Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2023, Volume: 20 Issue: 2, 42 - 51, 27.12.2023
https://doi.org/10.34233/jpr.1408022

Abstract

Project Number

BAP-21201007

References

  • Adamski, M., Kuzniacka, J., Czarnecki, R., Kucharska-Gaca, J., Kowalska, E. 2017. Variation in Egg Quality Traits Depending on Storage Conditions. Pol. J. Natl. Sci, 32: 39-47.
  • Akpinar, G. C., Canogullari, S., Baylan, M., Alasahan, S., Aygun, A. 2015. The Use of Propolis Extract for the Storage of Quail Eggs. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 24(4): 427-435.
  • Akter, Y., Kasim, A., Omar, H., Sazili, A. Q. 2014. Effect of Storage Time and Temperature on the Quality Characteristics of Chicken Eggs. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 12(3&4): 87-92.
  • Akyurek, H., Okur, A. A. 2009. Effect of Storage Time, Temperature and Hen Age on Egg Quality in Free-Range Layer Hens. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8(10): 1953-1958.
  • Alsobayel, A., Albadry, M. 2011. Effect of Storage Period and Strain of Layer on Internal and External Quality Characteristics of Eggs Marketed in Riyadh Area. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 10(1): 41-45.
  • Avan, T., Alişarlı, M. 2002. Muhafaza Şartlarının Yumurtanın Fiziksel, Kimyasal Ve Mikrobiyolojik Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 13: 98-107.
  • Aygun, A., Sert, D. 2013. Effects of Vacuum Packing on Eggshell Microbial Activity and Egg Quality in Table Eggs under Different Storage Temperatures. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 93(7): 1626-1632.
  • Baylan, M., Canogullari, S., Ayasan, T., Copur, G. 2011. Effects of Dietary Selenium Source, Storage Time, and Temperature on the Quality of Quail Eggs. Biological Trace Element Research, 143(2): 957-964.
  • Bozkurt, Z. 2009. Kafes Ve Alternatif Sistemlerde Yumurtacıtavukların Refahı. Kocatepe Veteriner Dergisi, 2(1): 59-67.
  • Bozkurt, Z., Tekerli, M. 2009. The Effects of Hen Age, Genotype, Period and Temperature of Storage on Egg Quality. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(4): 517-524.
  • Chung, S. H., Lee, K.-W. 2014. Effect of Hen Age, Storage Duration and Temperature on Egg Quality in Laying Hens. International Journal of Poultry Science, 13(11): 634.
  • Directive, E. 1999. Council Directive 99/74/Ec of 19 July 1999 Laying Down Minimum Standards for the Protection of Laying Hens. Official journal of the European Communities, 203: 53-57.
  • Doğan, H. 2008. Adana ‘Da Satışa Sunulan Yumurtalarda Sunuş Çeşitliliği Ve Kalite Değişimi Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Zootekni Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 54.
  • Durmuş, İ. 2014. Yumurta Kalite Özelliklerinin Kuluçka Sonuçlarına Etkisi. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi, 3(2): 95-99.
  • Feddern, V., Prá, M. C. D., Mores, R., Nicoloso, R. d. S., Coldebella, A., Abreu, P. G. d. 2017. Egg Quality Assessment at Different Storage Conditions, Seasons and Laying Hen Strains. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 41: 322-333.
  • Funk, E. 1948. The Relation of the Yolk Index Determined in Natural Position to the Yolk Index as Determined after Separating the Yolk from the Albumen. Poultry Science, 27(3): 367.
  • Gavril, R., Usturoi, M. 2011. Effects of Temperature and Storage Time on Hen Eggs Quality. Lucrări Știinţifice, Seria Zootehnie, 56: 259-264.
  • Goger, H., Demirtas, S. E., Yurtogullari, S. 2016. A Selection Study for Improving Eggshell Colour in Two Parent Lines of Laying Hens and Their Hybrids. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 15(3): 390-395.
  • Haugh, R. 1937. The Haugh Unit for Measuring Egg Quality. United States egg and poultry magazine, 43: 522-555.
  • Jin, Y., Lee, K., Lee, W., Han, Y. 2011. Effects of Storage Temperature and Time on the Quality of Eggs from Laying Hens at Peak Production. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 24(2): 279-284.
  • Jones, D., Ward, G., Regmi, P., Karcher, D. 2018. Impact of Egg Handling and Conditions During Extended Storage on Egg Quality. Poultry science, 97(2): 716-723.
  • Kale, B., Aygün, A. 2022. Farklı Yetiştirme Sistemlerinden Elde Edilen Yumurtaların Farklı Sıcaklıklarda Depolanmasının Yumurta Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(3): 1550-1566.
  • Keener, K., McAvoy, K., Foegeding, J., Curtis, P., Anderson, K., Osborne, J. 2006. Effect of Testing Temperature on Internal Egg Quality Measurements. Poultry science, 85(3): 550-555.
