Gender in School Administration: Problems of Women Administrators

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 81 - 113, 31.05.2025

Münir Şahin

https://doi.org/10.53047/josse.1700205

Abstract

Gender reflects the biological characteristics that people are born with. Society attributes different characteristics and abilities to different genders. This study aims to determine the problems of female school principals who serve as school principals. A qualitative research was conducted in the study using a positive case study design. 12 out of a total of 26 female school principals serving in the 2024-2025 academic year in Tokat province were determined using the purposeful easy-to-access sampling method. Data were collected using a semi-structured interview form developed by the researcher. In the study consisting of gender-based problems of female administrators, difficulties and advantages of being a female administrator and suggestions, it was determined that women mostly experience problems related to communication and long working hours. It was observed that most women are stuck between home and management, have problems due to long working hours and male teachers avoiding communication. The general expectation that the manager or leader will be a man and the traditional perspective on women may prevent women from becoming managers. More encouragement of women to take part in school administration, financial support of administrators, rewarding successful administrators, making arrangements regarding working hours are important suggestions for women to become school administrators.

Keywords

Gender, education, school administration, women leaders female administrators problems

Ethical Statement

It was conducted with the approval decision taken in the 21st session of Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University Social and Human Sciences Research Ethics Committee, dated 24.12.2024, number 01-51, ethical ssessment certificate number: 504270

