Keel Bone Damage in Laying Hens

Year 2020, Volume: 17 Issue: 2, 50 - 55, 30.12.2020

Ekrem Laçin Ayşe Küreksiz

https://doi.org/10.34233/jpr.782964

Abstract

The use of alternative housing systems is increasing in response to the press of animal rights organisations and animal welfare-sensitive consumers. Pursuant to animal welfare legislation, it has become compulsory in the European Union member states to house laying hens in enriched cages or aviaries. However, one of the main problems associated with these housing systems is the frequent occurrence of skeletal damage, as a result of the reflexive movements of freely roaming animals. Owing to its protrusive anatomical structure, one of the most easily damaged skeletal parts is the sternum. Damage to the sternum is also referred to as keel bone damage. The term “keel bone damage” is used to describe bone deformities or fractures, which have long been named as bone anomalies in laying hens. Keel bone damage is a chronic disorder, which adversely affects the profitability of egg farms. Being a multifactorial disorder, it is difficult to identify the primary cause of keel bone damage, as many underlying reasons could be involved in its aetiology. Skilled and experienced practitioners can readily diagnose keel bone damage by palpating the sternal region. This study reviews the significance of keel bone damage for the egg sector and the welfare of laying hens.

Keywords

Keel bone damage, laying hens, , welfare, raising systems

References

• Altan A., Erensayın C., Bayraktar H., Kutlu H. R., Türkoğlu M., Sarıca M., Arda M., Elibol O., Yetişir R., Yamak U. S., 2018. "Ed. M. Türkoğlu, M. Sarıca, Tavukçuluk Bilimi (Yetiştirme, Besleme, Hastalıklar), s. 218-220, Bey Ofset Ankara.
• Andersson, B. (2017). Genetic aspects of keel bone deformities and fractures determined by palpation in laying hens. Lohmann Information, 51, 36-41.
• Anonymous 1 (2020). http://www.keelbonedamage.eu/activities/practical-information-for-stakeholders (ET: 23.08.2018). Anonymus 2 (2020). https://www.compassioninfoodbusiness.com/media/7436221/additional-guidance on multitier systems for laying hens (ET: Ocak.2019).
• Armstrong, E. A., Rufener, C., Toscano, M. J., Eastham, J. E., Guy, J. H., Sandilands, V., & Smulders, T. V. (2020). Keel bone fractures induce a depressive-like state in laying hens. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1-14.
• Baker, S. L., Robison, C. I., Karcher, D. M., Toscano, M. J., & Makagon, M. M. (2020). Keel impacts and associated behaviors in laying hens. Applied animal behaviour science, 222, 104886.
• Balkaya, H., Özdemir, D., & Özüdoğru, Z. (2016). Atmaca da Accipiter nisus Kanadın Superficial Kaslarının Makroanatomik Yapısı. Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi, 30(4), 23-28.
• Baur, S., Rufener, C., Toscano, M. J., & Geissbühler, U. (2020). Radiographic Evaluation of Keel Bone Damage in Laying Hens—Morphologic and Temporal Observations in a Longitudinal Study. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, 129.
• Bayraktar, B., Kılınç, B., Kılınç, A. A. 2018. Kanatlı Hayvan Beslemesinde Kalsiyum Fosfor Dengesinin Fizyolojik Rolü Ve Patolojik Etkilerinin İncelenmesi. II. Uluslararası Gevher Nesibe Sağlık Bilimleri Kongresi, 30 Kasım - 2 Aralık 2018, Ankara Türkiye, Bildiriler içinde (p.72-74).
• Bayraktar, H., Yalçın, S., Özkan, S., 2015. Kanatlı Hayvan Yetiştiriciliğinde Değişimler Ve Yeni Arayışlar. Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisliği VIII. Teknik Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, 12-16 Ocak 2015, Ankara Türkiye, (s. 838-859).
• Candelotto, L., Stratmann, A., Gebhardt-Henrich, S. G., Rufener, C., van de Braak, T., & Toscano, M. J. (2017). Susceptibility to keel bone fractures in laying hens and the role of genetic variation. Poultry science, 96(10), 3517-3528
• Casey-Trott, T. M., Guerin, M. T., Sandilands, V., Torrey, S., & Widowski, T. M. (2017). Rearing system affects prevalence of keel-bone damage in laying hens: a longitudinal study of four consecutive flocks. Poultry science, 96(7), 2029-2039.
• Chargo, N. J., Robison, C. I., Baker, S. L., Toscano, M. J., Makagon, M. M., & Karcher, D. M. (2019). Keel bone damage assessment: Consistency in enriched colony laying hens. Poultry science, 98(2), 1017-1022.
• Donaldson, C. J., Ball, M. E. E., & O’Connell, N. E. (2012). Aerial perches and free-range laying hens: The effect of access to aerial perches and of individual bird parameters on keel bone injuries in commercial free-range laying hens. Poultry science, 91(2), 304-315.
• Dukic-Stojcic, M., Peric, L., Relic, R., Bozickovic, I., Rodic, V., & Rezar, V. (2017). Keel bone damage in laying hens reared in different production systems in Serbia. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 33(4), 487-492.
