Research Article

Analyzing the knowledge and attitudes of architects in Türkiye on circular economy in the built environment

Volume: 10 Number: 1 March 29, 2025
EN

Analyzing the knowledge and attitudes of architects in Türkiye on circular economy in the built environment

Abstract

The circular economy (CE) model offers solutions to prevent environmental and ecological degradation, aiming for sustainability. This study aims to analyze CE awareness among ar- chitects in Türkiye. A descriptive research approach was conducted using a structured survey to determine architects' awareness of CE principles and strategies in the built environment. Based on the survey data, explanatory research was undertaken to explore the relationships between variables, test the proposed hypotheses, and provide more precise insights. The study found that architects in Türkiye have a low level of knowledge about CE but demonstrate a high level of positive attitude towards CE. The knowledge gap is particularly pronounced among architects with undergraduate education. Furthermore, as architects' knowledge of CE increases, their attitude toward CE becomes more positive. The study also revealed that architects' work experience or their area of practice in architecture significantly influences their CE awareness. These findings suggest that the understanding of CE among architects in Türkiye could be substantially improved, particularly if architects with a bachelor's degree enhance their knowledge of CE. Universities, local authorities, NGOs, and other construction professionals can use this study's results to assess the current state of architects' CE awareness. The study sheds light on an underexplored area in the construction industry in Türkiye. It con- tributes to the CE literature in Türkiye by providing comprehensive information on architects' awareness of CE in the built environment.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Ecorys. (2014). Resource efficiency in the building sector. Copenhagen Resource Institute.
  2. 2. Krausmann, F., Wiedenhofer, D., Lauk, C., Haas, W., Tanikawa, H., Fishman, T., & Haberl, H.(2017). Global socioeconomic material stocks rise 23-fold over the 20th century and require half of annual resource use. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 114, 1880–1885. [CrossRef]
  3. 3. Thelen, D., van Acoleyen, M., Huurman, W., Thomas, T., van Brunschot, C., Edgerton, B., & Kubbinga, B. (2018). Scaling the circular built environment. Arcadis; Circle Economy.
  4. 4. Norouzi, M., Chafer, M., Cabeza, L. F., Jimenez, L., & Boer, D. (2021). Circular economy in the building and construction sector: A scientific evolution analysis. J Build Eng, 44, 102704. [CrossRef]
  5. 5. Murray, K., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. J Bus Ethics, 140, 369–380. [CrossRef]
  6. 6. Avdiushchenko, A. (2018). Toward a circular economy regional monitoring framework for European regions: A conceptual approach. Sustainability, 10, 4398. [CrossRef]
  7. 7. Ranta, V., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Ritala, P., & Makinen, S. J. (2018). Exploring institutional drivers and barriers of the circular economy: A cross-regional comparison of China, the US, and Europe. Resour Conserv Recycl, 135, 70–82. [CrossRef]
  8. 8. Anastasiades, K., Blom, J., Buyle, M., & Audenaert, A. (2020). Translating the circular economy to bridge construction: Lessons learned from a critical literature review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 117, 109522. [CrossRef]

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Construction Materials

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 29, 2025

Submission Date

January 9, 2025

Acceptance Date

March 4, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 10 Number: 1

APA
Deniz, Ö. Ş., & Oğuz, Z. M. (2025). Analyzing the knowledge and attitudes of architects in Türkiye on circular economy in the built environment. Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, 10(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.47481/jscmt.1667782