THE DYNAMIC EFFECTS OF GEOPOLITICAL RISK SHOCKS ON GOLD, EQUITY, AND BANKING MARKETS UNDER GLOBAL VOLATILITY: EVIDENCE FROM TÜRKIYE USING LOCAL PROJECTIONS
Abstract
This study examines how geopolitical risk (GPR) shocks propagate across Turkish financial markets within a Local Projection (LP) framework using daily data from January 2016 to January 2026. Given Türkiye’s position at the intersection of Europe, Asia, and the Middle East, understanding how safe-haven and risk-sensitive markets respond to geopolitical disturbances is critical for assessing financial stability. The analysis addresses the limited availability of high frequency evidence on this transmission mechanism and contributes by jointly evaluating returns in the gold, equity, and banking sectors within a unified empirical setting. GPR shocks are proxied by rolling-standardised daily changes in the news-based Geopolitical Risk Index developed by Caldara and Iacoviello (2022). By estimating horizon-specific impulse responses, the LP approach captures differences in the timing, speed, and persistence of market adjustments. The results reveal a clear temporal ordering: gold exhibits an immediate but short-lived response reflecting safe-haven behaviour; equity markets display a delayed negative reaction indicative of gradual risk repricing; and banking-sector returns show weaker and statistically imprecise responses. Robustness checks support the qualitative stability of these findings. Overall, the analysis provides high-frequency evidence directly relevant to systemic risk monitoring and the design of forward-looking macroprudential policies in geopolitically exposed economies. In this sense, the analysis provides high-frequency evidence that is directly relevant for systemic risk monitoring and the design of macroprudential policies in geopolitically exposed emerging economies.
Keywords
References
- Acharya, V. V., Pedersen, L. H., Philippon, T., and Richardson, M. (2017).Measuring systemic risk. Review of Financial Studies, 30(1), 2–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhw088
- Anginer, D., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., and Zhu, M. (2014). How does competition affect bank systemic risk? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 23(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2013.11.001
- Antonakakis, N., and Kizys, R. (2015). Dynamic spillovers between commodity and currency markets.International Review of Financial Analysis, 41, 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2015.01.016
- Antonakakis, N., Gupta, R., Kollias, C., and Papadamou, S. (2017). Geopolitical risks and the oil-stock nexusover 1899–2016. Finance Research Letters, 23, 165–173.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.07.017
- Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., and Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. Quarterly Journal ofEconomics, 131(4), 1593–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024
- Baur, D. G., and Lucey, B. M. (2010). Is gold a hedge or a safe haven? An analysis of stocks, bonds and gold.Financial Review, 45(2), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2010.00244.x
- Baur, D. G., and McDermott, T. K. (2010). Is gold a safe haven? International evidence. Journal of Banking &Finance, 34(8), 1886–1898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.12.008 Beckmann, J., Berger, T., and Czudaj, R. (2015). Does gold act as a hedge or a safe haven for stocks? A smooth transition approach. Economic Modelling, 48, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.044
- Bekaert, G., Hoerova, M., and Lo Duca, M. (2013). Risk, uncertainty, and monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 60(7), 771–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2013.06.003
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Applied Macroeconometrics, Econometrics (Other)
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Yaşam Demir
*
0000-0001-9482-1456
Türkiye
Publication Date
October 20, 2026
Submission Date
February 8, 2026
Acceptance Date
June 20, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 10 Number: 2