  • Ketta, M., Tůmová, E. 2016. Eggshell Structure, Measurements, and Quality-Affecting Factors in Laying Hens: A Review. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 61(7): 299-309.
  • Lee, M. H., Cho, E. J., Choi, E. S., Sohn, S. H. 2016. The Effect of Storage Period and Temperature on Egg Quality in Commercial Eggs. 한국가금학회지, 43(1): 31-38.
  • Maman, A. H., Yildirim, I. 2022. The Effect of Short Periods of Incubation During Egg Storage (Spides) on Internal Egg Quality, Hatchability and Chick Quality of Long Stored Old Layer Breeder Eggs. European Poultry Science/Archiv für Geflügelkunde(353).
  • Nys, Y., Hincke, M., Arias, J., Garcia-Ruiz, J., Solomon, S. 1999. Avian Eggshell Mineralization. Poultry and Avian Biology Reviews, 10(3): 143-166.
  • Parmak, Z. A., Aygün, A. 2023. Effects of Different Viol Types on Egg Qualities in Table Eggs at Different Storage Temperatures. Poultry Studies, 20(1): 19-24.
  • Quan, T. H., Benjakul, S. 2018. Quality, Protease Inhibitor and Gelling Property of Duck Egg Albumen as Affected by Storage Conditions. Journal of food science and technology, 55(2): 513-522.
  • Quan, T. H., Benjakul, S. 2019. Duck Egg Albumen: Physicochemical and Functional Properties as Affected by Storage and Processing. Journal of food science and technology, 56(3): 1104-1115.
  • Rodríguez-Navarro, A. B., Domínguez-Gasca, N., Muñoz, A., Ortega-Huertas, M. 2013. Change in the Chicken Eggshell Cuticle with Hen Age and Egg Freshness. Poultry science, 92(11): 3026-3035.
  • Samiullah, S., Roberts, J., Chousalkar, K. 2014. Effect of Production System and Flock Age on Egg Quality and Total Bacterial Load in Commercial Laying Hens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 23(1): 59-70.
  • Samli, H., Agma, A., Senkoylu, N. 2005. Effects of Storage Time and Temperature on Egg Quality in Old Laying Hens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 14(3): 548-553.
  • Sariyel, V., Aygun, A., Coklar, H., Narinc, D., Akbulut, M. 2022. Effects of Prestorage Application of Gum Arabic Coating on the Quality of Table Eggs During Storage. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(3): 363-370.
  • Sert, D., Aygun, A., Demir, M. K. 2011. Effects of Ultrasonic Treatment and Storage Temperature on Egg Quality. Poultry science, 90(4): 869-875.
  • Silversides, F., Budgell, K. 2004. The Relationships among Measures of Egg Albumen Height, Ph, and Whipping Volume. Poultry science, 83(10): 1619-1623.
  • Silversides, F., Scott, TA. 2001. Effect of Storage and Layer Age on Quality of Eggs from Two Lines of Hens. Poultry science, 80(8): 1240-1245.
  • Şekeroğlu, A., Sarıca, M., Demir, E., Ulutaş, Z., Tilki, M., Saatçi, M. 2008. The Effects of Housing System and Storage Length on the Quality of Eggs Produced by Two Lines of Laying Hens. Archiv Fur Geflugelkunde, 72(3): 106-109.
  • Tayeb, I. T. 2012. Effects of Storage Temperature and Length on Egg Quality Parameters of Laying Hen. Journal of Animal Scientist, 1(2): 32-36.
  • Tunçer, P. (2006). İki Farklı Ticari Yumurtacı Tavuk Genotip’ine Ait Yumurtalarda Kalite Kriterlerinin Depolama Süresine Göre Değişimi Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü].
  • Tutkun, M., Denli, M., Demirel, R. 2018. Productivity and Egg Quality of Two Commercial Layer Hybrids Kept in Free-Range System. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 6(10): 1444-1447.
  • Türker, İ., Alkan, S., Akçay, S. 2017. Comparison of Domestic and Foreign Commercial Brown Layer Hens in Terms of Yield Characteristics in Freerange Raising System. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 5(7): 814-821.
  • Wells, R. (1968). A Study of the Hen’s Egg. British Egg Marketing Board Symposium, Edinburgh,
  • Wilson, P. W., Suther, C. S., Bain, M. M., Icken, W., Jones, A., Quinlan-Pluck, F., Olori, V., Gautron, J., Dunn, I. C. 2017. Understanding Avian Egg Cuticle Formation in the Oviduct: A Study of Its Origin and Deposition. Biology of Reproduction, 97(1): 39-49.
  • Wyburn, G., Johnston, H., Draper, M., Davidson, M. F. 1973. The Ultrastructure of the Shell Forming Region of the Oviduct and the Development of the Shell of Gallus Domesticus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology and Cognate Medical Sciences: Translation and Integration, 58(2): 143-151.
  • Yılmaz, A., Bozkurt, Z. 2008. Ana Yaşı, Depolama Süresi Ve Streç Filmle Paketlemenin Sofralık Yumurtaların Iç Ve Dış Kalite Özelliklerine Etkisi. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 48: 81-91.

