Research Article

CLASSIFYING ONLINE CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS: A MULTIAGENT PERSPECTIVE

Volume: 7 Number: 1 June 27, 2022
EN

CLASSIFYING ONLINE CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS: A MULTIAGENT PERSPECTIVE

Abstract

This study conducted a content analysis of an online Turkish complaint website to classify online customer complaints about service failures in multi-agent situations of a tourism service supply chain. A total of 400 incidents were collected regarding 422 service failures. The complaints fell into four failure groups: Actual Service, Supplier’s Service, Service Provider’s Employees, and Supplier’s Employees. The findings support the previous literature in a different context by demonstrating that, within a multi-agent context, customers consider the whole service delivery experience. They may therefore integrate or transfer their emotions or behavioral attitudes from the principals (e.g., travel agencies) to agents (e.g., hotels) or vice-versa.

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, J., (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67 (5), 422-436.
  2. Ahluwalia, R. (2000). Examination of psychological processes underlying resistance to persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (2), 217-232.
  3. Allen, A. M., Brady, M. K., Robinson, S. G., and Voorhees, C. M. (2015). One firm’s loss is another’s gain: capitalizing on other firms’ service failures. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(5), 648-662.
  4. Basu, A.K., Lal, R., Srinivasan, V. and Staelin, R. (1985). Salesforce compensation plans: an agency theoretic perspective. Marketing Science, 4 (4), 267-291.
  5. Baker, M.A. and Magnini, V.P. (2016) The evolution of services marketing, hospitality marketing and building the constituency model for hospitality marketing. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 28, 1510–1534.
  6. Belkahla, W., & Triki, A. (2011). Customer knowledge enabled innovation capability: Proposing a measurement scale. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(4), 648–674.
  7. Berezina, K., Bilgihan, A., Cobanoglu, C., & Okumus, F. (2016). Understanding satisfied and dissatisfied hotel customers: text mining of online hotel reviews. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 25(1), 1-24.
  8. Bergen, M., Dutta, S. and Walker, O.J. (1992). Agency relationships in marketing: a review of the implications and applications of agency and related theories. The Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 1-24.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Business Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 27, 2022

Submission Date

November 17, 2021

Acceptance Date

May 12, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 7 Number: 1

APA
Yıldırım, C. (2022). CLASSIFYING ONLINE CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS: A MULTIAGENT PERSPECTIVE. Journal of Research in Business, 7(1), 158-179. https://doi.org/10.54452/jrb.1024839
AMA
1.Yıldırım C. CLASSIFYING ONLINE CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS: A MULTIAGENT PERSPECTIVE. JRB. 2022;7(1):158-179. doi:10.54452/jrb.1024839
Chicago
Yıldırım, Cansu. 2022. “CLASSIFYING ONLINE CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS: A MULTIAGENT PERSPECTIVE”. Journal of Research in Business 7 (1): 158-79. https://doi.org/10.54452/jrb.1024839.
EndNote
Yıldırım C (June 1, 2022) CLASSIFYING ONLINE CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS: A MULTIAGENT PERSPECTIVE. Journal of Research in Business 7 1 158–179.
IEEE
[1]C. Yıldırım, “CLASSIFYING ONLINE CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS: A MULTIAGENT PERSPECTIVE”, JRB, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 158–179, June 2022, doi: 10.54452/jrb.1024839.
ISNAD
Yıldırım, Cansu. “CLASSIFYING ONLINE CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS: A MULTIAGENT PERSPECTIVE”. Journal of Research in Business 7/1 (June 1, 2022): 158-179. https://doi.org/10.54452/jrb.1024839.
JAMA
1.Yıldırım C. CLASSIFYING ONLINE CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS: A MULTIAGENT PERSPECTIVE. JRB. 2022;7:158–179.
MLA
Yıldırım, Cansu. “CLASSIFYING ONLINE CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS: A MULTIAGENT PERSPECTIVE”. Journal of Research in Business, vol. 7, no. 1, June 2022, pp. 158-79, doi:10.54452/jrb.1024839.
Vancouver
1.Cansu Yıldırım. CLASSIFYING ONLINE CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS: A MULTIAGENT PERSPECTIVE. JRB. 2022 Jun. 1;7(1):158-79. doi:10.54452/jrb.1024839