Assessing the potentials of low impact materials for low energy housing provision in Nigeria

Abstract

Due to high energy consumption by building and a resultant increasing cost, it is imperative that a solution be sought after with the aim of achieving low energy housing delivery. This study aimed at assessing the availability, knowledge and importance of low impact building materials in the delivery of low energy housing. Low impact materials suitable for low energy housing delivery and how they are locally obtained in the study areas were identified, occupants’ preference in the selection of low impact construction material for housing delivery were examined and the application of low impact material for low energy housing delivery in the study area were determined. The research focused mainly on three states in north central Nigeria namely; Niger, Kogi and FCT Abuja. Quantitative research method was used and weighted mean of responses were ranked in an ordinal manner from 236 respondents. The respondents were not aware of low impact materials as they were only aware and accustomed to using sandcrete blocks and burnt clay bricks. The outcome of the correlation established that the most preferred building material is the sandcrete block, showing a positive relationship with durability and structural performance as the influencers.

Keywords

• Low impact materials
• low energy housing delivery
• sandcrete blocks

References

1. [1] Gilkinson, N., & Sexton, M. (2007). Delivering Sus- tainable Homes; meeting requirement: a research agenda. 35th IAHS World Congress on Housing Sci- ence, (pp. 4-7). Melbourne, Australia.
2. [2] Onyike, J. (2007). An assessment of affordability of housing by public servants in Owerri, Nigeria, Jour- nal of Land Use and Development Studies. 8, [On- line ahead of print]
3. [3] Makinde, O.O. (2014). Housing delivery system, need and demand. Environmental Development Sus- tainability, 49–69. [CrossRef]
4. [4] Yomi, M.A. (2012). Sustainable housing provision: preference for the use of interlocking mansory in housing delivery in Nigeria. Architecture Research, 81–86. [CrossRef ]
5. [5] Bruce, T. (2012). Delivering a low-energy building; making quality a commonplace. Norwich, UK: Build With Care. Low Carbon Construction, Innovation & Autumn 2010.
6. [6] Dayaratne, R. (2011). Reinventing traditional tech- nologies for sustainability: contemporary earth ar- chitecture of Sri. Journal of Green Building, 22–23. [CrossRef ]
7. [7] Arman. H, Heather, C., & Ali, C. (2015). Environ- mental impacts and embodied energy of construc- tion methods and materials in low-income tropical housing. Sustainability, 7, 7866–7883. [CrossRef]
8. [8] Atanda, J. (2015). Environmental impacts of bam- boo as a substitute constructional material in Nige- ria. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 3, 33–39. [CrossRef ]