• Eusemann, B. K., Patt, A., Schrader, L., Weigend, S., Thöne-Reineke, C., & Petow, S. (2020). The role of egg production in the etiology of keel bone damage in laying hens. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, 81.
• Ferrari, L., Lolli, S., & Ferrante, V. (2012). The effects of housing systems on laying hen welfare: Conventional vs. furnished cages. Zootecnıca ınternatıonal, 34(3), 32-37.
• Fleming, R. H., McCormack, H. A., McTeir, L., & Whitehead, C. C. (2004). Incidence, pathology and prevention of keel bone deformities in the laying hen. British poultry science, 45(3), 320-330.
• Gebhardt-Henrich, S. G., Rufener, C., & Stratmann, A. (2019). Improving intra-and inter-observer repeatability and accuracy of keel bone assessment by training with radiographs. Poultry science, 98(11), 5234-5240.
• Hardin, E., Castro, F. L. S., & Kim, W. K. (2019). Keel bone injury in laying hens: the prevalence of injuries in relation to different housing systems, implications, and potential solutions. World's Poultry Science Journal, 75(2), 285-292.
• Harlander-Matauschek, A., Rodenburg, T. B., Sandilands, V., Tobalske, B. W., & Toscano, M. J. (2015). Causes of keel bone damage and their solutions in laying hens. World's Poultry Science Journal, 71(3), 461-472.
• Heerkens, J. L. T., Delezie, E., Rodenburg, T. B., Kempen, I., Zoons, J., Ampe, B., & Tuyttens, F. A. M. (2016). Risk factors associated with keel bone and foot pad disorders in laying hens housed in aviary systems. Poultry science, 95(3), 482-488.
• İpek, A., & Sözcü, A. (2015). Alternatif kanatlı yetiştirme sistemlerinde yetiştirme pratikleri ve refah standartları. UÜ Ziraat Fak. Derg, 29, 133-146.
• Jung, L. (2019). Laying hen welfare-The prevention of feather pecking and keel bone damage. Doktora Tezi. Kassel Üniversitesi, ALMANYA.
• Jung, L., Niebuhr, K., Hinrichsen, L. K., Gunnarsson, S., Brenninkmeyer, C., Bestman, M., & Knierim, U. (2019). Possible risk factors for keel bone damage in organic laying hens. animal, 13(10), 2356-2364.)
• Kappeli, S., Gebhardt-Henrich, S. G., Fröhlich, E., Pfulg, A., Schaublin, H., & Stoffel, M. H. (2011). Effects of housing, perches, genetics, and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on keel bone deformities in laying hens. Poultry science, 90(8), 1637-1644.
• Özen, Ş., & Haspolat, K. (2003). D Vitamini, Kalsiyum, Kemik Metabolizması ve Psikiyatrik Bozukluklar. Klinik Psikiyatri 2003; 6: 102, 113.
• Petek, M. (2016). Non-cage housing systems and laying hen welfare: keel bone damage and feather pecking. Tropical Animal Science and Production (TASP 2016).
• Riber, A. B., Casey-Trott, T. M., & Herskin, M. S. (2018). The influence of keel bone damage on welfare of laying hens. Frontiers in veterinary science, 5, 6.
• Rufener, C., Baur, S., Stratmann, A., & Toscano, M. J. (2019). Keel bone fractures affect egg laying performance but not egg quality in laying hens housed in a commercial aviary system. Poultry science, 98(4), 1589-1600.
• Saraiva, S., Esteves, A., & Stilwell, G. (2019). Influence of different housing systems on prevalence of keel bone lesions in laying hens. Avian Pathology, 48(5), 454-459.
• Sirovnik, J., & Toscano, M. J. (2017). Restraining laying hens for radiographic diagnostics of keel bones. In Proceedings of the 10th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare. Ploufragan (p. 162).
• Stratmann, A., Fröhlich, E. K. F., Gebhardt-Henrich, S. G., Harlander-Matauschek, A., Würbel, H., & Toscano, M. J. (2015). Modification of aviary design reduces incidence of falls, collisions and keel bone damage in laying hens. Applied animal behaviour science, 165, 112-123.
• Stratmann, A., Fröhlich, E. K. F., Gebhardt-Henrich, S. G., Harlander-Matauschek, A., Würbel, H., & Toscano, M. J. (2016). Genetic selection to increase bone strength affects prevalence of keel bone damage and egg parameters in commercially housed laying hens. Poultry science, 95(5), 975-984.
• Thofner, I., Hougen, H. P., Villa, C., Lynnerup, N., & Christensen, J. P. (2020). Pathological characterization of keel bone fractures in laying hens does not support external trauma as the underlying cause. Plos one, 15(3).
• Toscano, M. J., Wilkins, L. J., Millburn, G., Thorpe, K., & Tarlton, J. F. (2013). Development of an ex vivo protocol to model bone fracture in laying hens resulting from collisions. Plos One, 8(6).
• Tracy, L. M., Temple, S. M., Bennett, D. C., Sprayberry, K. A., Makagon, M. M., & Blatchford, R. A. (2019). The Reliability and Accuracy of Palpation, Radiography, and Sonography for the Detection of Keel Bone Damage. Animals, 9(11), 894.
• Vits, A., Weitzenbürger, D., Hamann, H., & Distl, O. (2005). Production, egg quality, bone strength, claw length, and keel bone deformities of laying hens housed in furnished cages with different group sizes. Poultry science, 84(10), 1511-1519.