Taylor Kuralının Türkiye Örneğinde Tahmini

Abstract

Taylor kuralı, merkez bankalarının politika faizini enflasyon-çıktı açığına göre mekanik olarak ayarlayabileceğini ileri süren basit bir para politikası kuralıdır. Bu çalışma Taylor kuralını Türkiye ekonomisi özelinde test etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu kapsamda, Türkiye ekonomisinin 2003:1-2019:4 dönemine ait üçer aylık veriler ve bazı zaman serisi yöntemlerinden (VAR) yararlanılmıştır. Yapılan analiz sonucunda, Türkiye’de faizlerin Taylor Kuralı’na göre hareket etmediğine yönelik bulgular tespit edilmiştir. Bu ampirik sonuç, söz konusu dönem için ana amacı fiyat istikrarının tesisi olan TCMB’nin temel hedefi ile uyumlu değildir. Para politikasından sorumlu Merkez Bankası’nın faiz politikalarını oluştururken enflasyonda oluşabilecek hareketlenmelere daha çok dikkat etmesi gerektiği ifade edilebilir.

Keywords

• Taylor Kuralı
• Faiz Oranları
• Para Politikası
• Vektör Otoregresif Modeller
• Enflasyon Hedeflemesi

What the Taylor Rule Predicts for the Case of Turkiye

Abstract

The Taylor rule is a simple monetary policy that suggests how central banks can mechanically arrange their interest policies in accordance with inflation-output deficit. This study aims to test the Taylor rule on the Turkish economy in particular. In this context, the study uses quarterly data from 2003 Q1-2019 Q4 for the Turkish economy along side certain vector autoregression (VAR) models as a time series method. As a result of the performed analyses, the interest rates in Turkiye were determined to not occur in accordance with the Taylor rule. This empirical result does not conform with the basic objective of the Turkish Central Bank, whose goal was to maintain price stability for this period. Thus, the Central Bank, being responsible of monetary policies, can be said to need to pay attention to the movements of inflation when establishing interest policies.

Keywords

• Taylor Rule
• Interest Rates
• Monetary Policy
• Vector Autoregressive Models
• Inflation Targeting

References

1. Adolfson, M. (2007). Incomplete exchange rate pass-throught and simple monetary policy rules. Journal of International Money and Finance, 26(3), 468-494. google scholar
2. Akalın, G. ve Tokucu, E. (2007). Kurala dayalı-takdire dayalı para politikaları: Taylor kuralı ve Türkiye’de enflasyon hedeflemesi uygulaması. Marmara Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 22(1), 37-55. google scholar
3. Albayrak, N., & Abdioğlu, Z. (2015). Estimating backward and forward-looking monetary policy reaction functions: Taylor rule. Suleyman Demirel University The Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 20(4), 141-163. google scholar
4. Ardor, H. M. ve Varlık, S. (2014). İleriye dönük yeni Keynesyen para politikası reaksiyon fonksiyonunun tahmini: Taylor kuralı’nın, Mccallum kuralı’nın, Taylor-Mccallum melez kuralı’nın Türkiye ekonomisinde geçerliliği. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 24(89), 45-71. google scholar
5. Arnold, I., & Vrugt, E. (2012). Forecasting with the Taylor rule. Applied Financial Economics, 22, 1501-1510. google scholar
6. Bal, H., Tanrıöver, B. ve Erdoğan, E. (2016). Taylor kuralı kapsamında merkez bankası politika faiz oranlarının belirlenmesi stokastik trend yaklaşımı. International Journal of Academic Value Studies, 2(6), 95-106. google scholar
7. Barradas, R. (2014). The new keynesian model: An empirical application to the euro area economy. Journal of Money, Investment and Banking, 29, 79-102. google scholar
8. Barro, R. J., & Gordon, D. B. (1983). Rules, discretion and reputation in a model of monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12, 101-22. google scholar