9. [9] Praseeda, K.I., Reddy, B.V.V., & Mani, M. (2016). Embodied and operational energy of urban residen- tial buildings in India. Energy Buildings, 110, 211– 219. [CrossRef ]
10. [10] Dixit, M.K. (2017a). Life cycle embodied energy anal- ysis of residential buildings: A review of literature to investigate embodied energy parameters. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev, 79, 390–413. [CrossRef ]
11. [11] Dixit, M.K. (2017b). Embodied energy analysis of building materials: An improved IO-based hybrid method using sectoral disaggregation. Energy, 124, 46–58. [CrossRef ]
12. [12] Nizam, R.S., Zhang, C., Tian, L. (2018), A BIM based tool for assessing embodied energy for build- ings. Energy Buildings, 170, 1–14. [CrossRef]
13. [13] Lotteau, M., Loubet, P., & Sonnemann, G. (2017). An analysis to understand how the shape of a con- crete residential building influences its embodied energy and embodied carbon. Energy Buildings, 154,1–11. [CrossRef ]
14. [14] Azari, R., & Abbasabadi, N. (2018). Embodied en- ergy of buildings: A review of data, methods, chal- lenges, and research trends. Energy Buildings, 168, 225–235. [CrossRef ]
15. [15] Dixit, M.K. Singh, S. (2018). Embodied energy analysis of higher education buildings using an in- put-output-based hybrid method. Energy Buildings, 161, 41–54. [CrossRef]
16. [16] Chen, T., Burnett, J., & Chau, C. (2000). Analy- sis of embodied use in the residential building of Honkong. Energy, 24(4), pp. 323–340. [CrossRef]
17. [17] Ezema, I., Opoko, A., & Oluwatayo, A., 2016, De-car- bonizing the Nigerian housing sector: The role of life cycle CO2 assessment. International Journal of Applied Environmental Sciences, 11(1), 325–349. [CrossRef ]
18. [18] Fay, R., Treloar., G., & Iyer-Raniga, U. (2000). Life Cycle Energy Analysis of Buildings: a case study. Building, Research and Information, 28(1), 31–41. [CrossRef ]
19. [19] Jennings, M., Hirst N., & Gambhir A., (2011), Re- duction of carbon dioxide emissions in the global building sector to 2050. Grantham Institute for Cli- mate Change Report GR. 3, Imperial College, Lon- don, UK.
20. [20] Mohad, H.A., Liman, A.S, Roshida, B.A.M. (2018). Quantifying the embodied carbon of a low energy alternative method of construction (AMC) house in Nigeria. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 643–648.
21. [21] Arocho, I., Rasdorf W., & Hummer, J., (2014). Meth- odology to forecast the emissions from construction equipment for a transportation construction project. Construction Research Congress 2014, 19th-21st May, Atlanta. [CrossRef]
22. [22] Ezema, I.C., Olotuah A.O., & Fagbenle O.I. (2016). Estimating embodied energy in residential build- ings in a nigerian context. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 44140–44149.
23. [23] Pickvance, C.G. (2001). Four varieties of compara- tive analysis. Journal of Housing and the Built Envi- ronment, 16, 7–28. [CrossRef]
24. [24] Baltar, F., & Brunet, I. (2012). Social research 2.0: virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook. Internet Res 22, 57–74. [CrossRef]
25. [25] Hasan, M., & Kerr, R.M. (2003). The relationship between total quality management practices and or- ganisational performance in service organisations. The TQM Magazine, 15(4), 286–291. [CrossRef]
26. [26] Shuttleworth, M. (2009). Construct Validity – Does the Concept Match the Specific Measurement? Ex- plorable.com: https://explorable.com/construct-va- lidity. Accessed on Dec 23, 2021.
27. [27] Saunders, M.N.K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research Methods for Business Students (7th ed.). Pearson.
28. [28] Scherbaum, C.A., & Shockley, K.M. (2015). Analys- ing Quantitative Data for Business and Management Students (Mastering Business Research Methods) (1st ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd. [CrossRef]
29. [29] Arceňo, R.A. (2018). Motivations and expectations of graduate students of the college of advanced ed- ucation (CAED). PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 239–256. [CrossRef]
30. [30] Akande, O.K., Olagunju, R.E., Aremu, S.C., & Ogun- depo, E.A. (2018). Exploring factors influencing of project management success in public building proj- ects in Nigeria. YBL Journal of Built Environment, 6(1), 51. [CrossRef]
31. [31] Woubishet, Z.T., & Kassahun A.A. (2019). Embod- ied energy and CO2 emissions ofwidely used build- ing materials: the ethiopian context. Buildings, 1–15.
32. [32] Anon (2015). http://dreamfundesign.com/restau- rant-design/bamboo-for-interior-designing-of-en- vironmentally-friendly-restaurant/attachment/ bamboorestaurant-interior-designing2. Accessedon Dec 23, 2021.
33. [33] Abraham, T., & Albert, A. (2013). Sustainable Hous- ing Supply in Nigeria Through the Use of Indige- nous and Composite Building Materials. Civil and Environmental Research, 3(1), 79–85.
34. [34] Beneyam, N.F., Fadilu S.J., & Natinael, B.T. (2021). [38] Study on the Suitability of Soils in Ilu Aba Bora Zone for Hydraform Block Production for Low-Cost Construction. Journal of Building Material Science, 3(1), 37–42. [CrossRef]
35. [35] Klaus, D., (2002). Bamboo as a building Material, In: IL31 Bambus, Karl Kramer, Verlag, Stuttgart, 1992.
36. [36] Norhasliya, M.D., Norazman, M.N, Mohammed, A.Y, Azrul, A.M.A., & Amalina, A.S (2017). The Physical and Mechanical Properties of Treated and Untreated Gigantochloa Scortechinii Bamboo, In- ternational Conference on Engineering and Tech- nology (IntCET 2017) AIP Conference Proceedings 1930, 020016.
37. [37] Musa, Y.P., Ajayi, E.S., & Alabadan, B.A. (2019) Ef- fect of different mud brick moulds and mortar on durability of plaster materials of buildings. Bayero Journal of Engineering and Technology (Bjet), 14(2), 109–122.
38. [38] Udomiaye, E., Chukwuali, B.C., & Kalu C.K. (2020). Life cycle energy assessment (lcea) approach: a prospect for sustainable architecture in developing Countries. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 8(5), 777–791. [CrossRef]
39. [39] Ikechukwu, O., & Iwuagwu, B.U. (2016). Tradition- al building materials as a sustainable resource and material for low-cost housing in nigeria advantages, challenges and the way forward. International Jour- nal of Research in Chemical, Metallurgical and Civil Engineering, 3(2), 247–252. [CrossRef]