References

• Acuner, Ş. (2019). Kadın Çalışanların Kariyer Geliştirme Sürecinde Karşılaştıkları Sorunlar. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, (23), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.456582
• Aydın, İ. (2009). Türk eğitim yönetiminde öncü kadınlar. Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
• Bagihole, B. (2012). A cross-national analysis of gender equality and the shift form collegiality to managerialism in higher education policy. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia, 28, 23-36.
• Baltacı, A. (2018). Nitel Araştırmalarda Örnekleme Yöntemleri ve Örnek Hacmi Sorunsalı Üzerine Kavramsal Bir İnceleme. BEÜ SBE Dergisi, 7(1), 231-274.
• Balyer, A. (2017). School principals’ views on administration work, their “frequent urnover” and its effects on their work. The Qualitative Report, 22(5), 1471–1487
• Barsh, J. & Cranston, S. (2011). How remarkable women lead: The breakthrough model for work and life. New York: Crown Business.
• Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. The Free Press
• Birgün (2019). MEB’de kadın yöneticilerin oranı yüzde 1,92: Erkek Eğitim Bakanlığı https://www.birgun.net/haber/mebde-kadin-yoneticilerin-orani-yuzde-1-92-erkekegitim-bakanligi-268876 19.01.2023
• Blackmore, J. (1989) Educational leadership: A feminist critique and reconstruction. In J. Smyth, (Ed) Critical perspectives on educational Leadership (pp. 93-129). Barcombe: Falmer Press.
• Brundage, M.R. (2016). Women’s ınherent and learned leadership characteristics: Navigation to success in educational leadership roles (Unpublished Disertation), Grand Canyon University.
• Burton, L. (1993). Management, “race” and gender: An unlikely alliance? British Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 275-290. Campbell, S. (2010). A comparative study of educational leadership behavıor by gender and race (Unpublished disertation) Faculty of the Graduate School of Saint Louis University
• Chin, J.L. (2011). Women and leadership: Transforming visions and current contexts. The Forum on Public Policy, 1-15.
• Christman, D. & McClellan, R. (2008). “Living on barbed wire”: Resilient women administrators in educational leadership programs, Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(1), 3-29.
• Çıkmaz, E. (2019). Problems that women managers encountered in public organizations: A qualitative study. Electronic Journal of Soscial Sciences, 18 (72), 1767-1775.
• Coleman, M. (2005). Gender and secondary school leadership. International Studies in Educational Administration, 33(2), 3-20.
• Cook, A. & Glass, C. (2013). Above the glass ceiling: When are women and racial/ethnic minorities promoted to CEO? Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1080-1089.
• Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., Ovadia, S. & Vanneman, R. (2001). The glass ceiling effect. Social Forces, 80(2), 655–81.
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Dana, J. & Bourisaw, D. (2006). Overlooked leaders. American School Board Journal, 193(6), 27-30.
• Diehl, A. B. (2014). Making meaning of barriers and adversity: Experiences of women leaders in higher education. Advancing Women in Leadership, 34, 54-63.
• Duncan, P. A. (2007). Women in positions of leadership and gender-specific emotional intelligence attributes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Order No. 3252973).
• Eagly, A. H. & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychology Review, 109(3), 573-598.
• Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J. & Johnson, B. T. (1992). Gender and leadership style among school principals: A meta-analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28 (1), 76 102.
• Eagly, A.H. & Carli, L.L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807-834.
• Enomoto, E. (2000). Probing educational management as gendered: An examination through model and metaphor. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 375-397.
• Eveline, J. (2004). Ivory basement leadership: Power and invisibility in the changing university. Crawley: University of Western Australian Press.
• Ezzedeen, S. R., Budworth, M. H. & Baker, S. D. (2015). The glass ceiling and executive careers: Still an issue for precareer women. Journal of Career Development. doi:10.1177/0894845314566943
• Fitzsimmons, T. W., Callan, V. J. & Paulsen, N. (2014). Gender disparity in the C- suite: Do male and female CEOs differ in how they reached the top? The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 245-266.
• Glesne, C. (2013). Nitel araştırmaya giriş, A. Ersoy ve P. Yalçınoğlu (Çev.). Anı Yayıncılık.
• Grogan, M. (2005). Echoing their ancestors, women lead school districts in the United States. International Studies in Educational Administration, 33(2), 21-30.
• Guillaume, C. & Pochic, S. (2009). What would you sacrifice? Access to top management and the work-life balance. Gender, Work and Organization, 16(1), 1-26.
• Gunbayani, I. (2005). Women and men teachers’ approaches to leadership styles. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 33(7), 685-698.
• Hallinger, P. (2011),"Leadership for learning: lessons from 40 years of empirical research", Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125 – 142.
• Haslett, B. J., Geis, F. L. & Carter, M. R. (1992). The organizational woman: Power and paradox. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
• Isaac, C. A., Kaatz, A. & Carnes, M. (2012). Deconstructing the glass ceiling. Sociology Mind, 2(1), 80-86.
• Kanter, R.M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books.
• Kaplan, A. E. (2022). Kadın Okul Yöneticilerinin Sorunlarınıinceleyen 2016-2021 Yılları Arasındaki araştırmaların meta Sentezi”, International Social Mentality and Researcher Thinkers Journal, 8 (66): 2309- 2323
