MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF THE OTTOMAN APPROACH TO ANIMALS ON ANIMAL DIVERSITY IN ANATOLIA

Mehmet Emin Yardımcı; Ümran Gümüş; Alper Koç

MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF THE OTTOMAN APPROACH TO ANIMALS ON ANIMAL DIVERSITY IN ANATOLIA

Abstract

A high variety of animals live in Anatolian lands. The number of animal species living in Anatolia is on average 1.5 multiple higher than those living in Europe. Anatolia is an important stopping point for intercontinental bird migrations. The main research question of this study is whether the institutions that shaped the approach of Ottomans to animals had an impact on the high level of animal species living in Anatolian lands. In line with the main aim of the study "the Crime Rate Model", " Intergenerational Transfer Model" and " Bargaining Model Under the lnfinite Horizon " are constructed. Additionally historical documents supporting the findings are presented. Transferring the awareness of protecting nature from generation to generation has a significant impact on shaping the Ottoman social mentality. The two most important factors that shaped the approach of Ottomans to animals were the Islâmîc belief , which ordered animals to be treated compassionately and traditions-customs. The Ottomans treated compassionately to not only domesticated animals but also wild animals and tried to protect them. The Ottoman legal system, foresees optimal punishment of those who harm animals. The findings show that the institutions that shaped the approach of Ottomans to animals had a significant impact on the high level of animal species living in Anatolian lands. However it is understood that the effects of the two World Wars that took place in the 20. century are also an important point that should be evaluated in this framework. In this structure and process, it is obvious that the World Wars caused the richness of Anatolia to decrease. This situation also affected the level of animal species living in Anatolian lands.

Keywords

References

Açıkel, A. (2023). Environmental and Sewage Network Cleaning in Tokat before Establishment of the Municipal Organization. International Journal of History Studies, 15(3): 401-418.
Akbulut, U. (2023). State and Society in the Face of Epidemics in the First Half of the 19th Century. Erzurum Technical University the Journal of Social Science Institute, 16: 22-40.
Akgündüz, A. & Öztürk, S. (2011). Ottoman History Mispetceptions and Truths. İstanbul: Kitapyurdu Yayıncılık
Aktürkoğlu, M. B. (2022). Cleaning Methods in the Ottoman Community of the XIX Century: Bibliople Arekel and Sadi B. Halid’s Stain Booklet Examples. The Journal of Social Sciences of Muş Alparslan University Anemon,10(2): 741-751.
Altan, B. (2019). The Cholera Outbreak at the End of 19th Century Cizre and Its Devastating Impacts. Mukaddime, 10(1): 37-52.
Altı, A. (2020). An Institution for the Ferocious and Wildlife Animals in the Ottoman State. Lionhome. Kare, 10: 120 – 139.
Altınbaş, M. (2021). Regulations and Practices on Environmental Law in the Ottoman State. International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 7(89): 4672-4679 . Arin, K. P., Devereux, K., Methorst, J. & Thum, M. (2025). Flooding the Vote: Heterogeneous Voting Responses to a Natural Disaster in Germany. European Journal of Political Economy, 89: 102694
Aydın, Y. A. (2024). Forest, Bandits and State: Some Measures Taken Against the Use of Forests as Illegal Activity Areas in the Ottoman Empire ( 16th – 18th Centuries). Turkish Journal of History, 84: 67-77.