9. Batini, N., & Haldane, A. (1999). Forward-looking rules for monetary policy, monetary policy rules. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. google scholar
10. Bec, F., Salem, M. B., & Collard, F. (2002). Asymmetries in monetary policy reaction function evidence for the U.S., French and German central banks. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 6(2), 1-26. google scholar
11. Berument, H., & Taşçı, H. (2003). Monetary policy rules in practice evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 9, 33-38. google scholar
12. Bunzel, H., & Enders, W. (2010). The Taylor rule and “opportunistic” monetary policy. Creates Research Paper, 4, 1-30. google scholar
13. Castelnuovo, E. (2003). Taylor rules, omitted variables and interest rate Smoothing in the US. Economic Letters, 81, 2655-59. google scholar
14. Castro, V. (2008). Are central banks following a linear or nonlinear (augmented) Taylor rule?. NIPE, Working Paper, 19. google scholar
15. Chadha, J. S., & Nolan, C. (2007). Optimal simple rules for the conduct of monetary and fiscal policy. Journal of Macroeconomics, 29(4), 665-689. google scholar
16. Chakraborty, A., & Evans, G.W. (2008). Can perpetual learning explain the forward-premium puzzle?. Journal of Monetary Economics, 55, 477-490. google scholar
17. Chen, C., Yao, S., & Ou, J. (2017). Exchange rate dynamics in a Taylor rule framework. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 46, 158-173. google scholar
18. Clarida, R., Gali, J., & Gertler, M. (1998). Monetary policy rules in practice: Some international evidence. European Economic Review, 42, 1033-1067. google scholar
19. Clarida, R., Gali, J., & Gertler, M. (2001). Optimal monetary policy in open versus close economies: an integrated approach. American Economic Review, 91, 248-52. google scholar
20. Cogley, T., & Sargent, T. J. (2005). Drifts and volatilities: monetary policies and outcomes in the post WWII US. Review of Economic Dynamics, 8(2), 262-302. google scholar
21. Cukierman, A., & Muscatelli, A. (2008). Nonlinear Taylor rules and asymmetric preferences: central banking: evidence from the United Kingdom and the United States. Journal of Macroeconomics, 8(1), 1-31. google scholar
22. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators of autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427-431. google scholar
23. Dolado, J., Maria-Dolores, R., & Naveira, M. (2000). Asymmetries in monetary policy rules: Evidence for four central banks. Centre for Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper Series, 2441. google scholar
24. Drumetz, F., & Vendelhan, A. (1997). The Taylor rule: Application and limits. Banque De France Bulletin Digest, 46, 35-41. google scholar
25. Eğilmez, M. ve Kumcu, E. (2006). Ekonomi Politikası. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi. google scholar
26. Engel, C., & West, K. (2006). Taylor rules and the deutschmark-dollar real exchange rate. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 38, 1175-1194. google scholar
27. Fernandez, A., & Nikolsko-Rzhevskyy, A. (2007). Measuring the Taylor rule’s performance. Economics Letter, 2(6), 1-7. google scholar
28. Gali, J., & Monacelli, T. (2004). Monetary policy and exchange rate volatility in a small open economy. Review of Economic Studies, 72(3), 707-734. google scholar
29. Gascoigne, J., & Turner, P. (2003). Asymmetries in bank of England monetary policy. Applied Economics Letters, 11(10), 615-618. google scholar
30. Gerlach, S., & Schnabel, G. (2000). The Taylor rule and interest rates in the EMU area. Economics Letters, 67, 165-171. google scholar
31. Gorter, J., Jacobs, J., & Haan, J. D. (2008). Taylor rules for the ECB using expectations data. The Scandavian Journal of Economics, 110(3), 473-488. google scholar
32. Greiber, C., & Herz, B. (2000). Taylor rules in open economies. Working Paper, Bayreuth University. google scholar
33. Hayat, A., & Mishra, S. (2010). Federal reserve monetary policy and the non-linearity of the Taylor rule. Economic Modelling, 27, 1292-1301. google scholar
34. Hofmann, B., & Bogdanova, B. (2012). Taylor rules and monetary policy: A global “great deviation. BIS Quarterly Review Monetary and Economic Department, 37-46. google scholar
35. Hsing, Y. (2004). Estimating the bank of Japan’s monetary policy reaction function. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 57(229), 169-183. google scholar
36. Judd, J., & Rudebusch, G. (1998). Taylor’s rule and the fed: 1970-1997. Federal Reserve Bank of SanFrancisco, Economic Review, 3, 3-16. google scholar
