THE UNSPENT RESERVE: STRUCTURAL CHANGE POTENTIAL, REALLOCATION, AND REGIONAL PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH IN EUROPE
Abstract
Structural change raises aggregate labour productivity when workers move from branches in which they are less productive to branches in which they are more productive. How much of that gain remains available to a region at a given moment has never been measured directly. This paper defines and computes the reallocation reserve: the proportional productivity gain a region would obtain by adopting the employment composition of the European frontier while holding its own branch productivity levels fixed. Using Eurostat regional accounts for 231 NUTS 2 regions in 26 countries over 2000–2022, we show that the reserve is large, highly unequal and only partly spent. Its unweighted mean falls from 35.4 to 19.0 per cent, but the median region ends the period with a reserve of 10.4 per cent, and the median ratio of realised reallocation to the reserve available in 2000 is 0.18. The reserve measured in one period predicts realised reallocation in the next, with a coefficient of 0.049 (standard error 0.008) on five-year windows conditional on country by window fixed effects, and it survives an out-of-sample test on the final window. A corollary follows for convergence: within countries, reallocation is the only component of productivity growth that converges, and once the reserve is controlled for, initial income carries no further information about it. Reserve estimates computed on a four-branch classification are roughly a third of those computed on ten branches, so coarse sectoral data systematically hide the potential they are used to measure.
Keywords
References
- Abramovitz, M. (1986). Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. Journal of Economic History, 46(2), 385–406.
- Barca, F., McCann, P. & Rodríguez-Pose, A., (2012). The case for regional development intervention: place- based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152.
- Barro, R. J. & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223–251.
- Baumol, W. J. (1967). Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: the anatomy of urban crisis. American Economic Review, 57(3), 415–426.
- Becker, S. O., Egger, P. H. & von Ehrlich, M. (2010). Going NUTS: the effect of EU Structural Funds on regional performance. Journal of Public Economics, 94(9–10), 578–590.
- Beugelsdijk, S., Klasing, M. J. & Milionis, P. (2018). Regional economic development in Europe: the role of total factor productivity. Regional Studies, 52(4), 461–476.
- Boldrin, M. & Canova, F. (2001). Inequality and convergence in Europe’s regions: reconsidering European regional policies. Economic Policy, 16(32), 206–253.
- Campos, N. F., Coricelli, F. & Moretti, L. (2019). Institutional integration and economic growth in Europe. Journal of Monetary Economics, 103 88–104.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Microeconomic Theory
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Aras Yolusever
*
0000-0001-9810-2571
Türkiye
Publication Date
October 20, 2026
Submission Date
August 27, 2026
Acceptance Date
September 18, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 10 Number: 2