The effect of different layer genotypes raised in the Free-range system on egg quality storage at different temperatures

Year 2023, Volume: 20 Issue: 2, 42 - 51, 27.12.2023
https://doi.org/10.34233/jpr.1408022

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of stored eggs obtained from different layer genotypes raised in a Free-range system on egg quality at different storage temperatures. Lohmann Brown, Lohmann Sandy, and ATAK-S were used as layer genotypes in the study. The study was performed in a 3x2 factorial design with three genotypes and two storage temperatures. A total of 300 table eggs were used in the study. Egg quality analysis was carried out on 100 eggs from each genotype. Eggs were stored in refrigerator (4±2°C) and at room temperature (22±2°C) for 28 days. Egg quality was determined in 10 eggs from each group after 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days of storage, and the effects of temperature, genotype, and temperature x genotype interaction were determined. In the study, the effects of genotype and storage temperature on egg weight loss, Haugh unit, yolk index, and albumen pH were determined to be significant (P<0.05). However, the interaction effects of storage temperature x genotype were not statistically significant for any period of storage on egg quality characteristics such as Haugh unit and albumen pH. As a result, it was determined that eggs stored at refrigerator temperature during the research, depending on the storage conditions, preserved their quality characteristics better than those stored at room temperature. The study concluded that the eggs of the ATAK-S genotype had a lower shelf life compared to those of the Lohmann Sandy and Lohmann Brown genotypes.

Supporting Institution

Selçuk University provided funding for this project (Project Number: BAP-21201007).

