Some Thoughts on Ötükän

Öz

The Ötükän Mountain was Mecca of the Turks from 552 to 840. The essay has collected 22 Turkic and 84 Chinese records about the Ötükän Mountain, and mainly examined the geographical location the Ötükän. The Turkic records clearly indicated the Ötükän was the whole Khangai Mountains. The Chinese official records basically agreed with the Khangai and some wanted to be more specific to the Khotont Mountain. Many Chinese records left for further examination. In addition to many historical events, the Chinese records provided some important description about the religious life of the Ötükän, and the Dujin, appeared in a couple of early records, in fact was the older form of the Ötükän.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ötükän
• yıš
• the Turkic official records

Ötüken Üzerine Bazı Düşünceler

Abstract

The Ötükän Mountain was Mecca of the Turks from 552 to 840. The essay has collected 22 Turkic and 84 Chinese records about the Ötükän Mountain, and mainly examined the geographical location the Ötükän. The Turkic records clearly indicated the Ötükän was the whole Khangai Mountains. The Chinese official records agreed with the Khangai and some wanted to be more specific to the Khotont Mountain. Many Chinese records left for further examination. In addition to many historical events, the Chinese records provided some important description about the religious life of the Ötükän, and the Dujin, appeared in a couple of early records, in fact was the older form of the Ötükän.

Keywords

• Ötükän
• yıš
• the Turkic official records

References

1. AALTO, P. et alii (1958). “Materialien zu den alttürkischen Inschriften der Mongolei”, Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne, 60/71: 3-91.
2. AMINEV, Z. G. (2006). “Kul’t Svyatsennoy Drevnix Tyurkov Ötüken i ee Sledı u Başkir”, Problemı Etnogeneza i Etniçeskoy İstorii Başkirskogo Naroda, Materiali Vserossiyskoy Nauçno-Praktiçeskoy Konferentsii (Ufa, 2006), Gılem, Ufa: 26-29.
3. AYDEMİR, A. (2010). “Ötüken ve Ötüken Adı Üzerine”, Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları, 187: 197-222.
4. AYDIN, E. (2007). “Ötüken Adı ve Yeri Üzerine Düşünceler”, Turkish Studies, 2/4: 1262-1269.
5. BANG-KAUP, W. (1980). Berlin’deki Macar Enstitüsünden Türkoloji Mektupları (1925-1934), Çev. Ş. TEKİN, Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi Yayınları.
6. BAO, Wensheng (2010). “Gu Dai Tu Jue Yu Dou Jin Shan Kao”, Meng Gu Shi Yan Jiu, 10: 54-62.
7. BLAIR, S. (1995). A Compendium of Chronicles: Rashid Al-Din’s Illustrated History of the World, London: The Khalili Collections.
8. BOSWORTH, C. E. (1995). “Ötükän”, Encyclopedia of Islam, Brill, 8: 231a-b.

