Investigation of İstanbul Kartal Example within the scope of urban transformation

Year 2021, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 95 - 100, 30.09.2021

Yusuf Öz Mehmet Fatih Altan

https://doi.org/10.29187/jscmt.2021.65

Abstract

Due to the increasing migration from rural to urban areas in the world from past to present for
various reasons, cities need to be renewed and transformed in future times with the irregular
construction occurring in the cities. In this direction, States develop and implement urban
transformation policies with various methods. In the study, the logic of urban transformation
is discussed with definitions and the progress of urban transformation in history is mentioned
with which aims and methods are carried out. In addition, the data obtained in the incident
that occurred with the collapse of a building in Kartal district of Istanbul province in 2019
were mentioned and the construction in the area in question was discussed.

Keywords

Experimental, reserve building area, risky area, risky structures, urban transformation

References

• 1. Atkinson, R., & Moon, G. (1994). Urban policy in Britain: The city, the state and the market. Macmillan International Higher Education.
• 2. Force, G. B. U. T., & Rogers, R. G. (1999). Towards an urban renaissance. Routledge.
• 3. Alparslan, T., Kanal, G. (2017). Kentsel Dönüşüm, [Online]. https://www.makaleler.com/kentsel-donusum-2-3 (24 September 2017)
• 4. Gazette, O. (2012). Afet riski altındaki alanların dönüştürülmesine ilişkin kanun (The law regarding transformation of areas under disaster risks).
• 5. Özer, Y. E. Yönten, A. ve Yılmaz, F.. (2013). Afet Riski Taşıyan Bölgelerdeki Kentsel Dönüşüm Uygulamalarında Sosyo Beşeri Faktörlerin İncelenmesi Üzerine Bir Çalışma: Uzundere Toki Dayanışma ve Yardımlaşma Derneği Örneği. 8. Kamu Yönetimi Sempozyumu, Hatay, http://kisi.deu.edu.tr/yunusemre.ozer/KENTSEL%20DONUSUM.pdf, (11.05.2015)
• 6. Keating, M. (1993). The politics of economic development: political change and local development policies in the United States, Britain, and France. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 28(3), 373-396.
• 7. Atkinson, R. (2005). Kentsel Dönüşüm, Ortaklıklar ve Yerel Katılım: İngiltere Deneyimi, D: Özdemir, P. Özden ve S.Turgut (ed), Uluslararası Kentsel Dönüşüm Uygulamaları Sempozyumu, Küçükçekmece Belediyesi Yayınları s. 87-98.
• 8. Lees, L. (2003). Vision of urban renaissance: the Urban Task Force report and the Urban White Paper, R. Imrie ve M. Raco (ed), Urban Renaissance New Labour, Community and Urban Policy, The Policy Presss, Bristol.
• 9. Tekeli, İ. (2010). Türkiye’nin Kent Planlama ve Kent Araştırmaları Tarihi Yazıları, Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, İstanbul.
• 10. Gazette, O. (1966). Law No. 775 on the Anti-squatting, No: 12362.
• 11. Görgülü, A. Z. (1993). Hisseli bölüntü ile oluşan alanlarda yasallaştırmanın kentsel mekana etkileri. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi-Mimarlık Fakültesi.
• 12. Kentsel Dönüşüm. (2019) [Online]. http://www.arkitera.com/g67-kentsel-donusum.html?year=&aID=792 (19 March 2019).
• 13. Roberts, P. (2000). The evolution, definition and purpose of urban regeneration. Urban regeneration, 9-36.