M. E., Yelkenci, T., Ozyorulmaz, E., & Yumurtaci, I. Ö. (2017). Interpreting Turkish industry’s perception on energy security: A national survey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67, 1208-1224.
• Doğanay, H. (1994). Türkiye beşeri ve ekonomik coğrafyası. Ankara: Gazi Büro Kitapevi.
• EIE (2017). Retrieved from http://www.eie.gov.tr/yenilenebilir/YEKDEM.aspx.
• Energy6 (2017). Retrieved from https://energy6.net
• Enerjiatlasi (2017). Retrieved from http://www.enerjiatlasi.com/ruzgar/.
• Ercisli, S. (2004). A short review of the fruit germplasm resources of Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 51(4), 419-435.
• Gazetevatan (2017). Retrieved from http://www.gazetevatan.com/turkiye-nin-gucu-50-mw-arttiriliyor-989728-ekonomi/
• Geni (2017). Retrieved from http://www.geni.org/globalenergy/library/national_energy_grid/turkey/EnergyOverviewofTurkey.shtml
• Greenpartnerships (2017). Retrieved from http://www.greenpartnerships.eu
• Guardia, J. R., & Evans, N. J. (2008). Factors influencing the ethnic identity development of Latino fraternity members at a Hispanic serving institution. Journal of College Student Development, 49(3), 163-181.
• Hydroworld (2017). Retrieved from http://www.hydroworld.com/articles/print/volume-22/issue-5/features/reaching-for-turkey-s-hydropower-summit.html.
• IRENA (2017). Retrieved from http://www.irena.org/home/index.aspx?PriMenuID=12&mnu=Pri
• MFA (2017). Retrieved from http://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkeys-energy-strategy.en.mfa
• Pamir, A. N. (2003). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de enerji, Türkiye’nin enerji kaynakları ve enerji politikaları. Metalürji Dergisi, 17(134), 1-40. Retrieved from http://metalurji.org.tr/dergi/dergi134/d134_73100.pdf
• Philp, R. P. (1985). Biological markers in fossil fuel production. Mass Spectrometry Reviews, 4(1), 1-54.
• Savaş, H. (2012). Tüketim toplumu çevre performans indeksi ve Türkiye’nin çevre performansının indekse göre değerlendirilmesi. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 1(4), 132-148.
• Sözen, A., Arcaklioğlu, E., Özalp, M., & Kanit, E. G. (2004). Use of artificial neural networks for mapping of solar potential in Turkey. Applied Energy, 77(3), 273-286.
• Tamzok, N. (2003). Küresel politikalar ve Türkiye madencilik sektörü. Liberal Reformlar ve Devlet Sempozyumu (pp. 1-10), KİGEM, 18-19 Nisan, Ankara.
• Ulutaş, B. H. (2005). Determination of the appropriate energy policy for Turkey. Energy, 30(7), 1146-1161.
• Unfccc (2017). Retrieved from https://cop23.unfccc.int/
• Yesilaski (2017). Retrieved from http://www.yesilaski.com/ekolojik-ayak-izi.html
• Yıldız, C., & Şekkeli, M. (2016). Türkiye’de bir rüzgâr enerjisi santrali üretim karakteristiğinin pompaj depolamalı hidroelektrik santral ile değiştirilmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Yekarum e-Dergi, 3(2), 1-11.
• Yorkan, A. (2009). Avrupa Birliği’nin enerji politikası ve Türkiye’ye etkileri. Bilge Strateji, 1(1), 24-38.
• Zuvin, S. & Kirmizioglu, E. (2016). Solar energy incentives and licensing procedures in Turkey, Mondaq, 24 March. Retrieved from http://www.mondaq.com/turkey.