Investigation of Social Studies Teachers’ Design and Production-Oriented Teaching Activities in In-class/Out-of-School Learning Environments

Year 2023, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 325 - 345, 25.10.2023

Feyza Kabalay , Abdullah Gökdemir

Abstract

In the current study, it is aimed to determine to what extent social studies teachers direct their students to design and production in in-class/out-of-school learning environments. The study employed the survey model, one of the quantitative research methods. The participants of the study are social studies teachers working in two provinces in the Southern Aegean in the 2020-2021 school year. In the study, the “Examination of Social Studies Teachers’ Design and Production-Oriented Teaching Activities in In-Class/Out-of-School Learning Environments” questionnaire, developed by the researchers, was used to reveal to what extent social studies teachers support their students with design and production-oriented teaching activities. As a result of the study, it was revealed that teachers supported their students in the dimensions of interest and professional awareness at a “high” level. However, their support was found to be at a “medium” level in the activity dimension, engaging in activities dimension and design and production-oriented teaching dimension. Moreover, the extent to which the teachers include design and production-oriented teaching activities for students in in-class/out-of-class learning environments was found to not vary significantly depending on the variables of age, gender, education level and professional experience. Various and numerous design workshops can be opened to support students’ design and production activities and to offer design and production-oriented teaching environments to teachers.

Keywords

Social studies, design and production-oriented teaching, in-class/out-of-school learning environments

References

• Baker, F. W., & Moukhliss, S. (2020). Concretising design thinking: A content analysis of systematic and extended literature reviews on design thinking and human-centred design. Review of Education, 8(1), 305–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3186
• Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
• Carroll, M., Goldman, S., Britos, L., Koh, J., Royalty, A., & Hornstein, M. (2010). Destination, ımagination and the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01632.x
• Chen, C. (2013). Immersive learning: A creative pedagogy. The International Journal of Pedagogy and Curriculum, 19(2), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7963/cgp/v19i02/48899
• Chiu, T. K. F., Chai, C. S., Williams, P. J., & Lin, T.-J. (2021). Teacher professional development on self-determination theory–based design thinking in STEM education. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 153–165.
• Girgin, D. (2020). 21. yüzyılın öğrenme deneyimi: Öğretmenlerin tasarım odaklı düşünme eğitimine ilişkin görüşleri. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(226), 53-91.
• Goldman, S., & Zielezinski, M.B. (2016). Teaching with Design Thinking: Developing New Vision and Approaches to Twenty-First Century Learning. In: Annetta, L., Minogue, J. (eds) Connecting Science and Engineering Education Practices in Meaningful Ways. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol 44. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16399-4_10
• Henriksen, D., Gretter, S., & Richardson, C. (2018). Design thinking and the practicing teacher: Addressing problems of practice in teacher education. Teaching Education, 31(2), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2018.1531841 https://deneyap.org/tr/
• Indigo (2018). Tasarım odaklı düşünme nedir? https://indigodergisi.com/2018/08/tasarim-odakli-dusunme-design-thinking
• Karasar, N. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (26th ed.). Nobel.
• Kröper, M., Fay, D., Lindberg, T., & Meinel, C. (2011). Interrelations between motivation, creativity and emotions in design thinking processes – an empirical study based on regulatory focus theory. In Taura, T., & Nagai, Y. (Eds.), Design creativity (pp.97-104). Springer.
• Malkoç, S., & Kaya, E. (2015). Sosyal bilgiler öğretiminde sınıf dışı okul ortamlarının kullanılma durumları. İlköğretim Online, 14(3), 1079-1095.
• MEB (2005). İlköğretim sosyal bilgiler dersi 4-5. sınıflar öğretim programı. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınevi.
• MEB (2018). Sosyal bilgiler öğretim programı. http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=354
• Persico, D., Pozzi, F., & Goodyear, P. (2018). Teachers as designers of TEL interventions. British journal of educational technology, 49(6), 975-980. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12706
• Razzouk, R. & Shute, V. (2012). Design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429
• Retna, K. S. (2015). Thinking about “design thinking”: A study of teacher experiences. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2015.1005049
• Saranlı, A. G., & Deniz, K. Z. (2018). Okul çapında zenginleştirme modeline dayalı zenginleştirme uygulamalarının ilköğretim öğrencileri üzerindeki etkilerinin incelenmesi. TÜBİTAK SOBAG Projesi (Proje No: 115K814).
• Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education, 17(3), 8-19.
• Sözer, E. (1998). Sosyal bilgiler programının amaçları, ilkeleri ve temel özellikleri. Sosyal bilgiler öğretimi içinde Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı/SBB (2019). On birinci kalkınma planı. https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/On_Birinci_Kalkinma_Plani-2019-2023.pdf
• Üztemur, S., Dinç, E., & Acun, İ. (2017). Müze ve tarihi mekân uygulamalarının 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin müze ve tarihi mekân algılarına etkisi: Bir eylem araştırması. Gelecek Vizyonlar Dergisi, 1(1), 9-20.
• Vanada, D. I. (2014). Practically creative: The role of design thinking as an improved paradigm for 21st century art education. Techne Series A, 21(2), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.21606/learnxdesign.2013.071
• Warr, M., & Mishra, P. (2021). Integrating the discourse on teachers and design: An analysis of ten years of scholarship. Teaching and Teacher Education, 99, 103274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103274