37. Kazdağlı, H. (1996). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Merkez Bankası’nın kuruluş tarihçesi ve 1934-1938 dönemindeki para politikasının VAR yöntemiyle analizi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 14(2), 35-52. google scholar
38. Kendall, R., & Ng, T. (2013). Estimated Taylor rules updated for the post crisis period. Reserve Bank of New Zealand Analytical Note Series, No. AN2013/04. Zealand: Reserve Bank of New. google scholar
39. Koustas, Z., & Lamarche, F. (2010). Instrumental variable estimation of a nonlinear Taylor rule. Empirical Economics, 42(1), 1-2. google scholar
40. Kuzin, V. (2006). The Inflation aversion of the bundesbank: A state-space approach. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 30, 1671-1686. google scholar
41. Lansing, K. J., & Ma, J. (2017). Explaining exchange rate anomalies in a model with Taylor-rule fundamentals and consistent expectations. Journal of International Money and Finance, 70, 62-87. google scholar
42. Leitemo, K., & Söderström, U. (2005). Simple monetary policy rules and exchange rate uncertainty. Journal of International Money and Finance, 24(3), 481-507. google scholar
43. Leigh, D. (2008). Estimation the federal reserve’s implicit ınflation target: A state spave approach. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 32, 2013-2030. google scholar
44. Lee J., & Crowley P. M. (2009). Evaluating the stresses from ECB monetary policy in the euro area. Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers, 1, 1-26. google scholar
45. Lubik, T. A., & Schorfheide, F. (2004). Testing for indeterminacy: An application to U.S. monetary policy. American Economic Review, 94, 190-217. google scholar
46. Lui, Y., & Enders, W. (2003). Out-of-sample forecasts and nonlinear model selection with an example of the term structure of interest rates. Southern Economic Journal, 69, 520-540. google scholar
47. Lovrinovic, I. & Benazic, M. (2004). A VAR analysis of monetary transmission mechanism in the european union. Zagreb International Review of Economics-Business, 7(2), 27-42. google scholar
48. Machaj, M. (2016). Can the Taylor rule be a good guidance for policy? The case of 2001-2008 real estate bubble. Prague Economic Papers, 25(4), 381-395. google scholar
49. Mark, N. (2009). Changing monetary policy rules, learning, and real exchange rate dynamics. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 41, 1047-1070. google scholar
50. Markov, N., & Nitschka, T. (2013). Estimating Taylor rules for Switzerland: Evidence from 2000 to 2012. Swiss National Bank Working Papers, 8, 1-41. google scholar
51. Martin, C., & Milas, C. (2004). Modelling monetary policy: Inflation targeting in practice. Economica, 71(282), 209-221. google scholar
52. Molodtsova, T., & Papell, D. H. (2008). Out-of-sample exchange rate predictability with Taylor rule fundamentals. Journal of International Economics, 77(2), 167-180. google scholar
53. Moura, M. L., & De Carvalho, A. (2010). What Can Taylor rules say about monetary policy in Latin America?. Journal of Macroeconomics, 32, 392-404. google scholar
54. Nelson, C. M. (2005). Changing monetary policy rules, learning, and real exchange rate dynamics. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, no. 11061. google scholar
55. Nobay, R., & Peel, D. (2003). Optimal discretionary monetary policy in a model of asymmetric central bank preferences. Economic Journal, 113, 657-665. google scholar
56. Orphanides, A. (2004). Monetary policy rules, macroeconomic stability, and inflation: A view from the trenches. Journal of Monetary, Credit, and Banking, 36, 151-175. google scholar
57. Österholm, P. (2005). The Taylor rule and real-time data-a critical appraisal. Applied Economic Letters, 12, 679-685. google scholar
58. Özcan, M. (2016). Asymmetric Taylor monetary rule: The case of Turkey. Eurasian Academy of Sciences Social Sciences Journal, 10, 68-92. google scholar
59. Özgen, F. B. ve Güloğlu, B. (2004). Türkiye’de iç borçların iktisadi etkilerinin VAR tekniği ile analizi. METU Studies in Development, 3, 93-114. google scholar
60. Özyurt, H. (2003). Para Teorisi ve Politikası. Trabzon: Derya Kitabevi. google scholar
61. Qin, T., & Enders, W. (2008). In-Sample and out-of-sample properties of linear and nonlinear Taylor rules. Journal of Macroeconomics, 30, 428-443. google scholar
62. Pakko, M. R. (2005). On the information content of asymmetric FOMC policy statements: Evidence from a Taylor-rule perspective. Economic Inquiry, 43, 558-569. google scholar
63. Peersman, G., & Smets, F. (1999). The Taylor rule: A useful monetary policy benchmark for the euro area?. International Finance, 2(1), 85-116. google scholar
