Prediction of Compressive Strength of Calcined Clay Based Cement Mortars Using Support Vector Machine and Artificial Neural Network Techniques

Year 2020, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 392 - 398, 15.04.2020

Joseph Marangu

https://doi.org/10.29187/jscmt.2020.43

Cited By: 17

Abstract

Prediction of strength in cement based materials is vital in construction industry as it forms the basis upon which important
tasks can be performed such as the time for mortar form removal, project scheduling and quality control among others. The
paper reports both experimental and simulated findings on compressive strength of laboratory prepared blended cement
mortars. The blended cement was prepared by blending calcined clays with Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) at replacement
levels ranging from 35% to 50% by mass of OPC. In the experimental approach, mortars measuring 160 mm x 40 mm x 40
mm were cast using the blended cement at a water to cement (w/c) ratio of 0.40, 0.50 and 0.60 separately and cured for 2, 7
and 28 days in a laboratory set-up. Compressive strength measurements were taken at each of the curing ages. Part of the
experimental data obtained was used to train both Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)
models while the other was used in validation of the models. The trained models were used to predict the 28 day compressive
strengths at w/c of 0.35 and 0.65 and also at a cement replacement of greater than 50% and also less than 35 %. The results
showed that in training and testing, ANN exhibited stronger potential for predicting compressive strength at w/c of 0.35 and
w/c of 0.65 than SVM. In addition, ANN was further found to give more accurate prediction of compressive strength than
SVM at all the percentage replacement ranging from 0-60 % with calcined clays. In conclusion, the testing performance of
both SVM and ANN was 0.88 and 0.95 respectively.

Keywords

Artificial Neural Network, Blended Calcined Clay, Cement, Compressive Strength, Pozzolana, Support Vector Machine

References

• 1. Electrical Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Saudi Arabia, K. O. Akande, T. O. Owolabi, S. Twaha, and S. O. Olatunji, “Performance Comparison of SVM and ANN in Predicting Compressive Strength of Concrete,” IOSRJCE, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 88–94, 2014.
• 2. K. Kersting, “Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence: Two Fellow Travelers on the Quest for Intelligent Behavior in Machines,” Front. Big Data, vol. 1, p. 6, Nov. 2018.
• 3. N. R. Washburn, A. Menon, C. M. Childs, B. Poczos, and K. E. Kurtis, “Machine Learning Approaches to Admixture Design for Clay-Based Cements,” in Calcined Clays for Sustainable Concrete, vol. 16, F. Martirena, A. Favier, and K. Scrivener, Eds. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2018, pp. 488–493.
• 4. A. Voulodimos, N. Doulamis, A. Doulamis, and E. Protopapadakis, “Deep Learning for Computer Vision: A Brief Review,” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, vol. 2018, pp. 1–13, 2018.
• 5. M. A. Anusuya and S. K. Katti, “Speech Recognition by Machine: A Review,” vol. 6, no. 3, p. 25, 2009.
• 6. D. W. Otter, J. R. Medina, and J. K. Kalita, “A Survey of the Usages of Deep Learning in Natural Language Processing,” arXiv:1807.10854 [cs], Jul. 2018.
• 7. A. Baldominos, I. Blanco, A. J. Moreno, R. Iturrarte, Ó. Bernárdez, and C. Afonso, “Identifying Real Estate Opportunities using Machine Learning,” Applied Sciences, vol. 8, no. 11, p. 2321, Nov. 2018.
• 8. P. F. S. Silva and G. F. Moita, “A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Compressive Strength of Concrete,” presented at the The 4th World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering, 2019.
• 9. M. J. Mwiti, T. J. Karanja, and W. J. Muthengia, “Properties of activated blended cement containing high content of calcined clay,” Heliyon, vol. 4, no. 8, p. e00742, Aug. 2018.
• 10. A. M. Neville, Properties of concrete, 4th and final ed., reprint. Harlow, Essex: Longman, 1997.
• 11. H. Chen, C. Qian, C. Liang, and W. Kang, “An approach for predicting the compressive strength of cement-based materials exposed to sulfate attack,” PLoS ONE, vol. 13, no. 1, p. e0191370, Jan. 2018.
• 12. D. Dao, H.-B. Ly, S. Trinh, T.-T. Le, and B. Pham, “Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Prediction of Compressive Strength of Geopolymer Concrete,” Materials, vol. 12, no. 6, p. 983, Mar. 2019.
• 13. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, N. B. Siraj, A. R. Fayek, and A. A. Tsehayae, “Development and Optimization of Artificial Intelligence-Based Concrete Compressive Strength Predictive Models,” IJSCER, 2016.