Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

KAMU YÖNETİMİ PERSPEKTİFİNDEN SDG16’NIN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: SİSTEMATİK BİR LİTERATÜR TARAMASI

Year 2023, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 1 - 18, 30.06.2023

Abstract

Birleşmiş Milletler tarafından 2015 yılında kabul edilen ve global düzeyde sürdürülebilir kalkınmayı hedefleyen
Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları (SKA) bir çerçeve mutabakat metni özelliği taşımaktadır. Ekonomik, sosyal ve çevresel
konularda dünyanın yüzleştiği en ağır sorunları ele alarak bu sorunların çözümüne yönelik olarak belirlediği gerçekleşebilir
hedefleri (2030 ‘a kadar) somut veriler ışığında izleme ve değerlendirme amacında olan SKA’lar 17 amaçtan oluşmakta ve
sürdürülebilir kalkınmanın bir nevi yol haritası niteliğini taşımaktadır. Belirli varyasyonlarla tüm dünya ülkeleri için formüle
edilen SKA'lar, sürdürülebilir kalkınmanın önündeki çeşitli sistemik ve yapısal engelleri (sosyal, yapısal, ekonomik ve
ekolojik sorunlar vb.) ele alarak bu engelleri aşma ve daha fazla ilerleme sağlama amacı gütmektedir. Bu kapsamda ülkeler
gelişmişlik düzeylerine göre ele alınarak karşılıklı işbirliği çerçevesinde yerel, bölgesel ve global sorunların çözümünde her
ülkeye kendi gelişmişlik durumuna göre verilen rollerin gerçekleştirilip gerçekleştirilmediği ya da hangi düzeyde
gerçekleştirildiği yıllık yayınlanan raporlarla istatistiki bilgiler ışığında izlenmektedir. SKA’ların uygulamalarda istenen
sonuçları verebilmesinin temel koşulu; kamu yönetimine, ulusal politikalara, stratejilere ve uygulama planlarına dahil
edilmeleridir. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı kamu yönetimini yakından ilgilendiren SKA 16’nın akademik düzeyde tartışıldığı
alanları keşifsel bir araştırma deseniyle inceleyerek önerilerde bulunmaktır. SKA 16 sürdürülebilir kalkınma için barışçıl ve
kapsayıcı toplumları teşvik ederek her düzeyde etkili, hesap verebilir ve kapsayıcı kurumlar oluşturmak ve herkesin adalete
erişimini sağlamak amacını gerçekleştirmek üzere oluşturulmuştur. SKA16’yı incelemek amacıyla 12 hedef ve bu hedeflerin
gerçekleştirilme durumunu izlemek için geliştirilen 24 göstergeye dayalı olarak Web of Science veri tabanında yer alan
makaleler incelenmiştir. İncelenen makaleler doğrultusunda sistematik literatür taraması yönetimi ile mevcut durum
değerlendirilmesi yapılarak geleceğe dair önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

References

  • Botero, J. C., Pinzon-Rondon, A. M., & Pratt, C. S. (2016). How, when and why do governance, justice and rule of law indicators fail public policy decision making in practice?. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 8, 51-74.
  • Gallo, P. J., Sosa, S., & Velez-Calle, A. (2023). Business for peace: How entrepreneuring contributes to Sustainable Development Goal 16. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 26(1), 62-78.
  • Hemingway, P., & Brereton, N. (2009). What is a systematic review. What is, 1(8).Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(2004), 1-26.
  • Laberge, M., & Touihri, N. (2019). Can SDG 16 data drive national accountability? A cautiously optimistic view. Global Policy, 10, 153-156.
  • Liu, H., Lee, C., & Alden, C. (2022). The Dynamics of Governance and Sustainable Development Goals in the Global South. Global Policy, 13, 5-10.
  • Massey, A. (2022). Sustainable Development Goals and their Fit with Good Governance. Global Policy, 13, 79-85
  • Milton, S. (2021). Higher education and sustainable development goal 16 in fragile and conflict-affected contexts. Higher Education, 81(1), 89-108.
  • Misra, A., Okewu, E., Misra, S., & Fernández-Sanz, L. (2022). Deep Neural Network Model for Evaluating and Achieving the Sustainable Development Goal 16. Applied Sciences, 12(18), 9256.
  • Moratis, L., & Melissen, F. (2022). Bolstering responsible management education through the sustainable development goals: Three perspectives. Management Learning, 53(2), 212-222.
  • Ramcharan, R. (2021). SDG 16 and the human rights architecture in Southeast Asia: A complementary protection process. Journal of human rights, 20(2), 228-244.
  • Satterthwaite, M. L., & Dhital, S. (2019). Measuring access to justice: Transformation and technicality in SDG 16.3. Global Policy, 10, 96-109.
  • Sisto, R., García López, J., Quintanilla, A., de Juanes, Á., Mendoza, D., Lumbreras, J., & Mataix, C. (2020). Quantitative analysis of the impact of public policies on the sustainable development goals through budget allocation and indicators. Sustainability, 12(24), 10583.
  • The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2016, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2016/the%20sustainable%20development%20goals%20report%202016.pdf
  • The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2017, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2016/the%20sustainable%20development%20goals%20report%202017.pdf
  • The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2018, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/report/2018/thesustainabledevelopmentgoalsreport2018-en.pdf
  • The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2019, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2019/The-SustainableDevelopment-Goals-Report-2019.pdf
  • The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2020/
  • The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2021, https://desapublications.un.org/publications/sustainabledevelopment-goals-report-2021
  • The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/
  • Thérien, J. P., & Pouliot, V. (2020). Global governance as patchwork: the making of the Sustainable Development Goals. Review of International Political Economy, 27(3), 612-636
Year 2023, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 1 - 18, 30.06.2023