Project Number

BAP-21201007

References

  • Adamski, M., Kuzniacka, J., Czarnecki, R., Kucharska-Gaca, J., Kowalska, E. 2017. Variation in Egg Quality Traits Depending on Storage Conditions. Pol. J. Natl. Sci, 32: 39-47.
  • Akpinar, G. C., Canogullari, S., Baylan, M., Alasahan, S., Aygun, A. 2015. The Use of Propolis Extract for the Storage of Quail Eggs. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 24(4): 427-435.
  • Akter, Y., Kasim, A., Omar, H., Sazili, A. Q. 2014. Effect of Storage Time and Temperature on the Quality Characteristics of Chicken Eggs. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 12(3&4): 87-92.
  • Akyurek, H., Okur, A. A. 2009. Effect of Storage Time, Temperature and Hen Age on Egg Quality in Free-Range Layer Hens. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8(10): 1953-1958.
  • Alsobayel, A., Albadry, M. 2011. Effect of Storage Period and Strain of Layer on Internal and External Quality Characteristics of Eggs Marketed in Riyadh Area. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 10(1): 41-45.
  • Avan, T., Alişarlı, M. 2002. Muhafaza Şartlarının Yumurtanın Fiziksel, Kimyasal Ve Mikrobiyolojik Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 13: 98-107.
  • Aygun, A., Sert, D. 2013. Effects of Vacuum Packing on Eggshell Microbial Activity and Egg Quality in Table Eggs under Different Storage Temperatures. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 93(7): 1626-1632.
  • Baylan, M., Canogullari, S., Ayasan, T., Copur, G. 2011. Effects of Dietary Selenium Source, Storage Time, and Temperature on the Quality of Quail Eggs. Biological Trace Element Research, 143(2): 957-964.
  • Bozkurt, Z. 2009. Kafes Ve Alternatif Sistemlerde Yumurtacıtavukların Refahı. Kocatepe Veteriner Dergisi, 2(1): 59-67.
  • Bozkurt, Z., Tekerli, M. 2009. The Effects of Hen Age, Genotype, Period and Temperature of Storage on Egg Quality. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(4): 517-524.
  • Chung, S. H., Lee, K.-W. 2014. Effect of Hen Age, Storage Duration and Temperature on Egg Quality in Laying Hens. International Journal of Poultry Science, 13(11): 634.
  • Directive, E. 1999. Council Directive 99/74/Ec of 19 July 1999 Laying Down Minimum Standards for the Protection of Laying Hens. Official journal of the European Communities, 203: 53-57.
  • Doğan, H. 2008. Adana ‘Da Satışa Sunulan Yumurtalarda Sunuş Çeşitliliği Ve Kalite Değişimi Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Zootekni Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 54.
  • Durmuş, İ. 2014. Yumurta Kalite Özelliklerinin Kuluçka Sonuçlarına Etkisi. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi, 3(2): 95-99.
  • Feddern, V., Prá, M. C. D., Mores, R., Nicoloso, R. d. S., Coldebella, A., Abreu, P. G. d. 2017. Egg Quality Assessment at Different Storage Conditions, Seasons and Laying Hen Strains. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 41: 322-333.
  • Funk, E. 1948. The Relation of the Yolk Index Determined in Natural Position to the Yolk Index as Determined after Separating the Yolk from the Albumen. Poultry Science, 27(3): 367.
  • Gavril, R., Usturoi, M. 2011. Effects of Temperature and Storage Time on Hen Eggs Quality. Lucrări Știinţifice, Seria Zootehnie, 56: 259-264.
  • Goger, H., Demirtas, S. E., Yurtogullari, S. 2016. A Selection Study for Improving Eggshell Colour in Two Parent Lines of Laying Hens and Their Hybrids. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 15(3): 390-395.
  • Haugh, R. 1937. The Haugh Unit for Measuring Egg Quality. United States egg and poultry magazine, 43: 522-555.
  • Jin, Y., Lee, K., Lee, W., Han, Y. 2011. Effects of Storage Temperature and Time on the Quality of Eggs from Laying Hens at Peak Production. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 24(2): 279-284.
  • Jones, D., Ward, G., Regmi, P., Karcher, D. 2018. Impact of Egg Handling and Conditions During Extended Storage on Egg Quality. Poultry science, 97(2): 716-723.
  • Kale, B., Aygün, A. 2022. Farklı Yetiştirme Sistemlerinden Elde Edilen Yumurtaların Farklı Sıcaklıklarda Depolanmasının Yumurta Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(3): 1550-1566.
  • Keener, K., McAvoy, K., Foegeding, J., Curtis, P., Anderson, K., Osborne, J. 2006. Effect of Testing Temperature on Internal Egg Quality Measurements. Poultry science, 85(3): 550-555.
  • Ketta, M., Tůmová, E. 2016. Eggshell Structure, Measurements, and Quality-Affecting Factors in Laying Hens: A Review. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 61(7): 299-309.
