Research Article

THE MODERATING ROLE OF GENERAL ATTITUDE TOWARDS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION

Volume: 9 Number: 2 December 6, 2024
TR EN

THE MODERATING ROLE OF GENERAL ATTITUDE TOWARDS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION

Abstract

This study focuses on understanding the effects of digital transformation processes in the business world on employee satisfaction. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the general attitude towards artificial intelligence plays a moderating role in the effect of digital transformation on employee satisfaction. At the same time, the study was also reinforced and elaborated with demographic questions directed to the employees. The population of the study consists of private enterprises operating in the retail sector in Istanbul. The sample is the decision-making white- collar (N= 522) current employees working in these retail sectors. SPSS 24.0 statistical package programe was used to analyze the data. Normality test was performed to determine whether the data set was suitable for parametric tests. Kurtosis and skewness values were used to evaluate normality. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to determine the direction and severity of the relationship between the variables. Moderating analysis was performed to determine how the relationship between an independent variable and a dependent variable is affectedy a third variable. According to the results obtained from the study, there are quite high and significant correlations between digital transformation and other variables in the correlation analysis. According to the moderating effect analysis, it was observed that the general attitude towards artificial intelligence did not moderate the effect of digital transformation on the variables. In demographic variables, significant differences are observed in all variables and sub-dimensions.

Keywords

References

  1. Agustina, R., Yusuf, M., Sutiyan, O. S. J., Ardianto, R., & Norvadewi, N. (2024). Employee performance mediated quality of work life relationship satisfaction on the job and organizational commitment. Jurnal Darma Agung, 30(2), 589-605.
  2. Ahmad, S. F., Han, H., Alam, M. M., Rehmat, M., Irshad, M., Arraño-Muñoz, M., & Ariza-Montes, A. (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence on human loss in decision making, laziness and safety in education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-14.
  3. Akter, S., Michael, K., Uddin, M. R., McCarthy, G., & Rahman, M. (2022). Transforming business using digital innovations: the application of ai, blockchain, cloud and data analytics. Annals of Operations Research, 308(1), 7-39.
  4. Ali, B. J., & Anwar, G. (2021). An empirical study of employees’ motivation and its influence job satisfaction. International Journal of Engineering, Business and Management, 5(2), 21-30.
  5. Alsawafi, A., Lemke, F., & Yang, Y. (2021). The impacts of internal quality management relations on the triple bottom line: a dynamic capability perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 232, 107927.
  6. Bankins, S., & Formosa, P. (2023). The ethical implications of artificial intelligence (ai) for meaningful work. Journal of Business Ethics, 185, 1-16.
  7. Chen, H., Chiang, R. H., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS quarterly, 36(4), 1165-1188.
  8. Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive süite. Journal of management, 23(3), 239-290.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Business Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 6, 2024

Submission Date

December 18, 2023

Acceptance Date

July 14, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 9 Number: 2

APA
Yazıcı, A. M., & Sivaslıoğlu, F. (2024). THE MODERATING ROLE OF GENERAL ATTITUDE TOWARDS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION. Journal of Research in Business, 9(2), 335-364. https://doi.org/10.54452/jrb.1406459
AMA
1.Yazıcı AM, Sivaslıoğlu F. THE MODERATING ROLE OF GENERAL ATTITUDE TOWARDS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION. JRB. 2024;9(2):335-364. doi:10.54452/jrb.1406459
Chicago
Yazıcı, Ayşe Meriç, and Filiz Sivaslıoğlu. 2024. “THE MODERATING ROLE OF GENERAL ATTITUDE TOWARDS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION”. Journal of Research in Business 9 (2): 335-64. https://doi.org/10.54452/jrb.1406459.
EndNote
Yazıcı AM, Sivaslıoğlu F (December 1, 2024) THE MODERATING ROLE OF GENERAL ATTITUDE TOWARDS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION. Journal of Research in Business 9 2 335–364.
IEEE
[1]A. M. Yazıcı and F. Sivaslıoğlu, “THE MODERATING ROLE OF GENERAL ATTITUDE TOWARDS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION”, JRB, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 335–364, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.54452/jrb.1406459.
ISNAD
Yazıcı, Ayşe Meriç - Sivaslıoğlu, Filiz. “THE MODERATING ROLE OF GENERAL ATTITUDE TOWARDS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION”. Journal of Research in Business 9/2 (December 1, 2024): 335-364. https://doi.org/10.54452/jrb.1406459.
JAMA
1.Yazıcı AM, Sivaslıoğlu F. THE MODERATING ROLE OF GENERAL ATTITUDE TOWARDS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION. JRB. 2024;9:335–364.
MLA
Yazıcı, Ayşe Meriç, and Filiz Sivaslıoğlu. “THE MODERATING ROLE OF GENERAL ATTITUDE TOWARDS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION”. Journal of Research in Business, vol. 9, no. 2, Dec. 2024, pp. 335-64, doi:10.54452/jrb.1406459.
Vancouver
1.Ayşe Meriç Yazıcı, Filiz Sivaslıoğlu. THE MODERATING ROLE OF GENERAL ATTITUDE TOWARDS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION. JRB. 2024 Dec. 1;9(2):335-64. doi:10.54452/jrb.1406459

Cited By