Aydın, M. (2022). The Liability of the Animal Owner in the Classical Age of Ottoman Law. İnönü University Law Review, 13(2): 420-432.
Aydın, Y. & Akyol, A. (2025). A New Policy Tool for Conserving Biodiversity: Other Effective Area – Based Conservation Measures. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 26 (2): 182-189.
Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On The Measurement of Inequality, Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3), 244-263. Ayele, Y., Edjigu, H. & Oostendorp, R. H. (2024). The Differential lmpact of Legal Origins on Firm Productivity. Journal of Law and Economics, 67(3): 611-638.
Aykanat, M. (2024). Stray Dogs in Ottoman Law and Practice. Ombudsman Academic, (20), 47-80. Baygın, O. & Onur, T. (2021). Anatolian Psychedelia. Klaros Publisher.
Behnke H. & Claußen, G. (2001). Fasan und Rebhuhn-Biologie, Hege, Aufzucht, Kosmos Verlags-GmbH. Beránek, B. & Titl, V. (2024). The Cost of Favoritism in Public Procumerent. Journal of Law and Economics, 67(2): 445-477.
Biella, M., Henning, M.& Oswald, L. (2025). Investigating the Social Boundaries of Fairness by Modelling Ultimatom Game Responders’ Decisions with Multinomial Processing Tree Models. Games, 16(1): 1-21.
Bilirli, T. (2020). Timber Procurement from Viranşehir Sanjak for Ottoman Naval Ships. Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University. The Journal of Social Science Institute, 15(2): 421 – 437. Billot, A. & Çu, X. (2022). Deliberative Democracy and Utilitarianism. Social Choice and Welfare, 63(3-4): 603-617.
Bingöl, Ş. (2021). Modern Municipality Work in Muş During the Ottoman Period. The Journal of Social Sciences of Muş Alparslan University Anemon, 9(1): 111-127.
Bosco, D., Colombo, L. & Femminis, G. (2025). Conflict, Information and Regime – Change. European Journal of Political Economy, 89: 102681.
Breuning, H. J. V. B. (2010). Relation über seine sendung nach England im Jahr 1595. New York: Nabu Press.
Busbecq, O. G. (1881). The Life and Letters of Ogier Ghiselin de Busbecq. London: C. Kegan Poul & Co. Cairns, H. (1941). The Theory of Legal Science. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press
Castillo-Figueroa, D. (2025). The Effect of Forest Microenvironment on Litter Decomposition in the Andean Tropical Mountains. Journal Forest Research, 36,102.
Choi, J. H. & Han, K. (2023) Delegation of information acquisition, information asymmetry, and outside option, International Journal of Game Theory, Springer, Game Theory Society, 52(3), 833-860.
Cowan, T. A. (1948). Relation of Law to Experimental Social Science. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 96(4): 484-502.
Çetin, O. (2005). Ecofeminism: The Relationship Between Women Nature and Patriarchy. Socioeconomics, 1(1). 61-76.
Çiftçi, E. (2023). Camel, Tribe and the State: The Role of Tribal Camels in the Ottoman Mining and Army Logistic. Iğdır University. The Journal of Social Science Institute, 32: 148-163.
Çağman, E. (2017). Health Tourism in Ottoman Period: Sample of Kepekler Thermal Springs. The Journal of Yalova Social Sciences, 8(14): 87-104.
Dai, D. (2025). Can the Middle Class Benefit from more Conservative Redistribution?. European Journal of Political Economy, 89, 102700.
Donaldson, S & Kymlicka, W. (2013). Zoopolis:A Political Theory of Animal Rights. Oxford University Press.
Emek, F. (2025). Animal Culling as a Method of Agricultural Control from Ottoman Empire to Republic of Türkiye (1850-1938): Birds, Field Mice and Wild Boars. Studies in Ottoman Science, 26(1): 84-106.
Erler, M. Y. (2021). Birds of Prey on the Central Black Sea of Ottoman Realm. Journal of Ottoman Legacy Studies, 8(22): 469-493.
Fogle, B. (1992). The Dog’ s Mind: Understanding Your Dog’ s Behavior. Howell Books. Gkekas, A., Apostolidou, A., Vernadou, A. & Kehagias, A. (2025). Learning Optimal Strategies in a Duel Game. Games, 16(1): 1-16.
Gölcü, B. M. & Yerlikaya, N. (2016). Camels in the Ottoman Army and Regulations Related to the Ottoman Camel Corps During World War I. The Journal of International Social Research, 9(47): 269-278.
Gürler, A. M., Osmanoğlu, Ş. (2009), Historical Development of the Animal Protection Law in Turkey, Journal of Kafkas University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 15(3): 325-330.
Gündem, C. Y. (2024). Earliest Mule Remains from Early Bronze Age Central Anatolia. Animals, 14(10): 1397.
Hawkins, R., Ferreira, G. & Williams, J. (2019). The Development and Evaluation of ‘Farm Animal Welfare’: An Educational Computer Game for Children, Animals, 9(3), 91.
Inal, O. & Köse, Y. (2019). Seeds of Power: Explorations in Ottoman Environmental History. Cambridgeshire: The White Horse Press.
Johnson, L. R. (2017). Applying Game Theory to One Health: Modelling Veterinary Healthcare Delivery. International Animal Health Journal, 3(4): 16-21.
