Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma için Kimya: Lesotho'daki Bazı Kimya Öğretmenlerinin Yeşil Kimya Kavramına İlişkin Algılarının Değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Küresel sürdürülebilirlik sorunları bağlamında, yeşil kimya, çevreye duyarlı bilim eğitimini teşvik etmek için kritik bir çerçeve sunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, Lesotho'daki lise kimya öğretmenlerinin yeşil kimya ve bunun Lesotho Genel Ortaöğretim Sertifikası (LGCSE) müfredatına entegrasyonu hakkındaki algılarını ve bunu öğretmeye hazır olma durumlarını araştırmaktadır. Matematik ve fen bilimleri öğretmenleri derneği aracılığıyla dağıtılan yarı nitel bir anket kullanılarak, 35 öğretmenden alınan yanıtlar, öğretmenlerin çoğunun (%78) yeşil kimyayla gayri resmi olarak karşılaştığını ve temel bir anlayışa sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur – bu anlayış öncelikle daha az tehlikeli kimyasal kullanımı (%57) ve kirlilikle ilgili fikirlerle (%20) ilişkilidir. Bununla birlikte, birçoğu aşina olduklarını iddia etmelerine rağmen, mevcut müfredat içinde yeşil kimya ilkelerini açıkça tanımlayamamıştır. Öğretmenlerin çoğunluğu (%77), sürdürülebilirlik sorunlarıyla ilgili olduğunu kabul ederek, yeşil kimyanın açıkça dahil edilmesini güçlü bir şekilde desteklemiştir. Ancak, %86'sı bunu öğretme konusunda kendine güven duyduğunu ifade ederken, aynı oranda yüksek bir oran da daha fazla eğitime ihtiyaç duyduğunu belirtmiştir. Bu bulgular, öğretmenlerin yeşil kimya anlayışının resmi olarak yapılandırılmış olmaktan ziyade örtük olduğunu göstermektedir. Çalışma, Lesotho'nun eğitim sistemini ülkenin onayladığı küresel sürdürülebilirlik hedefleriyle uyumlu hale getirmek için, etkili müfredat uygulamasını desteklemek amacıyla açık müfredat entegrasyonuna, hedefli öğretmen mesleki gelişimine ve paydaş işbirliğine duyulan ihtiyacı vurgulamaktadır.

Keywords

• kimya öğretmenleri
• program entegrasyonu
• yeşil kimya
• sürdürülebilir kalkınma
• algı
• Lesotho
• Lesotho

Supporting Institution

Lesotho Ulusal Üniversitesi, Commonwealth Chemistry ve Lesotho Kimya Derneği

Project Number

Not applicable

Ethical Statement

Araştırma, görüşme anketine ilişkin etik kurallara uygun olarak yürütülmüştür.

Thanks

Sözü edilen kurumlar, işbu vesileyle usulüne uygun olarak tanınmaktadır.

Chemistry for Sustainable Development: Assessing the Perception of Some High School Teachers in Lesotho of the Green Chemistry Concept

Abstract

In the context of global sustainability challenges, green chemistry offers a critical framework for promoting environmentally responsible science education. This study investigates the perceptions of high school chemistry teachers in Lesotho regarding green chemistry and its integration into the Lesotho General Certificate of Secondary Education (LGCSE) curriculum, as well as their readiness to teach it. Using a semi qualitative questionnaire distributed through the association of mathematics and science teachers, responses from 35 teachers revealed that most teachers (78%) encountered green chemistry informally and demonstrated basic understanding – primarily associated with less hazardous chemical use (57%) and pollution-related ideas (20%). However, many were unable to explicitly identify green chemistry principles within the existing curriculum, despite claiming familiarity with it. Teachers majority strongly supported explicit inclusion of green chemistry (77%), recognizing its relevance to sustainability issues. However, though 86% expressed confidence in teaching it, an equally high proportion expressed the need for further training. These findings suggest that teachers’ understanding of green chemistry is implicit rather than formally structured. The study highlights the need for explicit curriculum integration and targeted professional teacher development and stakeholder collaboration to support effective curriculum implementation, aligning Lesotho’s education with global sustainability goals that the country has ratified.