Abstract

References

  • Botero, J. C., Pinzon-Rondon, A. M., & Pratt, C. S. (2016). How, when and why do governance, justice and rule of law indicators fail public policy decision making in practice?. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 8, 51-74.
  • Gallo, P. J., Sosa, S., & Velez-Calle, A. (2023). Business for peace: How entrepreneuring contributes to Sustainable Development Goal 16. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 26(1), 62-78.
  • Hemingway, P., & Brereton, N. (2009). What is a systematic review. What is, 1(8).Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(2004), 1-26.
  • Laberge, M., & Touihri, N. (2019). Can SDG 16 data drive national accountability? A cautiously optimistic view. Global Policy, 10, 153-156.
  • Liu, H., Lee, C., & Alden, C. (2022). The Dynamics of Governance and Sustainable Development Goals in the Global South. Global Policy, 13, 5-10.
  • Massey, A. (2022). Sustainable Development Goals and their Fit with Good Governance. Global Policy, 13, 79-85
  • Milton, S. (2021). Higher education and sustainable development goal 16 in fragile and conflict-affected contexts. Higher Education, 81(1), 89-108.
  • Misra, A., Okewu, E., Misra, S., & Fernández-Sanz, L. (2022). Deep Neural Network Model for Evaluating and Achieving the Sustainable Development Goal 16. Applied Sciences, 12(18), 9256.
  • Moratis, L., & Melissen, F. (2022). Bolstering responsible management education through the sustainable development goals: Three perspectives. Management Learning, 53(2), 212-222.
  • Ramcharan, R. (2021). SDG 16 and the human rights architecture in Southeast Asia: A complementary protection process. Journal of human rights, 20(2), 228-244.
  • Satterthwaite, M. L., & Dhital, S. (2019). Measuring access to justice: Transformation and technicality in SDG 16.3. Global Policy, 10, 96-109.
  • Sisto, R., García López, J., Quintanilla, A., de Juanes, Á., Mendoza, D., Lumbreras, J., & Mataix, C. (2020). Quantitative analysis of the impact of public policies on the sustainable development goals through budget allocation and indicators. Sustainability, 12(24), 10583.
  • The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2016, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2016/the%20sustainable%20development%20goals%20report%202016.pdf
  • The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2017, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2016/the%20sustainable%20development%20goals%20report%202017.pdf
  • The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2018, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/report/2018/thesustainabledevelopmentgoalsreport2018-en.pdf
  • The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2019, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2019/The-SustainableDevelopment-Goals-Report-2019.pdf
  • The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2020/
  • The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2021, https://desapublications.un.org/publications/sustainabledevelopment-goals-report-2021
  • The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/
  • Thérien, J. P., & Pouliot, V. (2020). Global governance as patchwork: the making of the Sustainable Development Goals. Review of International Political Economy, 27(3), 612-636
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Public Administration
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Salih Börteçine Avci

Muhammet Vural This is me

Publication Date June 30, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 3 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Avci, S. B., & Vural, M. (2023). KAMU YÖNETİMİ PERSPEKTİFİNDEN SDG16’NIN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: SİSTEMATİK BİR LİTERATÜR TARAMASI. Kamu Ekonomisi Ve Kamu Mali Yönetimi Dergisi, 3(1), 1-18.