Use of uterine artery Doppler velocimetry values to predict pregnancy in intrauterine insemination cycles in couples with unexplained infertility

Year 2022, , 49 - 52, 01.01.2022

İbrahim Kale , Merve Dizdar

https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.1036208

Abstract

Background/Aim: It is known that pregnancy success in IUI cycles performed in couples with unexplained infertility is below 20% even under the best conditions. Predicting the success in IUI cycles and directing patients to appropriate assisted reproductive treatment is essential for the time and budget. In this context, we aimed to investigate the use of uterine artery Doppler velocimetry values to predict pregnancy in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles in couples with unexplained infertility.
Methods: In this prospective cohort study, couples with unexplained infertility were randomly assigned to two groups: clomiphene citrate (CC) and gonadotropin. The CC group used 50-150 mg CC daily between the 5th and 9th days of the menstrual period, while the gonadotropin group used 37.5-75 IU of recFSH daily from the 3rd day of the menstrual period until the dominant follicle developed. Ovulation was triggered by recHcg when at least one dominant follicle of 17 mm or larger was detected. Intrauterine insemination was performed 36 hours after the trigger. Uterine artery flow pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI)and the systolic-diastolic ratio (S/D) were measured in all patients by Doppler ultrasound on the 3rd day of menstruation and trigger day. Uterine artery Doppler values of the group that achieved pregnancy and those who could not conceive were compared as the main outcome of the study.
Results: The study was designed over 143 IUI cycles, 89 cycles in the gonadotropin group and 54 cycles in the CC group. In 143 IUI cycles, 24 (16%) pregnancies were obtained, seven (12%) in the CC group and 17 (12%) in the gonadotropin group. In both CC and gonadotropin cycles, mean age, BMI, duration of infertility, hormone levels on the third day of menstruation, endometrial thickness on 3rd day of menstruation and on the trigger day, dominant follicle number and mean follicle diameter were similar in the pregnant and non-pregnant groups (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in uterine artery Doppler values (RI, PI and S/D) measured neither on the 3rd day of the cycle nor on the trigger day between pregnant and non-pregnant groups in patients receiving CC or gonadotropin (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Considering the hormonal changes in stimulated cycles or other factors that may have an impact on endometrial blood flow and endometrial receptivity, we think that only uterine artery Doppler velocity measurement values are not effective in predicting pregnancy success in CC or gonadotropin-induced IUI cycles.

Keywords

Infertility, Uterine artery, Insemination, Pregnancy

References

• 1. Wang R, Danhof NA, Tjon-Kon-Fat RI, Eijkemans MJ, Bossuyt PM, Mochtar MH, et al. Interventions for unexplained infertility: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012692.pub2.
• 2. Ray A, Shah A, Gudi A, Homburg R. Unexplained infertility: an update and review of practice. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24:591–602.
• 3. El-Mazny A, Abou-Salem N, ElShenoufy H. Doppler study of uterine hemodynamics in women with unexplained infertility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;171:84–7.
• 4. Uysal S, Ozun Ozbay EP, Ekinci T, Aksut H, Karasu S, Isik AZ, et al. Endometrial spiral artery Doppler parameters in unexplained infertility patients: is endometrial perfusion an important factor in the etiopathogenesis? J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2012;13:169–71.
• 5. Kupesic S, Kurjak A. Uterine and ovarian perfusion during the periovulatory period assessed by transvaginal color Doppler. Fertil Steril. 1993;60:439–43.
• 6. Hsieh Y-Y, Chang FC-C, Tsai H-D. Doppler evaluation of the uterine and spiral arteries from different sampling sites and phases of the menstrual cycle during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: Uterine and spiral artery flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16:192–6.
• 7. Wakeman S, Benny P. Is it possible to predict a fertile cycle? Uteroovarian blood flow parameters in conception versus nonconception cycles. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2726–31.
• 8. Nakai A, Yokota A, Koshino T, Araki T. Assessment of Endometrial Perfusion with Doppler Ultrasound in Spontaneous and Stimulated Menstrual Cycles. J Nippon Med Sch. 2002;69:328–32.
• 9. Guzel AI, Erkılınc S, Ozer I, Tokmak A, Kurt Sahin A, Ugur M. Are Uterine and Ovarian Artery Doppler Velocimetry Values Good Pregnancy Predictors in Clomiphene Citrate Cycles? Int J Fertil Steril. 2015;9. doi:10.22074/ijfs.2015.4207.
• 10. Kim A, Han JE, Yoon TK, Lyu SW, Seok HH, Won HJ. Relationship between endometrial and subendometrial blood flow measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound and pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:747–52.
• 11. Ivanovski M, Damcevski N, Radevska B, Doicev G. Assessment of uterine artery and arcuate artery blood flow by transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration as predictors of pregnancy in an in vitro fertilization program. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2012;51:55–60.
• 12. Adibi A, Khadem M, Mardanian F, Hovsepian S. Uterine and arcuate arteries blood flow for predicting of ongoing pregnancy in in vitro fertilization. J Res Med Sci. 2015;20:879.
• 13. Yalti S, Gürbüz B, Ficicioglu C, Canova H. Doppler evaluation of the uterine, intraovarian, stromal and spiral arteries on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;23:402–6.
• 14. Ng EHY, Chan CCW, Tang OS, Yeung WSB, Ho PC. Comparison of endometrial and subendometrial blood flow measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound between stimulated and natural cycles in the same patients. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2385–90.
• 15. Ng EHY, Chan CCW, Tang OS, Yeung WSB, Ho PC. Relationship between uterine blood flow and endometrial and subendometrial blood flows during stimulated and natural cycles. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:721–7.