Keywords

• chemistry teachers
• curriculum integration
• green chemistry
• Lesotho
• Lesotho
• perception
• sustainable development.

Supporting Institution

National University of Lesotho, Commonwealth Chemistry and Chemical Society of Lesotho

Project Number

Not applicable

Ethical Statement

The research was carried out in observance of the ethics code for the interview questionnaire

Thanks

The aforementioned institutions are hereby duly acknowledged.

References

1. Anastas, P. T., & Warner, J. C. (1998). Green chemistry: Theory and practice. Oxford University Press.
2. Armstrong, L. B., Rivas, M. C., Zhou, Z., Irie, L. M., Kerstiens, G. A., Robak, M. A., Douskey, M. C., & Baranger, A. M. (2019). Developing a green chemistry focused general chemistry laboratory curriculum: What do students understand and value about green chemistry? Journal of Chemical Education, 96(11), 2410–2419. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00277
3. Bodner, B. (2016). Integrating positive psychology into the EFL classroom [Master’s thesis, University of Graz].
4. Bohloko, M., Makatjane, T. J., Mokuku, T., & George, M. J. (2019). Assessing the effectiveness of using YouTube videos in teaching the chemistry of Group I and VII elements in a high school in Lesotho. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 23(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2019.1593610
5. Bordens, K. S., & Abbott, B. B. (2011). Research design and methods: A process approach (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
7. Brophy, J. (1999). Toward a model of the value aspects of motivation in education: Developing appreciation for… Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3402_1
8. Chanshetti, U. (2014). Green chemistry: Environmentally benign chemistry. International Journal of Advanced Research in Chemical Science, 1(1), 110–115.

