Filipin inşaat sektörü için mevcut inşaat ve yıkım atığı yönetimi stratejileri – Sistematik bir literatür taraması

Year 2023, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 66 - 77, 31.03.2023

Erold Dimaculangan

https://doi.org/10.47481/jscmt.1252591

Cited By: 1

Abstract

İnşaat sektörü, bir ülkenin ekonomik ilerlemesinin ana itici güçlerinden biri olmaya devam ediyor. 2022 itibariyle, Filipinler'in inşaat sektörü yıllık %9,2'lik bir büyüme oranına sahipti ve Build! sayesinde artmaya devam ediyor. İnşa etmek! İnşa etmek! (BBB) ​​programı. Bununla birlikte, inşaat sektörü, dünya çapında düzenli olarak daha fazla ham madde tüketmesiyle, doğal kaynak kıtlığına ve çevresel etkilere yol açmasıyla tanınmaktadır. İnşaat faaliyetleri ayrıca inşaat, yıkım ve yenilemeden kaynaklanan büyük miktarda inşaat atığı üretmiştir. İnşaat ve yıkım atıkları (CDW) yönetimi stratejilerini ve politikalarını inşaatın tüm aşamalarında empoze etme ihtiyacı, daha sürdürülebilir bir inşaatın elde edilmesinde çok önemlidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, mevcut CDW yönetimi uygulamalarını ve politikalarını mevcut literatürden keşfetmektir. Bu araştırmanın bulguları, Filipinler'in daha sürdürülebilir inşaat oluşturmak için benimseyebileceği çok sayıda potansiyel strateji ve çözüm sunacak ve aynı zamanda sürdürülebilir inşaatın elde edilmesinde çevresel sorunlar ve endişelerle mücadeleye yardımcı olacaktır. Çalışma, CDW yönetimindeki en iyi uygulamaları ve güncel eğilimleri elde etmek için CDW yönetimindeki ilgili çalışmaları belirlemek için bir Sistematik Literatür Taraması (SLR) kullanacaktır. Çalışmanın bulguları, inşaat sektöründe en az 26 farklı stratejinin uygulandığını göstermektedir. Bunlar, bilgi teknolojisi, politika, tasarım, operasyonlar, bilgi ve tedarik temelli olmak üzere 6 ana grupta toplanabilir.

Keywords

CDWM, Yapı sektörü, atık Yönetimi

Current construction and demolition waste management strategies for Philippine construction sector – A systematic literature review

Abstract

The construction industry continues to be one of the primary drivers of a country's economic
progress. As of 2022, the Philippines’ construction sector had an annual growth rate of 9.2%
and continues to increase due to the Build! Build! Build! (BBB) program. However, the construction sector is globally known for regularly consuming more raw materials, resulting in
natural resource scarcity and environmental implications. Construction activities also generated a massive volume of construction waste from construction, demolition, and renovation.
The need to impose construction and demolition waste (CDW) management strategies and
policies in all stages of construction is crucial in attaining a more sustainable construction.
This study aims to explore the current CDW management practices and policies from existing
literature. The findings of this research will present many potential strategies and solutions that
the Philippines can adopt to create more sustainable construction while also assisting in combating environmental issues and concerns in attaining sustainable construction. The study will
utilize a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to identify relevant studies in CDW management
to gain the best practices and current trends in CDW management. The study's findings show
that at least 26 strategies have been implemented in the construction industry. These can be
grouped into 6 major groups: information technology, policy, design, operations, knowledge,
and procurement based.

