Ameliyat sonrası yoksulluk; Cerrahinin gizli ikilemi

Year 2025, Volume: 18 Issue: 2, 42 - 44, 15.07.2025

Waleed Ahmad , Yumna Shariff , Salik Mahmood , Ahmed Mueed

Abstract

Ameliyat sonrası yoksulluk, cerrahi müdahalelerden sonra hastaların yaşadığı mali zorlukları tanımla-yan bir terim olarak tam olarak anlaşılamamış olsa da, düşük ve orta gelirli ülkelerde (DMOÜ) cerrahi bakımın ciddi bir sonucudur. Ameliyat, hayat kurtarıcı olsa da, çoğunlukla aileleri ekonomik olarak zor durumda bıra-kan felaket düzeyinde cepten harcamalara neden olur.
Bu yazı, DMOÜ'lerde cerrahi planlamanın mali gelirlerindeki denetimsizlik sorunlarını ele almaktadır. Uganda, Sierra Leone ve Tanzanya'da elde edilen verilere dayanarak, ulaşım, kaybedilen ücretler, rehabilitas-yon ve daha uzun süreli hastane kalışlarının, kamuya açık/sübvansiyonlu bir tesiste tedavi edilmiş olsalar bile hastalar tarafından karşılandığını ve bunun da tıbbi yoksullaşmalarına katkıda bulunduğunu gösteriyoruz. Bu tür ekonomik artçı sarsıntılar kadınlar tarafından yoğun bir şekilde hissedilmekte ve nesiller arası yoksulluk döngüsünü derinleştirmektedir. Dünya, Evrensel Sağlık Kapsamını (UHC) teşvik etmiş olsa da, ameliyat sonrası rehabilitasyon tedavisi ve finansal risk teminatı çoğu cerrahi poliçede açıkça eksiktir.

Keywords

Ameliyat sonrası yoksulluk, mali yoksunluk, sistemik ihmal

Postoperative poverty; The hidden surgical dilemma

Abstract

A term describing the financial difficulty experienced by sick people after surgical procedures, postope-rative poverty, remains poorly understood but it is a severe outcome of surgical care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Surgery, though life-saving, mostly causes catastrophic out-of-pocket spending which puts families in a bad economic position.
This editorial addresses the maladies of oversight in the financial incomes of surgical planning in LMICs. On the basis of the data obtained in Uganda, Sierra Leone, and Tanzania, we demonstrate that trans-portation, lost wages, rehabilitation, and longer hospital stays are paid by the patients, even in case they have been treated in a publicly accessible/subsidized facility, which contributes to their medical impoverishment. Such economic aftershocks are highly felt by women and entrench the cycle of intergenerational poverty. Even though the world has promoted Universal Health Coverage (UHC), postoperative rehabilitative treatment and financial risk coverage are glaringly missing in most surgical policies.
The traditional focus on surgical volume at the expense of financial safety has to be changed. We call for the inclusion of post-surgery care and financial protections into the basic surgical service package and UHC programs. Policymakers should understand that recovery following surgery is not clinical but it is economic as well.

Keywords

Postoperative Poverty, Financial Fallout Post-Surgery, Global Surgery, Systemic Neglect

Ethical Statement

This editorial is based entirely on the authors' interpretation of published literature and does not involve any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author. Therefore, ethical approval and informed consent were not required

References

• 1. Phull M, Grimes CE, Kamara TB, Wurie H, Leather AJ, Davies J. What is the financial burden to patients of accessing surgical care in Sierra Leone? A cross-sectional survey of catastrophic and impoverishing expenditure. BMJ open. 2021;11(3):e039049.
• 2. Nwanna–Nzewunwa O, Oke R, Agwang E, Ajiko MM, Yoon C, Carvalho M, et al. The societal cost and economic impact of surgical care on patients’ households in rural Uganda; a mixed method study. BMC health services research. 2021;21(1):568.
• 3. Holmer H, Lantz A, Kunjumen T, Finlayson S, Hoyler M, Siyam A, et al. Global distribution of surgeons, anaesthesiologists, and obstetricians. The Lancet Global Health. 2015;3:S9-.
• 4. Kieny MP, Bekedam H, Dovlo D, Fitzgerald J, Habicht J, Harrison G, Kluge H, Lin V, Menab-de N, Mirza Z, Siddiqi S. Strengthening health systems for universal health coverage and sustainable development. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2017;95(7):537.
• 5. Shrime MG, Dare AJ, Alkire BC, O'Neill K, Meara JG. Catastrophic expenditure to pay for surgery worldwide: a modelling study. The Lancet Glo-bal Health. 2015;3:S38-44.
• 6. Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L, Alkire BC, Alonso N, Ameh EA, et al. Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. The Lancet. 2015;386(9993):569-624.
• 7. Phull M, Grimes CE, Kamara TB, Wurie H, Leat-her AJM, Davies J. What is the financial burden to patients of accessing surgical care in Sierra Leone? A cross-sectional survey of catastrophic and impoverishing expenditure. BMJ Open. 2021;11(3):e039049.
• 8. Obayemi JE, Card EB, Shirima O, Premkumar A, Massawe H, Sheth NP. Hospitalized for poverty: orthopaedic discharge delays due to financial hardship in a tertiary hospital in Northern Tanzania. Glob Health Res Policy. 2022;7(1):31.
• 9. Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, Jordan K, Leslie HH, Roder-DeWan S, et al. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. The Lancet Global Health. 2018;6(11):e1196-252.
• 10. Yanful B, Kirubarajan A, Bhatia D, et al. Quality of care in the context of universal health coverage: a scoping review. Health Res Policy Syst. 2023;21:21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00957-5
• 11. Yokobori Y, Kiyohara H, Mulati N, Lwin KS, Bao TQQ, Aung MN, et al. Roles of Social Protection to Promote Health Service Coverage among Vulnerable People toward Achieving Universal Health Coverage: A Literature Review of International Organizations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(9):5754.
• 12. Pigeolet M, Degu S, Faria I, et al. Universal health coverage: a commitment to essential surgical, obstetric, and anesthesia care, World Health Summit 2021(PD 20). BMC Proc. 2023;17(Suppl 6):4.
• 13. Rawlings L B, Rubio G M. Evaluating the impact of conditional cash transfer programs: Lessons from Latin America. The World Bank Research Observer. 2005;20 (1):1–29.