9. Chen, M., Jeronen, E., & Wang, A. (2020). What lies behind teaching and learning green chemistry to promote sustainability education? A literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 7879. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217876
10. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2005). Research Methods in Education (5th ed.). RoutledgeFalmer.
11. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Action research. In Research Methods in Education (pp. 440–456). Routledge.
12. Cooper, T. (2017). Curriculum renewal: Barriers to successful curriculum change and suggestions for improvement. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(11), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i11.2737
13. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
14. De Almeida, A. F., Moreira, R., & Rodrigues, T. (2019). Synthetic organic chemistry driven by artificial intelligence. Nature Reviews Chemistry, 3(10), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-019-0124-0
15. Dykema, J., Jones, N. R., Piché, T., & Stevenson, J. (2013). Surveying clinicians by web: Current issues in design and administration. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 36(3), 352–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278713496630
16. Etzkorn, F. A., & Ferguson, J. L. (2023). Integrating green chemistry into chemistry education. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 62(2), e202209768. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202209768
17. Fathi, V. K., Jamali, T. M., Zamanaimanesh, H., & Youzbashi, A. (2012). The obstacles to curriculum change in higher education: Viewpoints of faculty members of Shahid Beheshti University and Shahid Beheshti Medical University. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 11(7), 768–778. https://doi.org/10.22037/IJME.V11I7.59215
18. George, M. J. (2015). The status of food industry and associated socio-economic implications in Lesotho: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Science Policy & Governance, (Healthy Food Policy Issue).
19. George, M. J. (2016). Turning resource scarcity into an abundance of applied research opportunities in a financially strained university: The case of chemical sciences at the National University of Lesotho. Journal of Science Policy and Governance, 8(1), 1–10.
20. George, M. J. (2017). Assessing the level of laboratory resources for teaching and learning of chemistry at advanced level in Lesotho secondary schools. South African Journal of Chemistry, 70, 154–162. https://doi.org/10.17159/0379-4350/2017/v70a22
21. George, M. J., & Kolobe, M. (2014). Exploration of the potential of using a virtual laboratory for chemistry teaching at secondary school level in Lesotho. South African Journal of Chemistry, 67(1), 113–117. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC157769
22. Howes, L., & Lemonick, S. (2020). In these classrooms, chemistry is part of a larger whole. Chemical & Engineering News, 95(5).
23. Hurst, G. A. (2020). Systems thinking approaches for international green chemistry education. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 21, 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2020.02.004
24. Hutchison, J. E. (2019). Systems thinking and green chemistry: Powerful levers for curricular change and adoption. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(12), 2777–2783. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00334
25. Lönngren, J., & Svanström, M. (2016). Systems thinking for dealing with wicked sustainability problems: Beyond functionalist approaches. In New developments in engineering education for sustainable development (pp. 151–160). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32933-8_14
26. Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.62707/aishej.v9i3.335
27. Mahaffy, P. G., Matlin, S. A., Potgieter, M., Saha, B., Visa, A., Cornell, S., Ho, F. M., Talanquer, V., Wissinger, J. E., & Zuin, V. G. (2021). Systems thinking and sustainability: Converging on chemistry’s role in the 21st Century. Chemistry International, 43(4), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1515/ci-2021-0402
28. Mammino, L. (2019). Roles of systems thinking within green chemistry education: Reflections from identified challenges in a disadvantaged context. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(12), 2881–2887. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00302
29. Maruatona, T. (1994). Hegemony and the curriculum process: A critique of curriculum development and implementation in Botswana. Mosenodi, 2(2), 15–32. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/AJA1021559X_195
30. Merriam, S. B. (2002). Introduction to qualitative research. In S. B. Merriam (Ed.), Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis (pp. 1–17). Jossey-Bass.
31. Mohafa, L. G., Qhobela, M., & George, M. J. (2022). Evaluating the influence of interactive simulations on learners’ academic performance in stoichiometry. South African Journal of Chemistry, 76, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.17159/0379-4350/2022/v76a01
32. Murphy, R. (2012). Sustainability: A wicked problem. Sociologica, 6(2), 0. https://doi.org/10.2383/38274
33. Phakisi, M. E. (2008). Factors affecting the implementation of the new junior secondary science curriculum in Lesotho [Doctoral dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand].
34. Pouris, A., & Pouris, A. (2009). The state of science and technology in Africa (2000–2004): A scientometric assessment. Scientometrics, 79(2), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0417-z
35. Ramli, S., Rasul, M. S., & Affandi, H. M. (2018). Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i9/4682
36. Rebs, T., Brandenburg, M., & Seuring, S. (2019). System dynamics modeling for sustainable supply chain management: A literature review and systems thinking approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 1265–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.100
37. Reyes, K. M., Bruce, K., & Shetranjiwalla, S. (2022). Green chemistry, life cycle assessment, and systems thinking: An integrated comparative-complementary chemical decision-making approach. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(1), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00550
38. RSA (Republic of South Africa). (1994). South African Schools Act, No. 84 of 1994. Government Gazette.
39. Seotsanyana, M. E. (2018). The relevance of Lesotho secondary school curriculum to the needs of learners in the 21st Century. In M. Lekhetho (Ed.), Education in Lesotho: Prospects and challenges (pp. 81–95). Nova Science Publishers.
40. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2016). Kingdom of Lesotho sustainable development goals: Indicator baseline summary report. United Nations. https://www.undp.org/lesotho/publications/sdg-baseline-report
41. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2024, July 25). Basics of green chemistry. Retrieved July 26, 2024, from https://www.epa.gov/greenchemistry/basics-green-chemistry
42. Van Bommel, M., Boshuizen, H. P., & Kwakman, K. (2015). Appreciation of a constructivist curriculum for learning theoretical knowledge by social work students with different kinds and levels of learning motivation. International Journal of Educational Research, 71, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.04.002
43. Wang, M. Y., Li, X. Y., & He, L. N. (2018). Green chemistry education and activity in China. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 13, 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.07.001
44. Woolman, D. C. (2001). Educational reconstruction and post-colonial curriculum development: A comparative study of four African countries. International Education Journal, 2(5), 27–46.
45. Young, T. J. (2015). Questionnaires and surveys. In H. Zhu (Ed.), Research methods in intercultural communication: A practical guide (pp. 163–180). Wiley-Blackwell.
46. Zuin, V. G., Eilks, I., Elschami, M., & Kümmerer, K. (2021). Education in green chemistry and in sustainable chemistry: Perspectives towards sustainability. Green Chemistry, 23(4), 1594–1608. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0GC03313H