64. Peker, O. ve Sümer Ladin, A. (2018). Yeni Keynesyen yaklaşım perspektifinde optimal Taylor kuralı: Türkiye örneği. Bankacılar Dergisi, 107, 77-96. google scholar
65. Perruchoud, A. (2009). Estimating a Taylor rule with Markov Switching regimes for Switzerland. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 145(2), 187-220. google scholar
66. Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75, 335-346. google scholar
67. Rudebusch, G., & Svensson, L. (1999). Policy rules for ınflation targetingmonetary policy rules. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. google scholar
68. Shibamoto, M. (2008). The Estimation of monetary policy reaction function in a data-rich environment: The case of Japan. Japan and the World Economy, 20(4), 497-520. google scholar
69. Smets, F., & Wouters, R. (2002). Openness, imperfect exchange rate pass-through and monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 49(5), 913-940. google scholar
70. Sims, C., & Zha, T. (2006). Were there regime Switches in U.S. monetary policy?. American Economic Review, 96(1), 54-81. google scholar
71. Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrica, 48, 1-48. google scholar
72. Soybilgen, B., & Eroğlu, B. A. (2019). Time-varying Taylor rule estimation for Turkey with flexible least square method. Boğaziçi Journal Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, 33(2), 122-139. google scholar
73. Stock, J. H., &Watson, M. W. (2001). Vector Autoregressions (VARs). Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 101-115. google scholar
74. Svensson, L. E. O. (2003). What is wrong with Taylor rules? Using judgment in monetary policy through Targeting rules. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(2), 426-477. google scholar
75. Tan, S. H., & Habibullah, M. S. (2007). Business cycles and monetary policy asymmetry: An investigation using Markov-Switching models. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 380, 297-306. google scholar
76. Tarı, R. (2010). Ekonometri (6. Baskı). Kocaeli: Umuttepe Yayınları. google scholar
77. Taylor, J. B. (1993). Discretion versus policy rules in practise. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, 195-214. google scholar
78. Taylor, J. B. (1996). Policy rules as a means to a more effective monetary policy. BOJ Monetary and Economic Studies, 14(1), 28-39. google scholar
79. Taylor, J. B. (2001). The role of the exchange rate in monetary-policy rules. American Economic Review, 91, 263-267. google scholar
80. Taylor, M. P., & Davradakis, E. (2006). Interest rate setting and inflation targeting: Evidence of a nonlinear Taylor rule for the United Kingdom. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics &Econometrics, 10(4), 1-18. google scholar
81. Teles, V. K., & Zaidan, M. (2007). Taylor principle and inflation stability in emerging market countries. Journal of Development Economics, 91(1), 180-191. google scholar
82. Tokatlıoğlu, M. ve Selen, U. (2019). Maliye politikası. Bursa: Ekin Yayınevi. google scholar
83. Tracey, M. (2005). A VAR analysis of the effects of macroeconomic shocks on banking sector loan quality in Jamaica. Financial Stability Department, Bank of Jamaica, 1-38. google scholar
84. Us, V. (2007). Alternative monetary policy rules in the Turkish economy under an inflation-targeting framework. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 43(2), 82-101. google scholar
85. Woodford, M. (2001). The Taylor rule and optimal monetary policy. American Economic Review, 90, 232-237. google scholar
86. Wollmershauser, T. (2006). Should Central Banks React to Exchange Ratemovements? An Analysis of the Robustness of Simple Policy Rulesunder Exchange Rate Uncertainty. Journal of Macroeconomics, 28, 493-519. google scholar
87. Yazgan, M. E., &. Yılmazkuday, H. (2004). Monetary policy rules in practice: Evidence from Turkey and Israel. Applied Financial Economics, 17(1), 1-14. google scholar
88. Yamak, R. ve Yamak, N. (1999). Türkiye’de genel milletvekili seçimleri ve ekonomi. İktisat İşletme Finans Dergisi, 155(14), 47-56. google scholar
89. Yamak, R. ve Köseoğlu, M. (2006). Uygulamalı istatistik ve ekonometri (3. Baskı). Trabzon: Celepler Matbaacılık. google scholar
90. Yamak, R. ve Korkmaz, A. (2006). Prebisch-Singer hipotezi ve küçük açık ekonomi varsayımı. Selçuk Üniversitesi Karaman İİBF Dergisi, 10, 128-143. google scholar
91. Zhu, Y., & Chen, H. (2017). The Asymmetry of US monetary policy: Evidence from a threshold Taylor rule with time-varying threshold values. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 473, 522-535. google scholar