ATAK-S Erkek Civcivlerinin Farklı Yetiştirme Sistemlerinde Büyüme Performansları ve Karkas Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, yumurta verim yönlü bir hat olan ATAK-S genotipi erkek civcivlerinin kapalı ve serbest (free range) yetiştirme sistemlerinde et verim yönü incelenmiştir. Çalışma, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi (KSÜ), Hayvansal Üretim Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezinde,12 hafta süre ile yürütülmüştür. Kapalı yetiştirme sistemi grubunda 3 tekerrür, her tekerrür için 7,5 m² kapalı alan, serbest (free range) yetiştirme sistemi grubunda yine 3 tekerrür, her tekerrür için 7,5 m² kapalı alan ve buna ilave olarak 31,25 m² yonca ekili serbest gezinti alanı bırakılmıştır. Her tekerrürde 28 adet, toplam 168 adet civciv kullanılmıştır. Her iki muamele grubuna aynı yemler sınırsız verilmiştir. Çalışmada kapalı ve serbest yetiştirme sistemi için; canlı ağırlık, yem tüketimi, yem dönüşüm oranı, yaşama gücü, karkas-parça oranları, yenilebilir iç organ ağırlıkları-oranları, testis ağırlıkları-oranları, rektal sıcaklık ve tonik immobilite süreleri incelenmiştir. İncelenen özelliklerden but oranı serbest yetiştirme sisteminde daha fazla, boyun oranı ise kapalı yetiştirme sistemde daha fazla bulunmuş, incelenen diğer özellikler arasında istatistiki olarak fark bulunmamıştır.

Keywords

• ATAK-S erkek civcivleri
• Yetiştirme sistemleri
• Besi performansı
• Karkas özellikleri

Determination of Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of ATAK-S Male Chicks in Different Raising Systems

Abstract

In this study, meat production performance of male chicks of the ATAK-S genotype, which is an egg-yielding line, were examined in both indoor and free range raising systems. The study was carried out at the Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University (KSU), Animal Production Application and Research Centre for 12 weeks. Each treatment was represented by 3 replications containing of 28 male chicks (84 male chicks per treatment). During the indoor treatment, the chicks were raised in floor pens in a conventional house (3.7 birds/m2). In the free-range treatment, the chickens were housed in a similar indoor house (3.7 birds/m2); in addition, they also had a free-range clover paddock (0.9 birds/m2). All birds were provided with the same diets as ad-libitum. Results showed that the thigh rate of the chickens in the free-range treatment were higher than that of the chickens in the indoor floor treatments, but the neck rate of the chickens in the free-range treatment were lower than that of the chickens in the indoor floor treatments. There was no significant effect of the free-range raising system on live weight, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, survival rate, eviscerated carcass, breast, thighs, wings, back rates, edible giblets, testes weight, rectal temperature and tonic immobility.

Keywords

• Atak-S male chicks
• Raising systems
• Growth performance
• Carcass characteristics
• Welfare

References

1. Almasi, A., Andrassyne, B.G., Milisits, G., Kustosne, P.O., Suto, Z., 2015. Effects of Different Rearing Systems on Muscle and Meat Quality Traits of Slow-and Medium-Growing Male Chickens. British Poult. Sci. 56(3):320-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2015.1016478
2. Barac, T., 2016. Serbest Dolaşımlı ve Kapalı Sistemde Yetiştirilen Atak-S Genotipi Erkeklerinin Besi Performansı ve Karkas Özellikleri Bakımından Karşılaştırılması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. B.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, BİNGÖL
3. Bolan, N. S., Szogi, A. A., Chuasavathi, T., Seshadri, B., Rothrock, M. J., Panneerselvam, P., 2010. Uses and Management of Poultry Litter. World's Poult. Sci. J. 66(4):673-698. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933910000656
4. Czajka, E.S., Skomorucha, I., Muchacka, R., 2017. Effect of Organic Production System on The Performance and Meat Quality of Two Purebred Slow-Growing Chicken Breeds. Ann. Anim. Sci. 17(4):1197–1213 https://doi.org/10.1515/aoas-2017-0009
5. Eleroğlu, H., Yıldırım, A., Şekeroğlu, A., Duman, M., 2013. Yavaş Gelişen İki Farklı Genotipin Organik Sistemde Refah Parametrelerinin Karşılaştırılması. Türkiye II. Organik Hayvancılık Kongresi, 24-26 Ekim, Bursa.
6. Eleroğlu, H., Yıldırım, A., 2019. The Welfare Parameters of Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris) Fed Diets Supplemented with Dry Oregano (Origanum vulgare L.) Leaf under the Organic System. Journal of Poultry Research 16(2):74-79. https://doi.org/10.34233/jpr.654870
7. Hoan, N.D., Khoa, M.A., 2016. Meat Quality Comparison Between Fast Growing Broiler Ross 308 and Slow Growing Sasso Laying Males Reared in Free Range System. J. Sci. & Devel 14(1):101-108. http://www1.vnua.edu.vn/tapchi/Upload/1132016-TC%20so%201.2016%20ban%20bong4_13.pdf
8. Poltowicz, K., Doktor, J., 2012. Effect of Slaughter Age on Performance and Meat Quality of Slow-Growing Broiler Chickens. Annals of Anim. Sci.12(4):621-631. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10220-012-0052-0

9. Sarica, M., Yamak, U.S., 2010. Developing Slow Growing Meat Chickens and Their Properties. Anadolu J. Agric. Sci. 25(1):61-67.
10. Sarica, M., Yamak, U. M., Boz, M. A., 2014. Comparing Growth and Carcass Traits of Slow Growing Chicken Parents with Pure Egg Type Parents and Commercial Broilers. Hayvansal Üretim 55(2):1-8. https://doi.org/10.29185/hayuretim.363919
11. Siekmann, L., Meier-Dinkel, L., Janisch, S., Altmann, B., Kaltwasser, C., Sürie, C., Krischek, C., 2018. Carcass Quality, Meat Quality and Sensory Properties of the Dual-Purpose Chicken Lohmann Dual. Foods 7(10):156. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7100156
12. SPSS. (2013). IBM United States Software Announcement 213-309, dated August 13, 2013
13. Stadig, L. M., Rodenburg, T. B., Reubens, B., Aerts, J., Duquenne, B., Tuyttens, F.A., 2016. Effects of Free-Range Access on Production Parameters and Meat Quality, Composition and Taste in Slow-Growing Broiler Chickens. Poult. Sci. 95(12):2971-2978. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew226
14. TSE, 1997. Turkish Standards Institute. The rules of chicken carcass cutting up, TS April 5890, Ankara, Turkey.
15. Wang, K.H., Shi, S.R., Dou, T.C., Sun, H.J., 2009. Effect of a Free-Range Raising System on Growth Performance, Carcass Yield, and Meat Quality of Slow-Growing Chicken. Poult. Sci. 88(10):2219-2223. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00423
16. Westgren, R.E., 1999. Delivering Food Safety, Food Quality, and Sustainable Production Practices: The Label Rouge Poultry System in France. American J. of Agricultural Economics, 81(5):1107-1111. http://www.jstor.com/stable/1244092
17. Yenilmez, F.,Uruk, E., 2016. Free Range System, Advantages and Disadvantages. Nevşehir Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, TARGİD Özel Sayı 5:315-324. https://doi.org/10.17100/nevbiltek.211018