Research Article

Clinical and functional outcomes of pediatric elbow dislocations: Level 1 tertiary trauma center experience

Volume: 6 Number: 2 February 1, 2022
EN

Clinical and functional outcomes of pediatric elbow dislocations: Level 1 tertiary trauma center experience

Abstract

Background/Aim: Traumatic elbow dislocations have been reported as uncommon in pediatric population. Because of low frequency, there are not many studies on the subject in the literature. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the radiological and functional results of pediatric patients treated for elbow dislocations in a level-1 tertiary trauma center and to compare the results of simple and fractured dislocations. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of a single center experience diagnosed with pediatric elbow dislocations between 2015 and 2019. The cases were evaluated by dividing them into two groups as simple dislocations and fracture dislocations. Demographic features, injury mechanism, treatment, complications and Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) were evaluated. Results: Fifty-seven patients, (46 male/ 11 female), were included in the study, with a mean age of 11.1 (3-15) years. Mean follow up time was 27.2 (12-51) months. While 30 patients had fracture dislocations, 27 patients had simple dislocations. Of 30 patients with fracture dislocations, 19 were operated. Nonunion in the medial epicondyle in five patients, AVN (avascular necrosis) in radial head in two patients, heterotrophic ossification in one triceps, and recurrent dislocation in one patient were detected. According to MEPS, 42 (73%) of 57 patients were excellent, 12 (21%) good, one (2%) moderate, and two (4%) poor. According to MEPS, functional results of simple dislocations were found to be better than those of fracture-dislocations, and this result was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Elbow dislocations in children can be treated with good results if they are accurately diagnosed and if concentric stable reduction of the elbow as well as stable osteosynthesis of displaced fractures can be achieved. Simple dislocations are easier to manage and functional results are better, whereas the treatment of fractured dislocations is more complex and complications are more common in follow-up.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Wilkins KE. Fractures and dislocations of the elbow region. In: Rockwood CW, King RE, editor. Lipponcott-Raven1996. p. 653–887.
  2. 2. Sinikumpu JJ, Lautamo A, Pokka T, Serlo W. Complications and radiographic outcome of children's both-bone diaphyseal forearm fractures after invasive and non-invasive treatment. Injury. 2013;44(4):431-6.
  3. 3. Von Laer L. Pediatric fractures and dislocations. Pediatric fractures and dislocations. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme; 1st edition; 2004. p. 528.
  4. 4. Lieber J, Zundel SM, Luithle T, Fuchs J, Kirschner HJ. Acute traumatic posterior elbow dislocation in children. Journal of pediatric orthopedics Part B. 2012;21(5):474-81.
  5. 5. Rasool MN. Dislocations of the elbow in children. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume. 2004;86(7):1050-8.
  6. 6. Kirkos JM, Beslikas TA, Papavasiliou VA. Posteromedial dislocation of the elbow with lateral condyle fracture in children. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2003(408):232-6.
  7. 7. Murphy RF, Vuillermin C, Naqvi M, Miller PE, Bae DS, Shore BJ. Early Outcomes of Pediatric Elbow Dislocation-Risk Factors Associated With Morbidity. Journal of pediatric orthopedics. 2017;37(7):440-6.
  8. 8. Lawrence JT, Patel NM, Macknin J, Flynn JM, Cameron D, Wolfgruber HC, et al. Return to competitive sports after medial epicondyle fractures in adolescent athletes: results of operative and nonoperative treatment. The American journal of sports medicine. 2013;41(5):1152-7.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Orthopaedics

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

February 1, 2022

Submission Date

December 27, 2021

Acceptance Date

January 31, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 6 Number: 2

APA
Agar, A., Şahin, A., Gülabi, D., & Ertürk, C. (2022). Clinical and functional outcomes of pediatric elbow dislocations: Level 1 tertiary trauma center experience. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, 6(2), 84-89. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.1049265
AMA
1.Agar A, Şahin A, Gülabi D, Ertürk C. Clinical and functional outcomes of pediatric elbow dislocations: Level 1 tertiary trauma center experience. J Surg Med. 2022;6(2):84-89. doi:10.28982/josam.1049265
Chicago
Agar, Anıl, Adem Şahin, Deniz Gülabi, and Cemil Ertürk. 2022. “Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Pediatric Elbow Dislocations: Level 1 Tertiary Trauma Center Experience”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 6 (2): 84-89. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.1049265.
EndNote
Agar A, Şahin A, Gülabi D, Ertürk C (February 1, 2022) Clinical and functional outcomes of pediatric elbow dislocations: Level 1 tertiary trauma center experience. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 6 2 84–89.
IEEE
[1]A. Agar, A. Şahin, D. Gülabi, and C. Ertürk, “Clinical and functional outcomes of pediatric elbow dislocations: Level 1 tertiary trauma center experience”, J Surg Med, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 84–89, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.28982/josam.1049265.
ISNAD
Agar, Anıl - Şahin, Adem - Gülabi, Deniz - Ertürk, Cemil. “Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Pediatric Elbow Dislocations: Level 1 Tertiary Trauma Center Experience”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 6/2 (February 1, 2022): 84-89. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.1049265.
JAMA
1.Agar A, Şahin A, Gülabi D, Ertürk C. Clinical and functional outcomes of pediatric elbow dislocations: Level 1 tertiary trauma center experience. J Surg Med. 2022;6:84–89.
MLA
Agar, Anıl, et al. “Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Pediatric Elbow Dislocations: Level 1 Tertiary Trauma Center Experience”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, vol. 6, no. 2, Feb. 2022, pp. 84-89, doi:10.28982/josam.1049265.
Vancouver
1.Anıl Agar, Adem Şahin, Deniz Gülabi, Cemil Ertürk. Clinical and functional outcomes of pediatric elbow dislocations: Level 1 tertiary trauma center experience. J Surg Med. 2022 Feb. 1;6(2):84-9. doi:10.28982/josam.1049265