9. BOYLE, J. A. (1958). History of the World Conqueror by Ala-Ad-Din Ata Malik Ju-vaini, Manchester: University Press
10. BUSHAKOV, V. (2007). “Etimologiya ta lokalizatsiya Davn’otyurks’kogo Xoronima Ötüken”, Visnik L’vivs’kogo Universitetu, 42: 192-196.
11. CEN, Zhongmian (1939). “Wai Meng Yu Dou Jin Shan Kao” (Zhong Yang Yan Jiu Yuan Shi Yu Suo Ji Kan Ba Ben San Fen); Tu Jue Ji Shi, 1958/2: 1085-1088.
12. CHAVANNES, E. (2006). Batı Türkleri Tarihi, Çev. M. SİRMAN, İstanbul: Töre Yayınları.
13. CLAUSON, Sir G. (1972). An Etymological Dictionary of Pre-Thirteenth Century Turkish, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. CZEGLÉDY, K. (1962). “Čoγay-Quzï, Qara-Qum, Kök-Öng”, Acta Orientalia Acaemiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 15/3: 55-69.
15. DANKOFF, R.; J. KELLY (1982). Mahmut el-Kāşгarī: Compendium of the Turkic Dialects (Dīvān Luγāt at-Türk), Part I, Harvard: Harvard University Press.
16. DANKOFF, Robert (1983). Wisdom of Royal Glory (Kutadgu Bilig): a Turko-Islamic Mirror for Princes, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
17. DİNG, Qian (1915). Xin Tang Shu Xue Yan Tuo Chuan Di Li Kao Zheng, Zhe Jiang Tu Shu Guan Cong Shu.
18. DOERFER, G. (1965). Türkische und Mongolische Elemente im Neupersischen, un-ter besonderer Berücksichtigung alterer Neupersischer Geschichtsquellen, vor ailem der Mangolen- und Timuridenszeit. Band II, Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.
19. DROBYSHEV, Yu. İ. (2012). “Srednevekovıy Ötüken”, Vostok, 4: 5-22.
20. ERDAL, M. (1991). Old Turkic Word Formation, a functional approach to the lexicon, Vol. I-II, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
21. ESİN, E. (1976). “Ötüken Yış (Türk Sanatında Ağaçlı Dağ Hakkında Notlar)”, Atsız Armağanı, Ed. E. GÜNGÖR et al. Ötüken Yayınları, İstanbul: 147-186.
22. FENG, Chengjun; Lu JUNLİNG (1982). Xi Yu Di Ming, Bei Jing: Zhong Hua Shu Ju.
23. GABAIN, A. von (1950). “Steppe und Stadt im Leben der ältesten Türken”, Der Is-lam, 29: 30 - 62.
24. GIRAUD, R. (1960). L’Empire des Turcs Célestes. Les règnes d’Elterich, Qapghan et Bilgä (680-734), contribution à l'histoire des Turcs d’Asie centrale, Paris: Libraire d’Amérique de d’Orient et d’Orient Adrien-Maisonneuve.
25. GOLDEN, P. B. (2002). Türk Halkları Tarihine Giriş, Çev. O. KARATAY, Çorum: KaraM.
26. GÖMEÇ, S. 2000. “Şine-Usu Yazıtı’nda geçen Yer Adları Üzerine”, Türk Tarih Kurumu Belleten, 240: 427-433.
27. HAMILTON, J. R. (1997). “Tokuz Uygur ve On Oguz”, Çev. Y. KOÇ; İ. BİRKAN, Türk Dilleri Araştırmaları, 7: 187-232.
28. HIRTH, F. (1899). Nachworte zur Inschrift des Tonyukuk: die alttürkischen Inschriften der Mongolei, Zweite Folge, St. Pétersburg.
29. HUANG, Wenbi (1964). “Yi Dou Hu Gao Chang Wang Shi Xun Bei Fu Yuan Bing Xiao Ji”, Wen Wu,2: 35.
30. Jİ, Yun et alii (1781). “Nan Bei Shi Shi Xiao Lu”, Qin Ding Si Ku Quan Shu,Shi Bu Ba.
31. JİNG, Fangchang (1890). “Dong Bei Yu Di Shi Lue”, Zhong Guo Dong Bei Di Li Zhi.
32. JISL, L. (1963). “Kül-Tegin Anıtında 1958’de Yapılan Arkeoloji Araștırmalarının Sonuçları”, Türk Tarih Kurumu Belleten, 107: 387-410.
33. KAMALOV, A. (2001). “Turks and Uighurs during the Rebellion of An Lu-Shan Shih Ch’ao-yi (755-762)”, Central Asiatic Journal, 45/2: 243-253.
34. KAMALOV, A. (2003). “The Moghon Shine Usu Inscription as the Earliest Uighur Historical Annals”, Central Asiatic Journal, 47/1: 77-90.
35. KARATAY, O. (2007). “Ötüken Yıș: Dağ, Orman ve Ülke”, Omeljan Pritsak Armağanı, Ed. M. ALPARGU; Y. ÖZTÜRK, Sarkaya Üniversitesi Basımevi, Sakarya: 131-139.
36. KATAYAMA, A. (1999). “Tariat Inscription”, Provisional Report of Researches on Historical Sites and Inscriptions in Mongolia from 1996 to 1998, Eds. T. MORIYASU; A. OCHIR, Osaka University, Osaka: 168-176.
37. KLYASHTORNY, S. G. (1982). “The Terkhin Inscription”, Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 36/3: 335-366.
38. KONOVALOV, P. B. (1999). Etniçeskiye Aspektı İstorii Tsenral’noy Azii (Drevnost’ Srednevekov’ye), Ulan-Ude.
39. LE COQ, A. von (1912). Türkische Manichaica aus Chotscho I. Berlin (AKPAW. Phil.-hist. Cl. 1911. Anhang: Abhandlungen nicht zur Akademie gehöriger Gelehrter: 6).
40. LE COQ, A. von (1922). Türkische Manichaica aus Chotscho III. Berlin (AKPAW. Phil.-hist. Cl. 1922. Anhang: Abhandlungen nicht zur Akademie gehöriger Gelehrter: 3).