Kaplan, B. (2023). Kırklareli and Its Surroundings in Evliya Çelebi’s Seyahatname. Çukurova University The Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 32(2): 729-744.
Küçükuğurlu, M. (2023). Tophaneli Hacı Mehmet Ağa Foundation from the Ottoman Empire to the Turkish Republic. Erzurum Technical University the Journal of Social Science Institute, 16: 94-119. Klundt, M. (2024). Sozialstaat in Gefahr. Sozial Extra, 48(2): 118-122.
Koç, B. (2006). Various Conceptions on the “Hunting Prohibition and Its Limitations” as the Background of the Environment – Conscious in Juridical Texts after the Tanzimat. Journal of the Center for Ottoman Studies, 19(19): 271-281.
Kolay, E. (2023). The First Example of Ottoman Municipal Buildings: Sixth Department of the Municipality Building. Journal of Palmette, 3: 28-52.
Kurt, B. (2021). The Ottoman State between Urban Space and Environment: Preserving the Drinking Water of İstanbul. Belleten, 85(304): 933-966.
Lavelle, K., Fouad, K. & Illes, J. (2024). Stepwise Imperatives for Improving the Protection of Animals in Research and Education in Canada. MDPI Animals, 14: 1-9.
Li, C. (2024). Protecting Endangered Animal Species. MDPI Animals,14(18): 1-4.
Lokmacı, S. & Koçyiğit, M. (2024). Individual and Community Health in Ottoman Medicine: İnvestigation of Daily Life Practices. Academic Journal of History and Idea,11(5): 3506-3525.
Lubenau, R. (1995). Beschreibung der reisen des Reinhold Lubenau. Frankfurt: Johann Wolfgang Goethe University.
Mann, S. (2020). Easy Peasy Doggy Squeezy: Even more of Your Dog Training Dilemmas Solved. Blink Publishing.
Montagu, L. M. W. (1994). Turkish Embassy Letters. Chicago: Virago Press
Mehak, A., Mohsin, M., Shafqat, M.M. & Li, M.C. (2025). Prioritizing Risks in Pakistan’s Fisheries Sector: A Strategic Analysis Utilizing Fuzzy AHP and IPA Methodologies. Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 35(1): 106-119.
Metcalfe, D. (2008). The Protest Game: Animal Rights Protests and the Life Sciences lndustry. Negotiation Journal, 24(2): 125-143.
Mikhail, A. (2019). Under Osman’s Tree: The Ottoman Empire, Egypt and Environmental History. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press
Nasıroğlu, M. (2012). Mardin from the Eyes of Western Travelers in the New Age. Batman University Journal of Life Sciences, 1(1): 827-836.
Obuz, M. (2022). Personel Cleaning and Care in Payitaht Istanbul in the XVI. and XVII. Centuries from the Eyes of Western Travelers. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University the Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 55: 118-127.
Olivier, G. A. (2016). Travels in the Ottoman Empire, Egypt and Persia, Undertaken by Order of the Government of France, During the First Six Years of the Republic. Hungerford, Berkshire, England: Legare Street Press.
Olgun, Ç. (2025). The Effect of Ammonium Chloride Usage on the Recycling of Fiberboards in the Hydrothermal Hydrolysis Method. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 26(2): 175-181.
Onaran, B. T. (2022). Codification of Honor and Gender in the 1858 Ottoman Penal Code. Mediterranean Journal of Gender and Women’s Studies, 5(2): 209-239.
Ortaylı, İ. (2024). The Empire ‘s Longest Century. İstanbul: Kronik Kitap.
Ougolnitsky, G. & Korolev, A. (2025). Differential Games of Cournot Oligopoly with Consideration of Pollution, Network Structure and Continuous Updating. Games, 16(1): 1-22.
Özcoşar, İ. (2018). City and Administration: Administration in Ottoman Mardin before Tazminat. Mukaddime, 9(1): 1-21.
Öztürk, D. N. (2024). A Concise Treatise on Ottoman Culinary Culture. The Journal of Turkish Culture Study, 52: 381-408.
Özyaşar, Y. K. & Nacar, C. (2024). Anatolian Livestock Trade in the Late Ottoman Empire. Leiden: Leiden University Press.
Pelluchon, C. (2023). Manifest für die Tiere. C.H. Beck Publisher.
Polat, M. (2024). Uses of Camels in the Ottoman Empire According to Achive Documents (6th – 18th Centuries). The Journal of International Language, Literature, Culture, History, Art and Education Research, 17: 274-284.
Posner, R. A. (1998). Economic Analysis of Law. Waltham.: Aspen Law & Bussiness
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives. (BOA). (1262). Fund Code: A.MKT. Document Number: 49, 22.
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, (BOA). (1282). Fund Code: A.MKT.MHM. Document Number: 17, 347.
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, (BOA). (1311). Fund Code: A.MKT.MHM. Document Number: 15, 727.
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, (BOA). (1296). Fund Code: Y..PRK.HH.. Document Number: 6-7.
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, (BOA). (1286). Fund Code: HH.d… Document Number: 910, 22206.
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, (BOA). (1297). Fund Code: DA.MKT. Document Number: 95, 1330.
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, (BOA). (1309). Fund Code: DH.MKT. Document Number: 33, 1869.
