Research Article

Procrastinating Exercise or Staying in the Flow? The Relationship Between Psychological Flow and Exercise Procrastination in Sports Science Students

Volume: 7 Number: 3 September 30, 2025

Procrastinating Exercise or Staying in the Flow? The Relationship Between Psychological Flow and Exercise Procrastination in Sports Science Students

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between psychological flow experiences and exer-cise procrastination among university students majoring in sports science. Using a quan-titative research design and survey model, data were collected from 279 students (163 males and 116 females), as determined via G*Power analysis. The Psychological Flow Scale and Exercise Procrastination Scale were employed, and data were analyzed using SPSS 25. Statistical methods included normality tests, descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANO-VA/Welch tests, Pearson correlation, and simple linear regression analyses. Findings showed that male students reported significantly higher scores in all dimensions of psy-chological flow compared to females, while females demonstrated higher levels of exercise procrastination. Additionally, students from low-income backgrounds scored higher in the self-transcendence and effortless control subdimensions of psychological flow. A sta-tistically significant negative correlation was found between psychological flow and exer-cise procrastination, indicating that higher levels of flow are associated with reduced pro-crastination. Regression analysis revealed that psychological flow accounted for approx-imately 7% of the variance in exercise procrastination. These results suggest that psycho-logical flow plays a protective role against exercise procrastination, and this effect varies by gender and income level. Enhancing flow experiences may be a beneficial strategy for promoting regular exercise behavior among sports science students, particularly males and those from low-income backgrounds.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

The research data was collected in accordance with the official approval (Protocol No: 06/13) granted by the Health and Sports Sciences Ethics Committee of Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University on June 27, 2025. Informed consent was obtained from the participants, indicating that they voluntarily participated in the research and consented to the use of their data for scientific pur-poses. Participants were clearly informed that they had the right to withdraw from the study at any time during the research process. All processes implemented throughout the research were conducted in full compliance with the ethical principles estab-lished in the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its subsequent updates. Data were obtained through face-to-face interviews with volunteer students enrolled in sports science faculties at various universities and through written consent forms.

References

  1. Adams, J., & White, M. (2005). Why don't stage-based activity promotion interventions work? Health Education Research, 20(2), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg105
  2. Ayhan, C., & Eskiler, E. (2024). The relationship between leisure attitude and happiness: The mediating effect of recreational flow experience. International Journal of Recreation and Sports Science, 8(1), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.46463/ijrss.1504810
  3. Başer, S., & Uslu, T. (2023). Rekreasyonel etkinlikler ve elektronik eğlence yönetimi bağlamında psikolojik sermaye ve akış: Espor ve tekno spor oyuncuları üzerine bir araştırma. Fenerbahçe Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 32–72.
  4. Bayram, A., Yalcin, I., Sahin, E., Ekinci, N. E., Talaghir, L. G., & Iconomescu, T. M. (2025). The role of recreational flow experience and well-being on re-participation intention: Recreational sport participants. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1574337. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1574337
  5. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2020). Araştırma yöntemleri: Desen ve analiz (A. Aypay, Ed. ve Çev.). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  6. Cohen, S., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Routledge.
  7. Csikszentmihályi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
  8. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Sport and Exercise Psychology , Sports Science and Exercise (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 30, 2025

Submission Date

July 28, 2025

Acceptance Date

September 8, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 7 Number: 3

APA
Seçer, E., & Kuleli, H. (2025). Procrastinating Exercise or Staying in the Flow? The Relationship Between Psychological Flow and Exercise Procrastination in Sports Science Students. Journal of Sport for All and Recreation, 7(3), 557-566. https://doi.org/10.56639/jsar.1752575

Creative Commons Lisansı

Articles published by Journal Sports for All and Recreation is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License.