Removal of Arsenate in drinking water sources by combined coagulation process

Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 247 - 274, 28.02.2022

Kadir Özdemir

https://doi.org/10.18596/jotcsa.980203

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine arsenate (As(V)) removal from drinking water sources with combined coagulation processes using Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (SWCNTs) and Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes (MWCNTs). Ulutan Lake Water (ULW) in Zonguldak-Turkey, was used as drinking water source. Conventional coagulation experiments was conducted on using aluminum sulfate (Alum) and ferric chloride (FeCl3). Water samples were synthesized by spiking 300 µg/L As(V) into ULW samples and also all arsenic removal tests were performed with As(V). The maximum removal percentages of As(V) (97%) was observed with combined SWCNTs and FeCl3 in ULW. Similar to that of SWCNTs, the removal of As(V) (92%) during the coagulation processes occurred at MWCNT with the addition of FeCl3. Compared to SWCNTs, the removal percentage of As(V) was slightly lower when using only MWCNTs (76%). This result demonstrated that SWCNTs were generally more powerful than MWCNTs for removing the As(V). The presence of humic acid (HA) increased As(V) removal with related the solution pH. On the other hand, the changing of As(V) residual concentrations in ULW was observed as a function of pH and the removal of As(V) increases in the acidic pH levels whereas decreases alkaline pH levels. While As(V) removal efficiency was remained constant at acidic pH values, it decreased about 10% at pH 6, 7 and 8 as a result of the competitive adsorption between As(V) and HA. It was observed that the As(V) removal efficiency increased both low and high pH with monovalent electrolyte (NaCl) whereas di-valent ions (Ca+2 and Mg+2) improved As(V) removal only at pH 9 and 10 during the coagulation processes in ULW samples. The results of this study display that combined coagulation process is more effective than conventional coagulation alone for the As(V) removal.

Keywords

Arsenate removal, carbon nanotubes, water treatment, combined coagulation

Supporting Institution

Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey

Project Number

114Y030

Thanks

The author would like to thank the TUBITAK (Project No. 114Y030) for their financial support.

References

• 1. Mohan D, Pittman CU. Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents–a critical review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007;142:1–53.
• 2. Chen Z, Ngo HH, Guo W, Wang X. Analysis of Sidney’s water schemes. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2013;7:608–615.
• 3. Viraraghavan T, Subramanian KS, Aruldoss JA. Arsenic in drinking waterproblems and solutions. Water Sci. Technol. 1999;40:69-76.
• 4. Smedley PL, Kinniburgh DG. A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl. Geochem. 2002;17:517–568.
• 5. Choong TSY, Chuah TG, Robih Y, Koay FLG, Azni I. Arsenic toxicity, health hazards and removal techniques from water: an overview. Desalination. 2007;217:139–166.
• 6. Chen SL, Dzeng SR, Yang MH, Chiu KH, Shieh GM, Wai CM. Arsenic species in groundwaters of the blackfoot disease area, Taiwan. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1994;28:877.
• 7. Smith AH, Marshall G, Yuan Y. Increased mortality from lung cancer and bronchiectasis in young adults after exposure to arsenic in utero and in early childhood. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006;114:1293.
• 8. Hughes MF, Beck BD, Chen Y, Lewis AS, Thomas DJ. Arsenic exposure and toxicology: a historical perspective. Toxicol. Sci. 2011;123:305–332.
• 9. WHO. Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, Recommendations. 4th ed. Geneva; 2011. 564 p. ISBN: 978 92 4 154815 1
• 10. Sullivan C, Tyrer M, Cheeseman CR, Graham NJD. Disposal of water treatment wastes containing arsenic–a review. Sci. Total Environ. 2010;408:1770–1778.
• 11. Pal P, Ahammad SK, Pattanayak A, Bhattacharya P. Removal of arsenic from drinking water by chemical precipitation-a modelling and simulation study of the physical chemical processes. Water Environ. Res. 2007;79:357-366.
• 12. Anirudhan TS, Jalajamony S. Cellulose-based anion exchanger with tertiary amine functionality for the extraction of arsenic(V) from aqueous media. J. Environ. Manage. 2010;91(11):2201-2207.
• 13. Manna AK, Sen M, Martin AR, Pal P. Removal of arsenic from contaminated ground water by solar-driven membrane distillation. Environ. Pollut. 2010;158:805-811
• 14. Medina A, Gamero P, Robles JMA, Izquerdo M. Fly ash from a Mexican mineral coal. II. Source of W zeolite and its effectiveness in arsenic (V) adsorption. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010;181:91-104.
• 15. APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. Washington, 21st ed.DC: American Public Health Assoc. 2005.
• 16. Samadder SR, Sneh L. Removal of arsenic from water using nano adsorbents and challenges: A review. J.Environ.Manag. 2010;166:387-406.
• 17. Özdemir K. The use of carbon nanomaterials for removing natural organic matter in drinking water sources by a combined coagulation process. Nanomater. Nanotechnol. 2016;6:1-12.
• 18. Cathalifaud FG, Pallier V, Serpaud B, Bollinger JC. Effect of organic matter on arsenic removal during coagulation/flocculation treatment. J.Colloid Interface. Sci. 2010;342:26-32.
• 19. Duan J, Wang Y, Liu S, Li W, Leeuwen VJ, Mulcahy D. Removal of As(III) and As(V) by ferric salts coagulation–Implications of particle size and zeta potential of precipitates. Sep. Purif. Tech. 2014;135:64-71.
• 20. Balasubramanian N, Madhavan K, Arsenic Removal from industrial effluent through electrocoagulation. Chem. Eng. Tech. 2001;24(5):519-521.
• 21. Rao P, Mak MSH, Liu T, Lai KCK, Lo IMC. Effects of humic acid on arsenic(V) removal by zero-valent iron from groundwater with special references to corrosion products analyses. Chemosphere 2009;75:156-162.
• 22. Guan XH, Dong HR, Ma J, Jiang L. Removal of arsenic from water: effects of competing anions on As(III) removal in KMnO4–Fe(II) process. Water Res. 2009;43: 3891–3899.
• 23. Pallier V, Feuillade-Cathalifaud G, Serpaud B, Bollinger J-G. Effect of organic matter on arsenic removal during coagulation/flocculation treatment. J. Colloid Interface. Sci. 2010;342:26-32.
• 24. Qiao JL, Jiang Z, Sun B, Sun YK, Wang Q, Guan XH. Arsenate and arsenite removal by FeCl3: effects of pH, As/Fe ratio, initial As concentration and coexisting solutes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012;92:106–114.
• 25. Meng XG, Bang S, Korfiatis GP. Water Res. 2000;34:1255–1261.
• 26. Zhu H, Jia Y, Wua X, Wang H. Removal of arsenic from water by supported nano zero-valent iron on activated carbon. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009;172:1591-1596.
• 27. Kong S, Wang Y, Zhan H, Yuan S, Yu M, Liu M. Adsorption/oxidation of arsenic in groundwater by nanoscale Fe-Mn binary oxides loaded on zeolite. Water Environ. Res. 2014;86(2):147-155.