Transtorasik akciğer biyopsisi hakkındaki YouTube videolarının kalite ve doğruluğunun değerlendirilmesi

Year 2020, Volume: 4 Issue: 8, 627 - 630, 01.08.2020

Okan Gürkan , Canan Gunduz

https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.778941

Abstract

Amaç: YouTube, hastalar için önemli bir tıbbi bilgi kaynağıdır. Ancak içerik kalitesine bağlı olarak yanıltıcı bilgiler de verebilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, perkütan transtorasik akciğer biyopsisi ile ilgili YouTube videolarının kalitesini değerlendirmektir.
Yöntemler: YouTube’da ‘Lung Biopsy’, ‘CT-Guided Lung Biopsy’ ‘US-Guided Lung Biopsy’ ve ‘percutaneous Transthoracic Biopsy’ terimleri ile arama yapıldı. İlintili İngilizce videolar iki kişi tarafından incelendi. Video karakteristikleri, yüklendiği kaynak ve içerik kalitesi değerlendirildi. Global kalite skorunu değerlendirmek için korelasyon analizi yapıldı.
Bulgular: On beş video (%47) profesyonel sağlık çalışanları, 9 video (%28) firmalar, 6 video (%19) kişisel hesaplar ve 2 (%6) video ise akademik kurum tarafından yüklenmişti. Videoların ortanca (IQR) kalite skoru 2 (aralık 1-5), ortanca uzunluğu ise 235 (46-751) saniye olarak hesaplandı. Videoların kalitesi, yüklendiği kaynağa göre değişiklik göstermekte olup, akademik kurumlar tarafından yüklenen videolar en yüksek kaliteye sahipti. Komplikasyonlar gibi önemli biyopsi prosedürü komponentleri, çoğu videoda değerlendirilmemişti.
Sonuç: Perkütan transtorasik akciğer biyopsisi (PTLB) ile ilgili YouTube videolarında bazı önemli noktalar göz ardı edildiğinden dolayı, düşük bir ortanca içerik kalite puanına sahip oldukları gözlendi. Bu nedenle, YouTube videoları yanıltıcı bir hasta bilgisi kaynağı olabilir. Akademik kurumlar ve sağlık uzmanları, bilgilendirici tıbbi bilgi arayan hastalar için doğru multimedya içeriği oluşturmalıdır.

Keywords

YouTube, Sosyal medya, Biyopsi, Hasta eğitimi

Assessment of quality and accuracy of YouTube videos on percutaneous transthoracic biopsy

Abstract

Aim: YouTube is an essential source of medical information for patients, but may also be misleading, depending on the kind of content quality. The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of YouTube videos on percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy.
Methods: A search on YouTube was performed with the terms ‘Lung Biopsy,’ ‘CT-Guided Lung Biopsy,’ ‘US-Guided Lung Biopsy,’ and ‘Percutaneous Transthoracic Biopsy.’ Relevant English videos were examined and scored by two reviewers. Video characteristics, uploaded sources, and content quality were assessed using different indices. Correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the possible correlation for global quality score.
Results: Fifteen videos (47%) were uploaded by a healthcare professional, nine videos (28%) by a product company, six videos (19%) by an individual user, and 2 (6%) by an academic institution. The videos had a median (IQR) quality score of 2 (range 1-5), and a median (IQR) length of 235 (46-751) seconds. The quality of the videos varied, depending on the uploaded sources as well as whether they were uploaded by academic institutions, which had the highest quality. Some important components regarding the biopsy procedure, such as complications, were not evaluated in most videos.
Conclusion: YouTube videos on percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy (PTLB) had a low median content quality score, while some important points were grossly overlooked. Thus, YouTube videos may be a misleading source of patient information. Academic institutions and healthcare professionals should be creating accurate multimedia content for patients seeking informative medical information.

Keywords

YouTube, Social Media, Biopsy, Patient Education

References

• 1. Alexa. 2019. The top 500 sites on the web. [Online] Available at: https://www.alexa.com/topsites. [Accessed 7 May 2019]
• 2. YouTube. 2019. YouTube for Press. [Online] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/intl/en-GB/yt/about/press/. [Accessed 7 May 2019]
• 3. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
• 4. Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. International variation in lung cancer mortality rates and trends among women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23:1025-36. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1220
• 5. Charig M, Clelland C, Gleeson F, R Miller, H Moss et al. Guidelines for radiologically guided lung biopsy. Thorax. 2003;58:920-36. doi: 10.1136/thorax.58.11.920
• 6. iProspect Search Engine User Behaviour Study. [Accessed January 26, 2012.] Available from: http://district4.extension.ifas.ufl.edu/Tech/TechPubs/WhitePaper_ 2006_SearchEngineUserBehavior.pdf.
• 7. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: An instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53:105-11. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.2.105
• 8. Lehmann S, Frank N. An Overview of Percutaneous CT-Guided Lung Biopsies. J Radiol Nurs 2018; 37: 2-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jradnu.2017.12.002
• 9. American T. Acr – Sir – Spr Practice Parameter on Informed Consent for Image-Guided Procedures. 2016;1076:1-8.
• 10. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wakeup call? J Rheumatol. 2012;39:899-903. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.111114
• 11. Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube. Spine. 2018;43:E1334-E1339. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002691
• 12. Sechrest RC. The internet and the physician-patient relationship. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2566-71. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1440-3
• 13. Swischuk JL, Castaneda F, Patel JC, Jitendra C. Patel, Ruizong Li, et al. Percutaneous Transthoracic Needle Biopsy of the Lung: Review of 612 Lesions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998;9:347-52. doi: 10.1016/S1051-0443(98)70279-9.
• 14. Kazerooni EA, Lim FT, Mikhail A, Martinez FJ. Risk of pneumothorax in CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of the lung. Radiology. 1996;198:371-5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596834
• 15. Jackson R, Schneider A, Baum N. Social media networking: YouTube and search engine optimization. J Med Pract Manage. 2011;26:254-7.