41. LİN, Enxian (1988). tu jue yan jiu, tai wan: shang wu.
42. LİU, Yitang (1990). tu hui yan jiu, tai bei: jing shi shu ju.
43. LUO, Xin (2005). “Hui Gu Ya Zhang Cheng Lue Ying”, Wen Shi Zhi Shi.
44. MARQUART, J. (1914). Über das Volkstum der Komanen, Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.
45. MELİORANSKİY, P. M. (1899). Pamyatnik’ v’ Çest’ Kül’ Tegina, S. Petersburg: Tipografiya İmperatorskoy Akademii Nauk’.
46. MINORSKY, V. (1948). “Tamīm ibn Baḥr’s Journey to the Uyghurs”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 12/2: 275-305.
47. ÖGEL, B. (1957). “Doğu Göktürkleri Hakkında Vesikalar ve Notlar”, Türk Tarih Kurumu Belleten, 81: 81-131.
48. ÖLMEZ, M. (2012). Moğolistan’daki Eski Türk Yazıtları, Orhon-Uygur Hanlığı Dönemi: Metin-Çeviri-Sözlük, Ankara: Bilge-Su Yayıncılık.
49. ORKUN, H. N. (1936-1941). Eski Türk Yazıtları I-IV, İstanbul: Devlet Basımevi.
50. PELLIOT P. (1929). “Neuf notes sur des questions d’Asie centrale”, T’oung Pao, Second Series, 26/5: 201-266.
51. POTAPOV, L. P. (1957). “Novıye Dannıye o Drevnetyurkskom”, Sovyetskoye Vostokovedeniye, 1: 106-117.
52. QI, Zhaonan (1761). Shui Dao Ti Gang, Shang Hai: Wen Rui Lou.
53. RACHEWILTZ, I. de (1973). “Some Remarks on the Ideological Foundations of Chingis Khan’s Empire” Papers on Far Eastern History, Canberra: 21-36.
54. RADLOFF, W. (1895). Die alttürkischen Inschriften der Mongolei, St. Petersburg: Buchdruckerei der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
55. RADLOFF, W. (1897). Die alttürkischen Inschriften der Mongolei, neue Folge, Nebst einer Abhandlung von W. BARTHOLD: die historische Bedeutung der alttürkischen Inschriften, St. Petersburg: Buchdruckerei der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
56. RADLOFF, W. (1928). Uigurische Sprachdenkmäler, Materialien nach dem Tode des Verfassers mit Ergänzungen von S. Malov Herausgegeben, Leningrad.
57. RÄSÄNEN, M. (1957). Materialien zur Morphologie der Türkischen Sprachen, Helsinki: Societas Orientalis Fennica.
58. SCHUBERT, J. (1964). “Zum Begriff und zur Lage des Ötükän”, Ural Altasiche Jahrbücher, 35: 213-218.
59. SERTKAYA, O. F. (2003). “Yıs (Yıș?)/Yisi/Yis/Yiș Kelimesi ve Akrabaları Üzerine”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araștırmaları Dergisi, 13: 1-10.
60. SERTKAYA, O. F.; S. HARCAVBAY (2001). “Hoyto-Tamir (Moğolistan)’dan Yeni Yazıtlar (Ön Neşir)”, Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı Belleten 2000: 313-346.
61. Sever, Mustafa (2015). “Ötüken Yıș” (www.altayli.net).
62. SHIRATORI, K. (1907). “Dong Hu Min Zu Kao”, Shi Xue Za Zhi, 18.
63. TAN, Qixiang (1982). Zhong Guo Li Shi Di Tu Ji 1-8. Shang Hai: Zhong Guo Di Tu Chu Ban She.
64. TEKİN, T. (1983a). “Kuzey Moğolistan’da Yeni Bir Uygur Anıtı: Taryat (Terhin) Kitabesi”, Türk Tarih Kurumu Belleten, 184: 795-838.
65. TEKİN, T. (1983b). “The Tariat (Terkhin) Inscription”, Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 37/3: 43-68.
66. TEKİN, T. (1994). Tunyukuk Yazıtı, İstanbul: Simurg.
67. THOMSEN, V. (1896). Inscriptions de l’Orkhon déchiffrées, Helsingfors: Impr. de la Société de littérature finnoise.
68. THOMSEN, V. (2002). Orhon Yazıtları Araştırmaları: [1.] Orhon ve Yenisey Yazıtlarının Çözümü İlk Bildiri; [2.] V. Thomsen Tarafından Çözülmüş Orhon Yazıtları; [3.] Yenisey Yazıtlarındaki İyi Değerlendirilmemiş Bir Harf; [4.] Turcica, Çeviren ve Yayıma Haz. V. KÖKEN, Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
69. TIVANENKO, А. V. (1994). Drevne Svyatilitşa Vostosçnoy Sibiri v Epoxu Rannego srednevekov’ya, Novosibirsk: Nauka.
70. VLADİMİRTSEV, B. Ya. (1929). “Po Povodu Drevnetyukskogo Ötüken Yış”, Doklad AN SSSR, 7: 133-135.
71. WANG, Guowei (1923). Guan Tang Ji Lin Xia, Zhong Hua Shu Ju.
72. WANG, Li (1985). Han Yu Yu Yin Shi, Bei Jing: Zhong Guo She Hui Ke Xue Chu Ban She.
73. WANG, Xiaopu (2007). “Bai Huo Jiao Yu Tu Jue Xing Shua I Yi Gu Dai Tu Jue Dou Zhan Shen Yan Jiu Wei Zhong Xin”, Li Shi Yan Jiu: Di Qi.
74. XUE, Zongzheng (1992). Tu Jue Shi, Bei Jing: Zhong Guo She Hui Ke Xue Chu Ban She.
75. YAN, Gengwang (1985). Tang Dai Jiao Tong Tu Kao Tai Beiz: Hong Yang Yan Jiu Yuan Shi Yu Suo.
76. Yİ, Zuola (1996). Shi Tan Gu Dai Tu Jue Yu Ötüken - Mo Yi Ci Ci Yuan”, Yu Yan Yu Fan Yi.
77. YU, Hao (1847). Xi Yu Kao Gu Lu, Wen Hai Chu Ban She.
78. ZHANG, Mu (1991). Meng Gu You Mu Ji, Shan Xi Ren Min Chu Ban She.