Review Article

FRP Strengthening of RC Structures: Sustainable, Environmental and Structural Evaluations

Volume: 7 Number: 4 December 30, 2022
EN

FRP Strengthening of RC Structures: Sustainable, Environmental and Structural Evaluations

Abstract

Strengthening and rehabilitation have been widely implemented for many years to extend the service life of reinforced concrete structures. The paper begins with a comprehensive review of the fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) utilization on strengthening particularly over the traditional materials formerly used in practice with respect to materials, manufacturing, operation, construction, and maintenance phases, as well as the engineering and environmental performance of such materials. Carbon and Glass FRP, the most frequently used strengthening materials, are particularly designated in the study and are employed to conduct an environmental performance evaluation using the previously published data in the literature. The paper then investigates the punching shear strength of flat slab-column connections strengthened with externally bonded FRP by means of a nominated database comprising 57 number of data points harvested from the recent literature. The database is used in the evaluation of the test data with TS 500 code equations and the recent modification of Chen and Li. The study enabled the key factors affecting the punching shear strength of such connections to be emphasized and highlighted the fact that the TS 500 code equations fall conservative in predicting the punching shear strength of slab-column connections strengthed with FRP. The study is novel as it provides a comprehensive review of the FRP as a strengthening material with regards to environmental sustainability and also provides an insight into the structural implications of this material by evaluating the current TS 500 code provisions and recent modifications.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Ersoy U., & Tankut T. (1992). Current research at METU on repair and strengthening of R/C structures. Technical University of Istanbul Bulletin, 45(1-3), 209–240.
  2. [2] Banu, D., & Taranu, N. (2010). Traditional solutions for strengthening reinforced concrete slabs. Bulletin of the Polytechnic Institute of Jassy, 3(3), 54–62.
  3. [3] Yooprasertchai, E., Piamkulvanit, M., Srithong, C., Sukcharoen, T., & Sahamitmongkol, R. (2022). A comparison of punching shear strengthening of RC flat plates with FRP bars and steel bolts. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 16, Article e00828. [CrossRef]
  4. [4] Saadatmanesh, H. (1997). Extending service life of concrete and masonry structures with fiber composites. Construction and Building Materials, 11(5-6), 327–335. [CrossRef]
  5. [5] Gkournelos, P. D., Triantafillou, T. C., & Bournas, D. A. (2021). Seismic upgrading of existing reinforced concrete buildings: A state-of-the-art review. Engineering Structures, 240, Article 112273. [CrossRef]
  6. [6] Heiza, K., Nabil, A., Meleka, N., & Tayel, M. (2014). State-of-the art review: Strengthening of reinforced concrete structures–different strengthening techniques. In Sixth International Conference on Na-no-Technology in Construction, 6, 12–24.
  7. [7] Naser, M. Z., Hawileh, R. A., & Abdalla, J. A. (2019). Fiber-reinforced polymer composites in strengthening reinforced concrete structures: A critical review. Engineering Structures, 198, Article 109542. [CrossRef]
  8. [8] Yuhazri, M. Y., Zulfikar, A. J., & Ginting, A. (2020).Fiber reinforced polymer composite as a strengthening of concrete structures: A Review. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2ndInternational Conference on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (ICI&ME 2020), 1003(1), Article012135. [CrossRef]

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Civil Engineering

Journal Section

Review Article

Authors

Ali Cem Yağar *
0000-0001-7061-4380
Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti

Ceren İnce
0000-0002-5210-0228
Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti

Shahram Derogar This is me
0000-0003-1305-0712
United Kingdom

Publication Date

December 30, 2022

Submission Date

November 28, 2022

Acceptance Date

December 19, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 7 Number: 4

APA
Yağar, A. C., İnce, C., & Derogar, S. (2022). FRP Strengthening of RC Structures: Sustainable, Environmental and Structural Evaluations. Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, 7(4), 358-374. https://doi.org/10.47481/jscmt.1211086
AMA
1.Yağar AC, İnce C, Derogar S. FRP Strengthening of RC Structures: Sustainable, Environmental and Structural Evaluations. JSCMT. 2022;7(4):358-374. doi:10.47481/jscmt.1211086
Chicago
Yağar, Ali Cem, Ceren İnce, and Shahram Derogar. 2022. “FRP Strengthening of RC Structures: Sustainable, Environmental and Structural Evaluations”. Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies 7 (4): 358-74. https://doi.org/10.47481/jscmt.1211086.
EndNote
Yağar AC, İnce C, Derogar S (December 1, 2022) FRP Strengthening of RC Structures: Sustainable, Environmental and Structural Evaluations. Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies 7 4 358–374.
IEEE
[1]A. C. Yağar, C. İnce, and S. Derogar, “FRP Strengthening of RC Structures: Sustainable, Environmental and Structural Evaluations”, JSCMT, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 358–374, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.47481/jscmt.1211086.
ISNAD
Yağar, Ali Cem - İnce, Ceren - Derogar, Shahram. “FRP Strengthening of RC Structures: Sustainable, Environmental and Structural Evaluations”. Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies 7/4 (December 1, 2022): 358-374. https://doi.org/10.47481/jscmt.1211086.
JAMA
1.Yağar AC, İnce C, Derogar S. FRP Strengthening of RC Structures: Sustainable, Environmental and Structural Evaluations. JSCMT. 2022;7:358–374.
MLA
Yağar, Ali Cem, et al. “FRP Strengthening of RC Structures: Sustainable, Environmental and Structural Evaluations”. Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, vol. 7, no. 4, Dec. 2022, pp. 358-74, doi:10.47481/jscmt.1211086.
Vancouver
1.Ali Cem Yağar, Ceren İnce, Shahram Derogar. FRP Strengthening of RC Structures: Sustainable, Environmental and Structural Evaluations. JSCMT. 2022 Dec. 1;7(4):358-74. doi:10.47481/jscmt.1211086

Cited By