Research Article

Which anti-TNF is most effective for my patient? Which one should I choose?

Volume: 5 Number: 9 September 1, 2021
EN

Which anti-TNF is most effective for my patient? Which one should I choose?

Abstract

Background/Aim: Multicenter controlled studies were conducted on the effect of anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) agents in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and varying effectiveness rates were reported. These agents have different advantages over each other. We aimed to compare the disease activation parameters in patients with RA at the beginning and the 52nd week of therapy in patients who were followed up in our center and started on anti-TNF (etanercept, adalimumab, and golimumab), and examine the effects of the drugs that are used by comparing them with each other. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 187 patients with RA who were started on anti-TNF therapy because the disease activity could not be controlled by the concomitant use of at least three different conventional Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic drugs, and whose adequate response to anti-TNF were observed at the 12th-week follow-up. RA disease activity was measured using the 28-joint Disease Activity Score incorporating erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS-28 ESR) and the patients were evaluated by a Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). For each drug group, disease activation and laboratory parameters were compared before treatment initiation and at 52 weeks of treatment. These values were then compared between the drug groups. Results: The mean age of 187 patients included in the study was 52.70 (10.17) years, 119 (63.6%) were female and 68 (36.4%) were male. Of the patients, 63 (33.7%) were using adalimumab, 62 (33.2%) were using etanercept and 62 (33.2%) were using golimumab. In all patients, there was a significant improvement in all parameters except mean corpuscular hemoglobin, gamma-glutamyl transferase, and creatinine. There were significant changes in hemoglobin, leukocyte and platelet count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C reactive protein, neutrophil count, serum albumin, DAS-28 ESR, and HAQ levels in all three groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: There were no differences in efficacy between adalimumab, etanercept and golimumab therapies, which were planned considering the comorbidities and drug preferences of the patients. In addition to controlled studies, real-life data to be reported by rheumatology centers will help us obtain more accurate information about the therapy results of anti-TNF agents.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

YOK

Project Number

YOK

Thanks

YOK

References

  1. 1. Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Carmona L. The global burden of rheumatoid arthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. 2014;73:1316-22. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204627. Epub 2014 Feb 18. PubMed PMID: 24550173.
  2. 2. Kitas GD, Gabriel SE. Cardiovascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis: state of the art and future perspectives. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2011;70:8-14. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.142133. Epub 2010 Nov 24. PubMed PMID:21109513.
  3. 3. Sokka T, Kautiainen H, Pincus T, Verstappen SM, Aggarwal A, Alten R, et al. Work disability remains a major problem in rheumatoid arthritis in the 2000s: data from 32 countries in the QUEST-RA study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12:R42. doi: 10.1186/ar2951. Epub 2010 Mar 12. PubMed PMID: 202260118 PubMed Central PMCID: 2888189.
  4. 4. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO, 3rd, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2010;69:1580-8. doi: 10.1002/art.27584.
  5. 5. Smolen JS, Aletaha D. Rheumatoid arthritis therapy reappraisal: strategies, opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11:276-89. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.8. PubMed PMID:25687177.
  6. 6. Nam JL, Ramiro S, Gaujoux-Viala C, Takase K, Leon-Garcia M, Emery P, et al. Efficacy of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a systematic literature review informing the 2013 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2014;73:516-28. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204577. Epub 2014 Jan 7. PubMed PMID: 24399231.
  7. 7. Gaujoux-Viala C, Nam J, Ramiro S, Landewé R, Buch MH, Smolen JS, et al. Efficacy of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, glucocorticoids and tofacitinib: a systematic literature review informing the 2013 update of the EULAR recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2014;73:510-5. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204588. Epub 2014 Jan 6. PubMed PMID: 24395555 PubMed Central PMCID:PMC3932966.
  8. 8. Ramiro S, Gaujoux-Viala C, Nam JL, Smolen JS, Buch M, Gossec L, et al. Safety of synthetic and biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2013 update of the EULAR recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2014;73:529-35. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204575. Epub 2014 Jan 8. PubMed PMID: 24401994.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Rheumatology and Arthritis

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 1, 2021

Submission Date

August 17, 2021

Acceptance Date

September 29, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 5 Number: 9

APA
Pamukcu, M., & Aydogan Baykara, R. (2021). Which anti-TNF is most effective for my patient? Which one should I choose? Journal of Surgery and Medicine, 5(9), 941-945. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.984025
AMA
1.Pamukcu M, Aydogan Baykara R. Which anti-TNF is most effective for my patient? Which one should I choose? J Surg Med. 2021;5(9):941-945. doi:10.28982/josam.984025
Chicago
Pamukcu, Melih, and Rabia Aydogan Baykara. 2021. “Which Anti-TNF Is Most Effective for My Patient? Which One Should I Choose?”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 5 (9): 941-45. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.984025.
EndNote
Pamukcu M, Aydogan Baykara R (September 1, 2021) Which anti-TNF is most effective for my patient? Which one should I choose? Journal of Surgery and Medicine 5 9 941–945.
IEEE
[1]M. Pamukcu and R. Aydogan Baykara, “Which anti-TNF is most effective for my patient? Which one should I choose?”, J Surg Med, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 941–945, Sept. 2021, doi: 10.28982/josam.984025.
ISNAD
Pamukcu, Melih - Aydogan Baykara, Rabia. “Which Anti-TNF Is Most Effective for My Patient? Which One Should I Choose?”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 5/9 (September 1, 2021): 941-945. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.984025.
JAMA
1.Pamukcu M, Aydogan Baykara R. Which anti-TNF is most effective for my patient? Which one should I choose? J Surg Med. 2021;5:941–945.
MLA
Pamukcu, Melih, and Rabia Aydogan Baykara. “Which Anti-TNF Is Most Effective for My Patient? Which One Should I Choose?”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, vol. 5, no. 9, Sept. 2021, pp. 941-5, doi:10.28982/josam.984025.
Vancouver
1.Melih Pamukcu, Rabia Aydogan Baykara. Which anti-TNF is most effective for my patient? Which one should I choose? J Surg Med. 2021 Sep. 1;5(9):941-5. doi:10.28982/josam.984025