Genome-Wide Patterns of Runs of Homozygosity in Barka Indigenous Chickens

Abstract

Runs of homozygosity (ROH) provide insight into population history, inbreeding, and selection. In this study, genome-wide ROH patterns were evaluated in Barka indigenous chicken reared under scavenging systems in arid and semi-arid lands (ASALs), by stratifying segments by length and assessing their chromosomal distribution and gene content. Average ROH length varied across chromosomes, with the longest tracts observed on chromosomes 1, 2, 3 and 4, and shorter segments on chromosomes 11 and 28, indicating a heterogeneous genomic landscape. Gene-level analysis indicated that significant (P<0.05) associations were confined to a small subset of loci within the intermediate ROH category (1-2 Mb), notably LHX8 and YAP1. LHX8 encodes a LIM homeobox transcription factor essential for oocyte differentiation and early folliculogenesis, while YAP1 is a central effector of Hippo signalling pathway regulating cell proliferation, organ size and tissue homeostasis functions potentially linked to reproductive fitness and adaptive resilience under resource-limited ASAL conditions. These findings suggest that ROH patterns in ASAL-adapted Barka indigenous chickens reflect a combination of recent and historical demographic processes shaped by low-input scavenging systems. The limited but functionally relevant gene enrichment supports the role of localized selection on key biological pathways, while the broader genomic background remains largely neutral.

Keywords

• Genomic
• Chicken
• Breeding
• Improvement

References

1. Abraham, E., Kostina, A., Volmert, B., Roule, T., Huang, L., Yu, J., Williams, A. E., Megill, E., Douglas, A., & Pericak, O. M. (2025). A retinoic acid: YAP1 signaling axis controls atrial lineage commitment. Cell Reports, 44(5).
2. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.
3. Berghof, T. V. L., Bedere, N., Peeters, K., Poppe, M., Visscher, J., & Mulder, H. A. (2024). The genetics of resilience and its relationships with egg production traits and antibody traits in chickens. Genetics Selection Evolution, 56(1), 20.
4. Ceballos, F. C., Joshi, P. K., Clark, D. W., Ramsay, M., & Wilson, J. F. (2018). Runs of homozygosity: windows into population history and trait architecture. Nature Reviews Genetics, 19(4), 220–234.
5. Chang, C. C., Chow, C. C., Tellier, L. C. A. M., Vattikuti, S., Purcell, S. M., & Lee, J. J. (2015). Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience, 4(1), s13742-015.
6. Curik, I., Ferenčaković, M. and Sölkner, J., Curik, I., Ferenčaković, M., & Sölkner, J. (2014). Inbreeding and runs of homozygosity: A possible solution to an old problem. Livestock Science, 166, 26–34.
7. Curik, I., Ferenčaković, M., & Sölkner, J. (2014). Inbreeding and runs of homozygosity: A possible solution to an old problem. Livestock Science, 166, 26–34.
8. Danecek, P., Auton, A., Abecasis, G., Albers, C. A., Banks, E., DePristo, M. A., Handsaker, R. E., Lunter, G., Marth, G. T., & Sherry, S. T. (2011). The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics, 27(15), 2156–2158.

