Research Article

General surgery service with limited feasibility in a rural hospital; Retrospective cohort study

Volume: 2 Number: 3 September 1, 2018
TR EN

General surgery service with limited feasibility in a rural hospital; Retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Aim: Many residents living in rural areas have access to health services more difficult than those living in urban areas. Although 20% of the US population lives in rural areas, only 9% of physicians work in these areas, and in particular general surgeons appear to be inadequate in small rural towns. This study was planned in order to determine the applications made from the general surgery in the district state hospital.
Methods: The study was carried out at the Bozkır State Hospital with 25 beds located approximately 150 km away from the center of Konya. In 2009, patient files were reviewed for general surgery polyclinic. Elective and urgent (major and minor) operations were recorded. The results are examined.
Results: During the study period, 4312 patients were seen in the outpatient clinic. The total number of working days in 2009 is 224 and the average number of patients per day is 22. During the study period, 35 major operations were performed. Twelve appendectomies, 15 inguinal hernias, six pilonidal sinus, one goiter and one intestinal resection in a case with strangulated inguinal hernia were performed.
Conclusion: The experience we have in our hospital may be related to the social structure and needs of our region. A rural surgeon, like third-line hospital services, may need experienced teams and adequate infrastructure to confront patients and meet their needs.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Lehmann U, Dieleman M, Martineau T. Staffing remote rural areas in middle- and low-income countries: a literature review of attraction and retention. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:19.
  2. 2. Dolea C, Stormont L, Braichet J. Evaluated strategies to increase attraction and retention of health workers in remote and rural areas. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(5):379-85.
  3. 3. Chankova S, Muchiri S, Kombe G. Health workforce attrition in the public sector in Kenya: a look at the reasons. Hum Resour Health. 2009;7:58.
  4. 4. Appiagyei A, Kiriinya RN, Gross JM, Wambua DN, Oywer EO, Kamenju AK, et al. Informing the scale-up of Kenya’s nursing workforce: a mixed methods study of factors affecting pre-service training capacity and production. Hum Resour Health. 2014;12(47):1-10.
  5. 5. World Health Organization. Increasing access to health workers in remote and rural areas through improved retention: Global Policy Recommendations. 2010 Accessed April 22 2015
  6. 6. Serneels P, Montalvo JG, Pettersson G, Lievens T, Butera JD, Kidanu A. Who wants to work in a rural health post? The role of intrinsic motivation, rural background and faith-based institutions in Ethiopia and Rwanda. Bull World Health Organ. 2010 May;88(5):342-9.
  7. 7. Binagwaho A, Kyamanywa P, Farmer PE, Nuthulaganti T, Umubyeyi B, Nyemazi JP et al. The Human Resources for Health Program in Rwanda – A New Partnership. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2013;369(21):2054-9.
  8. 8. Buchan J. Reviewing the benefits of health workforce stability. Human Resources for Health. 2010;8:29.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Surgery

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Publication Date

September 1, 2018

Submission Date

May 11, 2018

Acceptance Date

June 15, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 2 Number: 3

APA
Başak, F. (2018). General surgery service with limited feasibility in a rural hospital; Retrospective cohort study. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, 2(3), 236-238. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.422797
AMA
1.Başak F. General surgery service with limited feasibility in a rural hospital; Retrospective cohort study. J Surg Med. 2018;2(3):236-238. doi:10.28982/josam.422797
Chicago
Başak, Fatih. 2018. “General Surgery Service With Limited Feasibility in a Rural Hospital; Retrospective Cohort Study”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 2 (3): 236-38. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.422797.
EndNote
Başak F (September 1, 2018) General surgery service with limited feasibility in a rural hospital; Retrospective cohort study. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 2 3 236–238.
IEEE
[1]F. Başak, “General surgery service with limited feasibility in a rural hospital; Retrospective cohort study”, J Surg Med, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 236–238, Sept. 2018, doi: 10.28982/josam.422797.
ISNAD
Başak, Fatih. “General Surgery Service With Limited Feasibility in a Rural Hospital; Retrospective Cohort Study”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 2/3 (September 1, 2018): 236-238. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.422797.
JAMA
1.Başak F. General surgery service with limited feasibility in a rural hospital; Retrospective cohort study. J Surg Med. 2018;2:236–238.
MLA
Başak, Fatih. “General Surgery Service With Limited Feasibility in a Rural Hospital; Retrospective Cohort Study”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, vol. 2, no. 3, Sept. 2018, pp. 236-8, doi:10.28982/josam.422797.
Vancouver
1.Fatih Başak. General surgery service with limited feasibility in a rural hospital; Retrospective cohort study. J Surg Med. 2018 Sep. 1;2(3):236-8. doi:10.28982/josam.422797

Cited By