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, (BOA). (1899). Fund Code: HR.SFR.3. Document Number: 50, 476.
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, (BOA). (1275). Fund Code: HR.MKT. Document Number: 60, 294.
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, (BOA). (1918). Fund Code: HR.TO. Document Number: 16, 548.
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, (BOA). (1332). Fund Code: A.DVN.MKL. Document Number: 60, 59.
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, (BOA). (1336). Fund Code: DH.UMVM. Document Number: 61, 75.
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, (BOA). (1309). Fund Code: Y.PRK.BŞK. Document Number: 122, 23.
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, (BOA). (1317). Fund Code: DH.MKT. Document Number: 17, 2234.
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, (BOA). (1900). Fund Code: MV. Document Number: 98-124.
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, (BOA). (1310). Fund Code: A.MKT.MHM. Document Number: 1, 727.
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, (BOA). (1322). Fund Code: DH.MKT. Document Number: 910, 2.
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives. (BOA). (1322/1904). Fund Code: İ..HUSHH.d… Document Number: 123-21. Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, (BOA). (1326). Fund Code: Y.PRK.SH. Document Number: 58, 7.
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, (BOA). (1329). Fund Code: DH. HMŞ. Document Number: 19, 74.
Prime Ministry Ottoman Archives, (BOA). (1859). Fund Code: HR.TO. Document Number: 48, 452.
Reichholf, J. H. (2022). Stadt, Land, Fuchs: Das Leben der Heimischen Säugetiere. Aufbau.
Rubinstein, A. (1982). Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model. Econometrica, 50(1), 97-109.
Sever, D. D. (2023). Captive Wild Animals as Visual Commodities in the Ottoman Empire: A Historical Environment. Middle Eastern Studies, 60(3): 368 – 384.
Siddiq, A. B. & Şanlı, S. (2020). Animals and Pastoral Groups in the Mountainous Ömerli District of Southeast Anatolia. Anthrozoös A Multidisciplinary Journal of the lnteractions between People and Other Animals, 33(2): 153-173.
Skarbek, D. (2024). The Political Economy of Criminal Governance. Public Choice, 200: 1-24.
Sucu, M. B. (2024). New Institutional Economics. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, 9(3), 1011- 1048.
Tamgörgü, A. B. (2020). Garbage as a Problem in Nineteenth Century Ottoman İstanbul. (Unpublished Master Thesis) Ege University Social Sciences Institute.
Tamtam, H. K. E. (2022). A Semantic Overview of the Toponymy of Nusaybin. Mukaddime, 13(1): 170-191.
Thévenot, J. – D. (2018). Voyages de Mr. Thévenot en Europe, Asie et Afrique. Manchester: Wentworth Press Publisher
Topuzlu, C. (2002). My 80 Years of Memories in the Periods of Independence, Constitutional Monarchy and Republic. İstanbul: Topuzlu Publisher.
Tuzcuoğlu, R. (2018). Environment and Urbanism in the Ottoman Empire. İstanbul: Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment.
Türkmen, Ö. S. (2024). The Relationship between Waqf and the Environment in Amasya During the Ottoman Period. Amasya University The Journal of Social Sciences, 9(15): 58-91.
Vadas, A. & Baráth, Z. (2024). Impacts of Pre – Modern War on Forests: The Case of the Hungarian – Ottoman Military Frontier (ca.1521-1690). Trees, Forests and People, 15: 1-8.
Walsh, R. (2021). Constantinople and the Scenery of the Seven Churches of Asia Minor First and Second Series. Caroline: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.
Weir, S. A., McDevitt, L., Andrews, C.P. & Kessler, S. E. (2025). The Creation of a Systematic Framework to Assess Dog Laws and Their Relationship to Societal Changes in the United Kingdom. MDPI Animals, 15(5): 1-29.
Wratislaw, B. W. (2022). Adventures of Baron Wenceslas Wratislaw. Hungerford, Berkshire: Legare Street Press.
Yardımcı, M. E., Gümüş, Ü. & Yasa, B. D. (2023). The Evaluation of the Sustainability Level of the Tax Farming System in the Framework of a Repeated Game Theoretical Model. KMU Journal Social and Economic Research, 25(45): 727-741.
Yasa, B. D., Gümüş, Ü.& Yardımcı, M. E. (2025). Evaluation of Development Strategy by Foreign Aid in Poor Countries. Journal of Öneri, 20(64),379-410.
Yerasimos, M. (2018). 500 Years of Ottoman Cuisine. İstanbul: Boyut Publishing.
Yeşil, M. (2016). Historical Development of the Changes in Approaches to Nature Conservation in Turkey and in the World. Turkish Journal of Agriculture – Food Science and Technology, 4(10): 867-876.
Yörük, D. (2016). Foundations and Associations for the Development of Environmental Understanding of Turkish Society from Ottoman Empire to the Present Day. Journal Of Studıes In Turkology, 40: 361- 372.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Microeconomic Theory