9. Ferencakovic, M., Hamzic, E., Gredler, B., Curik, I., & Sölkner, J. (2011). Runs of homozygosity reveal genome-wide autozygosity in the Austrian Fleckvieh cattle. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, 76(4), 325–329.
10. Ferenčaković, M., Hamzić, E., Gredler, B., Solberg, T. R., Klemetsdal, G., Curik, I., & Sölkner, J. (2013). Estimates of autozygosity derived from runs of homozygosity: empirical evidence from selected cattle populations. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 130(4), 286–293.
11. Fleming, D. S. (2016). Examination of the genomic architecture of divergent poultry populations that underlies adaptation, tolerance, and resilience to environmental stressors. Iowa State University.
12. Formoso, K., Susperreguy, S., Freichel, M., & Birnbaumer, L. (2020). RNA-seq analysis reveals TRPC genes to impact an unexpected number of metabolic and regulatory pathways. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 7227. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61177-x
13. Goli, R. C., Mahar, K., Chishi, K. G., Choudhary, S., Rathi, P., Sree, C. C., Haritha, P., Sukhija, N., & Kanaka, K. K. (2024). Runs of homozygosity assessment using reduced representation sequencing highlight the evidence of random mating in emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae). Genome, 68, 1–8.
14. Hoffmann, A. A., & Sgrò, C. M. (2011). Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature, 470(7335), 479–485.
15. Hu, G., Do, D. N., Gray, J., & Miar, Y. (2020). Selection for favorable health traits: a potential approach to cope with diseases in farm animals. Animals, 10(9), 1717.
16. Kanehisa, M., Furumichi, M., Sato, Y., Ishiguro-Watanabe, M., & Tanabe, M. (2021). KEGG: integrating viruses and cellular organisms. Nucleic Acids Research, 49(D1), D545–D551.
17. Kolberg, L., Raudvere, U., Kuzmin, I., Adler, P., Vilo, J., & Peterson, H. (2023). g: Profiler—interoperable web service for functional enrichment analysis and gene identifier mapping (2023 update). Nucleic Acids Research, 51(W1), W207–W212.
18. Krambrich, J., Bringeland, E., Hesson, J. C., Hoffman, T., Lundkvist, Å., Lindahl, J. F., & Ling, J. (2022). Usage of FTA® Classic Cards for Safe Storage, Shipment, and Detection of Arboviruses. Microorganisms, 10(7), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071445
19. Li, G., Tang, J., Huang, J., Jiang, Y., Fan, Y., Wang, X., & Ren, J. (2022). Genome-wide estimates of runs of homozygosity, heterozygosity, and genetic load in two Chinese indigenous goat breeds. Frontiers in Genetics, 13, 774196.
20. listed, N. authors. (2022). GeneCards®: The Human Gene Database. Weizmann Institute of Science.
21. Liu, L., Liu, B., Wang, L., Li, C., Zhou, Y., Zhu, J., Ding, J., Liu, S., & Cheng, Z. (2023). Sohlh1 and Lhx8 are prominent biomarkers to estimate the primordial follicle pool in mice. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 21(1), 46.
22. Macharia, J. K., Kim, J., Kim, M., Cho, E., Munyaneza, J. P., & Lee, J. H. (2024). Characterisation of runs of homozygosity and inbreeding coefficients in the red-brown Korean native chickens. Animal Bioscience, 37(8), 1355.
23. Magothe, T. M., Okeno, T. O., Muhuyi, W. B., & Kahi, A. K. (2012). Indigenous chicken production in Kenya: I. Current status. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 68(1), 119–132.
24. Mastrangelo, S., Ben-Jemaa, S., Perini, F., Cendron, F., Biscarini, F., Lasagna, E., Penasa, M., & Cassandro, M. (2023). Genome-wide mapping of signatures of selection using a high-density array identified candidate genes for growth traits and local adaptation in chickens. Genetics Selection Evolution, 55(1), 20.
25. Mastrangelo, S., Ciani, E., Sardina, M. T., Sottile, G., Pilla, F., Portolano, B., & Consortium, Bi. Ov. I. (2018). Runs of homozygosity reveal genome‐wide autozygosity in Italian sheep breeds. Animal Genetics, 49(1), 71–81.
26. Muchadeyi, F. C., & Dzomba, E. F. (2017). Adaptation of Low Input Extensively Raised Chickens. Poultry Science, 211.
27. Ngeno, K., Van Der Waaij, E. H., Megens, H. J., Kahi, A. K., Van Arendonk, J. A. M., & Crooijmans, R. (2015). Genetic diversity of different indigenous chicken ecotypes using highly polymorphic MHC-linked and non-MHC microsatellite markers. Animal Genetic Resources/Resources Génétiques Animales/Recursos Genéticos Animales, 56, 1–7.
28. Panigrahi, M., Rajawat, D., Nayak, S. S., Ghildiyal, K., Sharma, A., Jain, K., Lei, C., Bhushan, B., Mishra, B. P., & Dutt, T. (2023). Landmarks in the history of selective sweeps. Animal Genetics, 54(6), 667–688.
29. Peripolli, E., Munari, D. P., Silva, M., Lima, A. L. F., Irgang, R., & Baldi, F. (2017). Runs of homozygosity: current knowledge and applications in livestock. Animal Genetics, 48(3), 255–271.
30. Purcell, S., Neale, B., Todd-Brown, K., Thomas, L., Ferreira, M. A. R., Bender, D., Maller, J., Sklar, P., De Bakker, P. I. W., & Daly, M. J. (2007). PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 81(3), 559–575.
31. Purfield, D. C., Berry, D. P., McParland, S., & Bradley, D. G. (2012). Runs of homozygosity and population history in cattle. BMC Genetics, 13, 1–11.
32. Rege, J. E. O., Ochieng, J., & Hanotte, O. (2020). Livestock genetics and breeding. In The Impact of the International Livestock Research Institute (pp. 59–102). CABI Wallingford UK.
33. Rostamzadeh Mahdabi, E., Esmailizadeh, A., Han, J., & Wang, M. (2025). Comparative analysis of runs of homozygosity islands in indigenous and commercial chickens revealed candidate loci for disease resistance and production traits. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 11(1), e70074.
34. Sharma, P., Doultani, S., Hadiya, K. K., George, L. B., & Highland, H. N. (2024). Overview of marker-assisted selection in animal breeding. HISTORY, 9, 11.
35. Tan, X., Liu, L., Dong, J., Huang, M., Zhang, J., Li, Q., Wang, H., Bai, L., Cui, M., & Zhou, Z. (2024). Genome-wide detections for runs of homozygosity and selective signatures reveal novel candidate genes under domestication in chickens. BMC Genomics, 25(1), 485.
36. Weiler, J. I., & Fernando, R. L. (2020). Strategies for the improvement of animal production using marker-assisted selection. In Gene-Mapping Techniques and Applications (pp. 305–328). CRC Press.
37. Xu, N.-Y., Liu, Z.-Y., Yang, Q.-M., Bian, P.-P., Li, M., & Zhao, X. (2022). Genomic analyses for selective signatures and genes involved in hot adaptation among indigenous chickens from different tropical climate regions. Frontiers in Genetics, 13, 906447.
38. Zhang, Q., Guldbrandtsen, B., Bosse, M., Lund, M. S., & Sahana, G. (2015). Runs of homozygosity and distribution of functional variants in the cattle genome. BMC Genomics, 16, 1–16.
39. Zhi, Y., Wang, D., Zhang, K., Wang, Y., Geng, W., Chen, B., Li, H., Li, Z., Tian, Y., & Kang, X. (2023). Genome-wide genetic structure of Henan indigenous chicken breeds. Animals, 13(4), 753.