  • Lee, M. H., Cho, E. J., Choi, E. S., Sohn, S. H. 2016. The Effect of Storage Period and Temperature on Egg Quality in Commercial Eggs. 한국가금학회지, 43(1): 31-38.
  • Maman, A. H., Yildirim, I. 2022. The Effect of Short Periods of Incubation During Egg Storage (Spides) on Internal Egg Quality, Hatchability and Chick Quality of Long Stored Old Layer Breeder Eggs. European Poultry Science/Archiv für Geflügelkunde(353).
  • Nys, Y., Hincke, M., Arias, J., Garcia-Ruiz, J., Solomon, S. 1999. Avian Eggshell Mineralization. Poultry and Avian Biology Reviews, 10(3): 143-166.
  • Parmak, Z. A., Aygün, A. 2023. Effects of Different Viol Types on Egg Qualities in Table Eggs at Different Storage Temperatures. Poultry Studies, 20(1): 19-24.
  • Quan, T. H., Benjakul, S. 2018. Quality, Protease Inhibitor and Gelling Property of Duck Egg Albumen as Affected by Storage Conditions. Journal of food science and technology, 55(2): 513-522.
  • Quan, T. H., Benjakul, S. 2019. Duck Egg Albumen: Physicochemical and Functional Properties as Affected by Storage and Processing. Journal of food science and technology, 56(3): 1104-1115.
  • Rodríguez-Navarro, A. B., Domínguez-Gasca, N., Muñoz, A., Ortega-Huertas, M. 2013. Change in the Chicken Eggshell Cuticle with Hen Age and Egg Freshness. Poultry science, 92(11): 3026-3035.
  • Samiullah, S., Roberts, J., Chousalkar, K. 2014. Effect of Production System and Flock Age on Egg Quality and Total Bacterial Load in Commercial Laying Hens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 23(1): 59-70.
  • Samli, H., Agma, A., Senkoylu, N. 2005. Effects of Storage Time and Temperature on Egg Quality in Old Laying Hens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 14(3): 548-553.
  • Sariyel, V., Aygun, A., Coklar, H., Narinc, D., Akbulut, M. 2022. Effects of Prestorage Application of Gum Arabic Coating on the Quality of Table Eggs During Storage. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(3): 363-370.
  • Sert, D., Aygun, A., Demir, M. K. 2011. Effects of Ultrasonic Treatment and Storage Temperature on Egg Quality. Poultry science, 90(4): 869-875.
  • Silversides, F., Budgell, K. 2004. The Relationships among Measures of Egg Albumen Height, Ph, and Whipping Volume. Poultry science, 83(10): 1619-1623.
  • Silversides, F., Scott, TA. 2001. Effect of Storage and Layer Age on Quality of Eggs from Two Lines of Hens. Poultry science, 80(8): 1240-1245.
  • Şekeroğlu, A., Sarıca, M., Demir, E., Ulutaş, Z., Tilki, M., Saatçi, M. 2008. The Effects of Housing System and Storage Length on the Quality of Eggs Produced by Two Lines of Laying Hens. Archiv Fur Geflugelkunde, 72(3): 106-109.
  • Tayeb, I. T. 2012. Effects of Storage Temperature and Length on Egg Quality Parameters of Laying Hen. Journal of Animal Scientist, 1(2): 32-36.
  • Tunçer, P. (2006). İki Farklı Ticari Yumurtacı Tavuk Genotip’ine Ait Yumurtalarda Kalite Kriterlerinin Depolama Süresine Göre Değişimi Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü].
  • Tutkun, M., Denli, M., Demirel, R. 2018. Productivity and Egg Quality of Two Commercial Layer Hybrids Kept in Free-Range System. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 6(10): 1444-1447.
  • Türker, İ., Alkan, S., Akçay, S. 2017. Comparison of Domestic and Foreign Commercial Brown Layer Hens in Terms of Yield Characteristics in Freerange Raising System. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 5(7): 814-821.
  • Wells, R. (1968). A Study of the Hen’s Egg. British Egg Marketing Board Symposium, Edinburgh,
  • Wilson, P. W., Suther, C. S., Bain, M. M., Icken, W., Jones, A., Quinlan-Pluck, F., Olori, V., Gautron, J., Dunn, I. C. 2017. Understanding Avian Egg Cuticle Formation in the Oviduct: A Study of Its Origin and Deposition. Biology of Reproduction, 97(1): 39-49.
  • Wyburn, G., Johnston, H., Draper, M., Davidson, M. F. 1973. The Ultrastructure of the Shell Forming Region of the Oviduct and the Development of the Shell of Gallus Domesticus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology and Cognate Medical Sciences: Translation and Integration, 58(2): 143-151.
  • Yılmaz, A., Bozkurt, Z. 2008. Ana Yaşı, Depolama Süresi Ve Streç Filmle Paketlemenin Sofralık Yumurtaların Iç Ve Dış Kalite Özelliklerine Etkisi. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 48: 81-91.
There are 46 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Poultry Farming and Treatment
Journal Section 20(2)
Authors

