Research Article

Proximal femur fracture, analysis of epidemiology, complications, and mortality: A cohort with 380 patients

Volume: 5 Number: 1 January 1, 2021
EN

Proximal femur fracture, analysis of epidemiology, complications, and mortality: A cohort with 380 patients

Abstract

Background/Aim: Among all orthopedic injuries, hip fractures continue to have high morbidity and mortality. While the epidemiological features of proximal femoral fractures (PFF) have often been defined, there are studies which examine the relationship between the complications of the types of PFF and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of PFF types and investigate the relationship between complications of subtypes and mortality. Methods: This study included 380 patients aged >40 years who underwent surgery for a PFF. The fractures were classified according to localization as intertrochanteric femur fracture (ITFF), femoral neck fracture (FNF) and subtrochanteric fracture (STF). Patient demographic data (age, gender, comorbidities) were recorded, and modified Charlson comorbidity scores were calculated. Major surgical complications (infection, dislocation, implant failure) were defined as those requiring additional surgery, and minor surgical complications (cellulitis, wound site problems, pressure sores, deep vein thrombosis) as those not requiring surgery. Mortality rates were examined at 1, 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The fracture subtypes were compared with respect to surgical complications (major and minor), non-surgical complications and mortality rates. Mortality risk factors were determined according to final mortality status. Results: The patients included 235 females and 136 males (F/M=2/1) with a mean age of 78.5 (12.1) years. Three hundred and thirty (86.5%) patients were aged >65 years and 50 (13.5%) were aged <65 years. The fractures were classified as 225 (60%) ITFF, 120 (32%) FNF, and 26 (7%) STF. Surgical complications and complications not related to surgery were seen in 35 (9.2%) and 25 (6%) patients, respectively. Mortality occurred within one month in 17 (4.6%) patients, in three months in 32 (8.6%) and within the first year in 97 (26%). No significant difference was found between fracture types with respect to mortality in 1, 3, and 12 months (P=0.51, P=0.641, P=0.2 respectively). The mortality rates of ITFF and FNF were highly similar (1, 3, 12-month mortality: P=0.943, P=0.939, P=0.946 respectively). In the comparison between the surviving and non-surviving groups, age, Charlson comorbidity index, prolonged stay in intensive care, and non-surgical complications were significantly increased in the non-surviving group (P<0.001, P<0.001, P=0.03, P=0.005 respectively). Conclusion: ITFF is common among PFF. While there was no relationship between fracture types in PFF, complication and mortality, a correlation was found between mortality and age, Charlson comorbidity score, prolonged stay in intensive care, and non-surgical complications.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Singer BR, McLauchlan GJ, Robinson CM, Christie J. Epidemiology of fractures in 15,000 adults: the influence of age and gender. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(2):243-8.
  2. 2. Baron JA, Karagas M, Barrett J, Kniffin W, Malenka D, Mayor M, et al. Basic epidemiology of fractures of the upper and lower limb Measuring Recovery After a Hip Fracture 301 among Americans over 65 years of age. Epidemiology. 1996;7:612–8.
  3. 3. Dennison E, Mohamed MA, Cooper C. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2006;32(4):617-29.
  4. 4. Canale ST(ed): Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics, 10 th ed.St Louis, Mosby, 2003. Hip Fracture. David G. Lavelle Chapter 52, p 2873-2938
  5. 5. Sanz-Reig J, Salvador Marín J, Pérez Alba JM, Ferrández Martínez J, Orozco Beltrán D, Martínez López JF. Risk factors for in-hospital mortality following hip fracture. Factores de riesgo de mortalidad intrahospitalaria en la fractura proximal de fémur. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2017;61(4):209–15. doi:10.1016/j.recot.2017.03.003
  6. 6. Arican, M, Yildiz KI, Karaduman ZO, Bulut M, Özkan S. DLT (TM) çivisi uygulanan intertrokanterik femur kiriklarinin tedavi sonuçlari/Treatment outcomes of intertrochanteric femur fractures treated with DLT (TM) nail. Dicle Tip Dergisi. 2015;42(4):495.
  7. 7. Giessauf C, Glehr M, Bernhardt GA, Seibert FJ, Gruber K, Sadoghi P, et al. Quality of life after pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with a gamma nail: a single center study of 62 patients. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2012;13(1):214.
  8. 8. Guzon-Illescas O, Perez Fernandez E, Crespí Villarias N, et al. Mortality after osteoporotic hip fracture: incidence, trends, and associated factors. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):203. Published 2019 Jul 4. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1226-6

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Orthopaedics

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 1, 2021

Submission Date

August 28, 2020

Acceptance Date

February 18, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 5 Number: 1

APA
Yaradılmış, Y. U., Okkaoğlu, M. C., Ateş, A., Kılıç, A., Demirkale, İ., & Altay, M. (2021). Proximal femur fracture, analysis of epidemiology, complications, and mortality: A cohort with 380 patients. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, 5(1), 75-79. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.787253
AMA
1.Yaradılmış YU, Okkaoğlu MC, Ateş A, Kılıç A, Demirkale İ, Altay M. Proximal femur fracture, analysis of epidemiology, complications, and mortality: A cohort with 380 patients. J Surg Med. 2021;5(1):75-79. doi:10.28982/josam.787253
Chicago
Yaradılmış, Yüksel Uğur, Mustafa Caner Okkaoğlu, Ahmet Ateş, Alparslan Kılıç, İsmail Demirkale, and Murat Altay. 2021. “Proximal Femur Fracture, Analysis of Epidemiology, Complications, and Mortality: A Cohort With 380 Patients”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 5 (1): 75-79. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.787253.
EndNote
Yaradılmış YU, Okkaoğlu MC, Ateş A, Kılıç A, Demirkale İ, Altay M (January 1, 2021) Proximal femur fracture, analysis of epidemiology, complications, and mortality: A cohort with 380 patients. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 5 1 75–79.
IEEE
[1]Y. U. Yaradılmış, M. C. Okkaoğlu, A. Ateş, A. Kılıç, İ. Demirkale, and M. Altay, “Proximal femur fracture, analysis of epidemiology, complications, and mortality: A cohort with 380 patients”, J Surg Med, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 75–79, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.28982/josam.787253.
ISNAD
Yaradılmış, Yüksel Uğur - Okkaoğlu, Mustafa Caner - Ateş, Ahmet - Kılıç, Alparslan - Demirkale, İsmail - Altay, Murat. “Proximal Femur Fracture, Analysis of Epidemiology, Complications, and Mortality: A Cohort With 380 Patients”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 5/1 (January 1, 2021): 75-79. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.787253.
JAMA
1.Yaradılmış YU, Okkaoğlu MC, Ateş A, Kılıç A, Demirkale İ, Altay M. Proximal femur fracture, analysis of epidemiology, complications, and mortality: A cohort with 380 patients. J Surg Med. 2021;5:75–79.
MLA
Yaradılmış, Yüksel Uğur, et al. “Proximal Femur Fracture, Analysis of Epidemiology, Complications, and Mortality: A Cohort With 380 Patients”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, vol. 5, no. 1, Jan. 2021, pp. 75-79, doi:10.28982/josam.787253.
Vancouver
1.Yüksel Uğur Yaradılmış, Mustafa Caner Okkaoğlu, Ahmet Ateş, Alparslan Kılıç, İsmail Demirkale, Murat Altay. Proximal femur fracture, analysis of epidemiology, complications, and mortality: A cohort with 380 patients. J Surg Med. 2021 Jan. 1;5(1):75-9. doi:10.28982/josam.787253