AGYAGÁSI, K. Chuvash Historical Phonetics, an Areal Linguistic Study, with an Appendix on the Role of Proto-Mari in the History of Chuvash Vocalism, Harrassowitz Verlag, Wiesbaden, 2019, XII+334 pp. ISBN: 978-3-447-11163-8

Year 2019, , 624 - 633, 24.06.2019

Peter Piispanen

https://doi.org/10.35236/jots.581515

Abstract

AGYAGÁSI, K. Chuvash Historical Phonetics, an Areal Linguistic Study, with an Appendix on the Role of Proto-Mari in the History of Chuvash Vocalism, Har-rassowitz Verlag, Wiesbaden, 2019.

Keywords

Chuvash Historical Phonetics, an Areal Linguistic Study, with an Appendix on the Role of Proto-Mari in the History of Chuvash Vocalism

References

• CINCIUS, V. I. (1975). Sravnitel’nyj Slovar’ Tunguso-Man’žurskix Jazykov I, Leningrad: Akademia Nauka.
• CLAUSON, Sir G. (1972). Etymological dictionary of Prethirteenth Century Turkish, Oxford: Clarendon.
• DOERFER, G. (1963–1967). Türkische und Mongolische Elemente im Neupersischen I–III, Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.
• DYBO, A. & Yu. V. NORMANSKAIA (2012). “K drevneishim samodiisko-tungusskim leksicheskim sviaziam (na materiale slov, opisyvayushchikh faunu)”, Man and Nature in the Altaic World. Proceedings of the 49th Permanent International Altaistic Conference (Berlin, July 30-Aug. 4, 2006), Eds. B. KELLNER-HEINKELE et al. Klaus Schwarz Verlag, Berlin: 99–115.
• DYBO, A. (2014). “Early contacts of Turks and problems of Proto-Turkic reconstruction”, Tatarica: Language 2: 7–17.
• FEDOTOV, M. R. (1996). Ėtimologičeskij slovar’ čuvaškogo jazyka, Tom II: Sav-Yaštaka, Čeboksary: Čuvaškij gosudarstvennyj institut gumanitarnyx nauk.
• GEORG, S. et al. (1998). “Telling general linguists about Altaic”, Journal of Linguistics, 35/1: 65-98.
• HELIMSKI, E. (1995). “Samoyedic Loans in Turkic: Check-List of Etymologies”, Laut- und Wortgeschichte der Türksprachen: Beiträge des internationalen Symposiums (Berlin, 7. bis 10. Juli 1992), Hrsg. von B. KELLNER-HEİNKELE & M. STACHOWSKİ, Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden: 75–95.
• JANKOWSKI, H. (2013). “Altaic languages and historical contact”, Current Trends in Altaic Linguistics: A Festschrift for Professor Emeritus Seong BAEGIN on his 80th Birthday, Ed. K. JUWON & K. DONGHO, Altaic Society of Korea, Seoul: 523-545.
• KALLIO, P. (2006). “On the Earliest Slavic Loanwords in Finnic”, The Slavicization of the Russian North: Mechanisms and Chronology, Slavica Helsingiensia 27: 154-166.
• PİİSPANEN, P. S. (2018). “Turkic lexical borrowings in Samoyed”, Acta Linguistica Petropolitana, 14/3: 357-383.
• PİİSPANEN, P. S. (2019). “Additional Turkic and Tungusic borrowings into Yukaghir II”, Journal of Old Turkic Studies, 3/1: 54-82.
• RÄSANEN, M. (1969). Versuch eines etymologisches Wörterbuchs der Türksprachen, Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
• RÓNA-TAS, A. (1988). “Turkic Influence on the Uralic Languages”, The Uralic Languages, Description, History and Foreign Influences, Ed. D. SINOR, E. J. Brill, Leiden–New York–København–Köln: 742–780.
• SEVORTJAN, E. V. (1974). Ėtimologičeskij slovar’ tjurskix jazykov I, Moscow: Izdatel’stvo “Nauka”.
• STAROSTİN, S. et al. (2003). An Etymological Dictionary of Altaic Langua-ges I-III, Leiden: Brill.
• TENİŠEV, E. R. (1997). Sravnitel’noistoričeskaja grammatika tjurskix jazykov: Leksika, Moscow: Akademia Nauk.
• VOVİN, A. (2018). “An Interpretation of the Khüis Tolgoi Inscription”, Journal Asiatique, 306/2: 303-313.