Cansu Bulut This is me 0000-0002-8995-8009

Ali Aygün 0000-0002-0546-3034

Project Number BAP-21201007
Publication Date December 27, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 20 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Bulut, C., & Aygün, A. (2023). The effect of different layer genotypes raised in the Free-range system on egg quality storage at different temperatures. Journal of Poultry Research, 20(2), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.34233/jpr.1408022
AMA Bulut C, Aygün A. The effect of different layer genotypes raised in the Free-range system on egg quality storage at different temperatures. JPR. December 2023;20(2):42-51. doi:10.34233/jpr.1408022
Chicago Bulut, Cansu, and Ali Aygün. “The Effect of Different Layer Genotypes Raised in the Free-Range System on Egg Quality Storage at Different Temperatures”. Journal of Poultry Research 20, no. 2 (December 2023): 42-51. https://doi.org/10.34233/jpr.1408022.
EndNote Bulut C, Aygün A (December 1, 2023) The effect of different layer genotypes raised in the Free-range system on egg quality storage at different temperatures. Journal of Poultry Research 20 2 42–51.
IEEE C. Bulut and A. Aygün, “The effect of different layer genotypes raised in the Free-range system on egg quality storage at different temperatures”, JPR, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 42–51, 2023, doi: 10.34233/jpr.1408022.
ISNAD Bulut, Cansu - Aygün, Ali. “The Effect of Different Layer Genotypes Raised in the Free-Range System on Egg Quality Storage at Different Temperatures”. Journal of Poultry Research 20/2 (December 2023), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.34233/jpr.1408022.
JAMA Bulut C, Aygün A. The effect of different layer genotypes raised in the Free-range system on egg quality storage at different temperatures. JPR. 2023;20:42–51.
MLA Bulut, Cansu and Ali Aygün. “The Effect of Different Layer Genotypes Raised in the Free-Range System on Egg Quality Storage at Different Temperatures”. Journal of Poultry Research, vol. 20, no. 2, 2023, pp. 42-51, doi:10.34233/jpr.1408022.
Vancouver Bulut C, Aygün A. The effect of different layer genotypes raised in the Free-range system on egg quality storage at different temperatures. JPR. 2023;20(2):42-51.

204x63 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 
Print ISSN:1302-3209 - Online ISSN:2147-9003

Journal of Poultry Research is indexed by the following national and international scientific indexing services

14964166171665216684166851668616687


166881668916692


1669016691