BibTex RIS Cite

Comparative study of harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy versus conventional (Milligan and Morgan) haemorrhoidectomy

Year 2018, Volume: 11 Issue: 1, 7 - 12, 01.01.2018

Abstract

Background: Haemorrhoids are dilated veins occurring in relation to the anus. There are various treatment modalities for haemorrhoids and among them surgical treatment is considered to be most effective one. Material and Methods: The aim of our study was to compare harmonic scalpel (HS) haemorrhoidectomy with conventional (Miligan and Morgan, MM) in terms of various intraoperative and postoperative factors for the treatment of grade III and IV haemorrhoids. Results: In our case study of 25 patients (HS group) average time taken was 17.68 ± 2.84 minutes, while it was 28.44 ±3.69 minutes in control (MM) group. The mean blood loss was 8.96 ± 2.15 ml, 31.72 ± 3.28 ml in the case and control group respectively. Postoperative pain with VAS in HS group on the first postoperative day was 5.92 ± 0.72, while it was 8.52 ± 0 in the MM group. The dose of analgesia was less in HS group. The postoperative wound site soakage was less in HS study, early ambulation and return to normal work was faster in case study group. Conclusion: HS haemorrhoidectomy is a simple, bloodless, safe and effective procedure in terms of blood loss, postoperative pain early return to routine work because of less lateral thermal injury

Klasik (Miligan ve Morgan) hemoroidektomi ile harmonik skalpel ile yapılan hemoroidektomi olgularımızın karşılaştırılması

Year 2018, Volume: 11 Issue: 1, 7 - 12, 01.01.2018

Abstract

Hemoroid anal bölgedeki venşerin variköz genişlemesidir. Tedavi amacıyla uygulanan çok sayıda yöntem
mevcuttur.
Burada, grade 3 ve 4 hemoroidlerde uygulanan klasik yöntem (MM grup) ve harmonik skalpel (HS
grup) ile yapılan hemoroidektomilerde intraoperatif ve postoperatif veriler mukayese edilmiştir.
Çalışmaya alınan 25 hastada HS ile ameliyat süresi 17.68 ± 2.84 dk, klasik yöntemle (MM) ameliyat
edilen kontrol grubunda ise 28.44 ±3.69 dk olarak saptanmıştır. Ortalama kan kaybı HS grubunda 8.96 ± 2.15
ml, klasik MM grubunda ise 31.72 ± 3.28 ml olarak saptanmıştır. Ağrı durumunu belirlemede kullanılan VAS
skalası ile ilk günkü değerler HS grubunda 5.92 ± 0.72, MM grubunda ise 8.52 ± 0 olarak saptanmıştır. Verilen
analjezik miktarı hS grubunda daha azdır. Ameliyat sonrası yara yerinde ıslanma HS grubunda daha az, ambulasyon
ve işe dönüş de HS grıubunda daha kısa olarak saptanmıştır.
Sonuç olarak; HS ile hemoroidektomi basit, kansız, güvenli ve efektif olarak yapılabilecek bir prosedürdür

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA77ZN66FR
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Tariq Ahmed Mala This is me

Shahid Amin Malla This is me

Ajaz Ahmad Shah This is me

Maria Kapoor This is me

Ved Bushan Gupta This is me

Publication Date January 1, 2018
Submission Date January 1, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 11 Issue: 1

Cite

Vancouver Mala TA, Malla SA, Shah AA, Kapoor M, Gupta VB. Comparative study of harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy versus conventional (Milligan and Morgan) haemorrhoidectomy. JSurgArts. 2018;11(1):7-12.

Journal of Surgical Arts (Cerrahi Sanatlar Dergisi, ISSN:1308-0709) is indexed with, or included in, the following;  OJS, DOAJ, CROSSREF, EBSCO Host, Google Scholar, CiteFactor, MIAR Index, EuroPub Database, CABELLS, Dergipark (TUBİTAK), Türkiye Citation Index, Sobiad, Asos Index, İdeal Index, and Akademik Index.

Note: The Journal of Surgical Arts is within the scope of the journals scanned by the international indexes (EBSCO, DOAJ,..) defined by "Interuniversity Board" (YÖK, Türkiye).

Submission: When submitting an article, you will be directed to DergiPark (Journal of Surgical Arts » Home (dergipark.org.tr), which is a Hosting and Manuscript tracking service provider. You will be able to log in easily with the username and password you set.