• Kaptan, S. (1998). Bilimsel araştırma ve istatistik teknikleri. Tekışık Web Ofset Tesisleri.
• Kerr, B., Kerr, G. R. & Miller, W. (2014). Bureaucratic, leadership, and workforce representation among female administrators, Public Administration Quarterly, 38 principals, assistant principals, and classroom teacher in U.S. school districts, 2002 2008. (3), 371-404.
• Kezar, A. (2002). Expanding notions of leadership to capture pluralistic voices: Positionality theory in practice. Journal of College Student Development, 43(4), 558-578Lewis, D. (1998). How useful a concept is organizational culture? Strategic Change, 7, 261-76.
• Kirişçi, G. & Can, N. (2020). Eğitim ve Okul Yöneticilerinin Cam Tavan Sendromuna İlişkin Görüşleri, Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6 (2), 618-636.
• Köse, A. & Uzun, M. (2017). Okul Öncesi Eğitim Kurumlarında Kadın Yönetici Olmak: Sorunlar ve Eğilimler, Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(3), 1058-1083.
• Langdridge, D. (2007). Phenomenological Psychology: Theory, Research and Method. Harlow: Pearson.
• Malcahy, M. & Lineham, C. (2014). Females and precarious board positions: Further evidence of the glass cliff. British Journal of Management, 25, 425-438.
• Maume, D. J. (1999). Glass ceiling and glass escalators. Work and Occupations, 26(4), 483-509.
• McCollum, P. (2005). Review of literature on leadership – an excerpt from the new book, The Ohtli Encuentro –Women of Color Share Pathways to Leadership. Intercultural Development Research Association (IDRA, http://www.idra.org/newslttr/2005/Jun/Pam.htm 21.01.2023.
• MEB (2022). 2021-2022 Örgün eğitim istatistikleri açıklandı. https://www.meb.gov.tr/20212022orgunegitimistatistikleriaciklandi/haber/27552/tr#:~:textKad%C4%B1n%20%C3%B6%C4%9Fretmenler%0%C3%A7o%C4%9Funlukta,bin%20379'u%20kad%C4%B1nlardan%20olu%C5%9tu.19.01.2023
• Mokaba-Bernardo, D. (2016). An examination of women and educational leadership: A postmodern feminist analysis of the leadership styles of women superintendents (Unpublished Disertation), Office of Graducate Studies, University of Massachusetts.
• Nguyen, T. L. H. (2013). Barriers to and facilitators of female Deans’ career advancement in higher education: An exploratory study in Vietnam. Higher Education, 66, 13-138.
• Northouse, P. G. (2010). Leadership: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Washington DC: Sage.
• Olid, C. S. (2013). Models of professional career of the managerial women. Universitas Psychologica, 12(4), 1237-1254.
• Oplatka, I. (2002). Women principals and the concept of burnout: An alternative voice? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 5(3), 211-226.
• Özkan, H., Demir Özkan, H., Altınok, T. & Pısıl, Y. O. (2023). Kadın Yöneticilerin Gözünden Okul Yönetiminde Karşılaşılan Sorunlar, Journal of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences, 9(69), 3661-3666. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/JOSHAS.72537
• Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel Araştırma ve Değerlendirme Yöntemleri. (Çev. Edt. M. Bütün, S.B. Demir). Pegem Akademi.
• Sabharwal, M. (2015). From glass ceiling to glass cliff: Women in senior executive service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 399-426.
• Şahin, M. (2019). Authentic Leadership. Journal of Current Researches on Social Sciences 9(1), 39-60.
• Şahin, M. (2021). Opinions of university students on effects of distance learning in Turkey during the Covid-19 pandemic. The African Educational Research Journal, 9(2), 526-543.
• Şahin, M. (2022). The problems and opportunities of hybrid education for school management. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(4), 96-103.
• Şahin, M. (2023). The place and importance of family in education. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 52(240), 3195-3220.
• Şahin, M. (2024). İnsan hakları eğitiminin önemi. Eğitimin Renkleri: Farklı Disiplinler, Ortak Hedefler 1. 85-112.
• Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63-75.
• Smith, P., Caputi, P. & Crittenden, N. (2012). How are women’s glass ceiling beliefs related to career success? Career Development International, 17(5), 458-474.
• Smulyan, L. (2000). Feminist cases of nonfeminist subjects: Case studies of women principals. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (QSE), 13(6), 589-609.
• Taylor, P. (1994). Leadership in education. Emergency Librarian, 21(3), 9-17.
• Tınaz, P., (2006). Mobbing: İşyerinde Psikolojik Taciz. Çalışma ve Toplum, 3(10), 11-22.
• Topçu, F. (2021). Bağımsız Devlet Okullarında Çalışan Yöneticilerin Kadın Yöneticilere İlişkin Cam Tavan Algılarının İncelenmesi: Küçükçekmece Örneği (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü.
• Valentine, S. (1998). Self-esteem and men’s negative stereotypes of women who work. Psychological Reports, 83, 920-922.
• Vuksanovic, M. (2012). Is manager’s gender an important factor in selection to a position? Megatrend Review, 9(1), 253-264.
• Weyer, B. (2007). Twenty years later: Explaining the persistence of the glass ceiling for women leaders. Women in Management Review, 22(6), 482-496.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H., (2011). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (8.Baskı). Seçkin Yay.
• Yılmaz, S. (2016, Haziran). Okul yöneticileri ve öğretmenlerin toplumsal cinsiyetçiliğe ve kadın yöneticilerin liderlik becerilerine yönelik görüşleri (Doktora Tezi). Eskişehir Anadolu Üniversitesi.
• Yoder, J. D. (2001). Making leadership work more effectively for women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 815-828.
• YÖK (2021). Türk üniversitelerindeki kadın profesör sayısı Avrupa ortalamasının geride bıraktı. https://www.yok.gov.tr/Sayfalar/Haberler/2021/turk-universitelerindeki-kadinprofesor-orani-avrupaortalamasini-gecti.aspx