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Mehmet Emin Yardımcı ^*
0000-0002-2896-8342
Türkiye

Ümran Gümüş
0000-0001-7538-6970
Türkiye

Alper Koç
0000-0002-0824-7054
Türkiye

Early Pub Date

October 17, 2025

Publication Date

October 21, 2025

Submission Date

May 13, 2025

Acceptance Date

September 25, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 9 Number: 2

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA83RB58BM

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Yardımcı, M. E., Gümüş, Ü., & Koç, A. (2025). MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF THE OTTOMAN APPROACH TO ANIMALS ON ANIMAL DIVERSITY IN ANATOLIA. Journal of Research in Economics, 9(2), 140-171. https://izlik.org/JA83RB58BM

AMA

1.Yardımcı ME, Gümüş Ü, Koç A. MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF THE OTTOMAN APPROACH TO ANIMALS ON ANIMAL DIVERSITY IN ANATOLIA. JORE. 2025;9(2):140-171. https://izlik.org/JA83RB58BM

Chicago

Yardımcı, Mehmet Emin, Ümran Gümüş, and Alper Koç. 2025. “MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF THE OTTOMAN APPROACH TO ANIMALS ON ANIMAL DIVERSITY IN ANATOLIA”. Journal of Research in Economics 9 (2): 140-71. https://izlik.org/JA83RB58BM.

EndNote

Yardımcı ME, Gümüş Ü, Koç A (October 1, 2025) MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF THE OTTOMAN APPROACH TO ANIMALS ON ANIMAL DIVERSITY IN ANATOLIA. Journal of Research in Economics 9 2 140–171.

IEEE

[1]M. E. Yardımcı, Ü. Gümüş, and A. Koç, “MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF THE OTTOMAN APPROACH TO ANIMALS ON ANIMAL DIVERSITY IN ANATOLIA”, JORE, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 140–171, Oct. 2025, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA83RB58BM

ISNAD

Yardımcı, Mehmet Emin - Gümüş, Ümran - Koç, Alper. “MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF THE OTTOMAN APPROACH TO ANIMALS ON ANIMAL DIVERSITY IN ANATOLIA”. Journal of Research in Economics 9/2 (October 1, 2025): 140-171. https://izlik.org/JA83RB58BM.

JAMA

1.Yardımcı ME, Gümüş Ü, Koç A. MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF THE OTTOMAN APPROACH TO ANIMALS ON ANIMAL DIVERSITY IN ANATOLIA. JORE. 2025;9:140–171.

MLA

Yardımcı, Mehmet Emin, et al. “MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF THE OTTOMAN APPROACH TO ANIMALS ON ANIMAL DIVERSITY IN ANATOLIA”. Journal of Research in Economics, vol. 9, no. 2, Oct. 2025, pp. 140-71, https://izlik.org/JA83RB58BM.

Vancouver

1.Mehmet Emin Yardımcı, Ümran Gümüş, Alper Koç. MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF THE OTTOMAN APPROACH TO ANIMALS ON ANIMAL DIVERSITY IN ANATOLIA. JORE [Internet]. 2025 Oct. 1;9(2):140-71. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA83RB58BM