Keywords

CDWM, construction industry, waste management, Yapı sektörü, atık Yönetimi

References

• [1] Philippine Statistics Authority. (2022, October 5). Construction statistics from approved building per mits, first quarter 2022. https://psa.gov.ph/content/ construction-statistics-approved-building-per mits-first-quarter-2022
• [2] Congressional Policy and Budget Research De partment (CPBRD). (2020). The New Build! Build! Build! (BBB) Program.https://cpbrd.congress.gov. ph/images/PDF%20Attachments/CPBRD%20 Notes/CN2020-02_BBB_Revised.pdf
• [3] Kukah, A. S., Jnr, A. V. K. B., & Opoku, A. (2022). Strategies to reduce the impact of resource con sumption in the Ghanaian construction industry. International Journal of Real Estate, 16(1), 51–59. [CrossRef]
• [4] Kulatunga, U., Amaratunga, D., Haigh, R., & Ra meezdeen, R. (2006). Attitudes and perceptions of construction workforce on construction waste in Sri Lanka. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 17(1), 57–72. [CrossRef]
• [5] Pacheco-Torgal, F., Cabeza, L. F., Labrincha, J., De Magalhaes, A. G., & De Magalhaes, A. G. (Eds.). (2014). Eco-efficient construction and building mate rials: Life cycle assessment (LCA), Eco-labelling and case studies. Elsevier.
• [6] Chen, Z., Feng, Q., Yue, R., Chen, Z., Moselhi, O., Soliman, A., Hammad, A., & An, C. (2022). Con struction, renovation, and demolition waste in landfill: a review of waste characteristics, environ mental impacts, and mitigation measures. Envi ronmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(31), 46509–46526. [CrossRef]
• [7] Department of Environment and Natural Resourc es (DENR). (2018). National Solid Waste Manage ment Status Report [2008 -2018]. https://emb.gov. ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/National-Sol id-Waste-Management-Status-Report-2008-2018. Pdf
• [8] Coracero, E. E., Gallego, R. J., Frago, K. J. M., & Gonzales, R. J. R. (2021). A long-standing problem: a review on the solid waste management in the Phil ippines. Indonesian Journal of Social and Environ mental Issues, 2(3), 213–220. [CrossRef]
• [9] Jalaei, F., Zoghi, M., & Khoshand, A. (2021). Life cycle environmental impact assessment to manage and optimize construction waste using Building In formation Modeling (BIM). International Journal of Construction Management, 21(8), 784–801. [CrossRef]
• [10] Ali, T. H., Akhund, M. A., Memon, N. A., Memon, A. H., Imad, H. U., & Khahro, S. H. (2019). Appli cation of artificial intelligence in construction waste management. International conference industrial technology and management (pp. 50–55). IEEE. [CrossRef]
• [11] El-Haggar, S. M. (2007). Sustainability of construc tion and demolition waste management. In S. L. El-Haggar (Ed.), Sustainable industrial design and waste management (pp. 261–292). Elsevier. [CrossRef]
• [12] Al-Ansary, M. S., El-Haggar, S. M., & Taha, M. A. (2004). Proposed guidelines for construction waste management in Egypt for sustainability of construc tion industry. In Proceedings on International Conference on Sustainable Construction Waste Manage ment.
• [13] Republic of the Philippines. (1977, June 6). Phil ippine environment code. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.offi cialgazette.gov.ph/1977/06/06/presidential-de cree-no-1152-s-1977/
• [14] Republic of the Philippines. (2001, January 26). Congress of the Philippines Metro Manila. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https:// www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2001/01/26/republic act-no-9003-s-2001/
• [15] National Solid Waste Management Commission. (2004). National solid waste management frame work. https://nswmc.emb.gov.ph/wp-content/up loads/2017/11/NSWMC-FRAMEWORK-PDF.pdf
• [16] National Solid Waste Management Commission. (2011). National solid waste management strategy 2011-2016. https://nswmc.emb.gov.ph/wp-content/ uploads/2016/07/NSWM-Strategy-2012-2016.pdf
• [17] House of Representatives. (2020). House Bill No. 7044. https://hrep-website.s3.ap-southeast-1.ama zonaws.com/legisdocs/basic_18/HB07044.pdf
• [18] Ma, M., Tam, V. W., Le, K. N., Zhu, Y., & Li, W. (2019). Comparative analysis of national policies on construction and demolition waste management in China and Japan. In G. Ye, H. Yuan, & J. Zuo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th international symposium on advancement of construction management and real estate (pp. 1543–1558). Springer. [CrossRef]
• [19] Huang, B., Wang, X., Kua, H. W., Geng, Y., Bleischwitz, R., & Ren, J. (2018). Construction and demolition waste management in China through the 3R principle. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 129, 36–44. [CrossRef]
• [20] Sáez, P. V., & Osmani, M. (2019). A diagnosis of construction and demolition waste generation and recovery practice in the European Union. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, Article 118400.
• [21] Rodríguez, G., Medina, C., Alegre, F., Asensio, E., & De Rojas, M. S. (2015). Assessment of construction and demolition waste plant management in Spain: in pursuit of sustainability and eco-efficiency. Jour nal of Cleaner Production, 90, 16–24. [CrossRef]
• [22] Aslam, M. S., Huang, B., & Cui, L. (2020). Review of construction and demolition waste management in China and USA. Journal of Environmental Manage ment, 264, Article 110445. [CrossRef]
• [23] Zhao, X., Webber, R., Kalutara, P., Browne, W. R., & Pienaar, J. (2022). Construction and demolition waste management in Australia: A mini-review. Waste Management & Research, 40(1), 34–46. [CrossRef]
• [24] Aarseth, W., Ahola, T., Aaltonen, K., Økland, A., & Andersen, B. (2017). Project sustainability strategies: a systematic literature review. Inter national Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1071–1083. [CrossRef]
• [25] Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Report No. EBSE 2007-001). Keele Uni versity and Durham University.
• [26] Bakchan, A., Faust, K. M., & Leite, F. (2019). Sev en-dimensional automated construction waste quantification and management framework: inte gration with project and site planning. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 146, 462–474.
• [27] Guerra, B., Leite, F., & Faust, K. M. (2020). 4D-BIM to enhance construction waste reuse and recy cle planning: case studies on concrete and drywall waste streams. Waste Management, 116, 79–90.
• [28] Jain, S., Singhal, S., & Pandey, S. (2020). Environ mental life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste recycling: a case of urban India. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 155, Article 104642.
• [29] Lam, P. T. I., Yu, A. T. W., Wu, Z., & Poon, C. S. (2019). Methodology for upstream estimation of construction waste for new building projects. Jour nal of Cleaner Production, 230, 1003–1012. [CrossRef]
• [30] Porwal, A., & Hewage, K. N. (2012). Building In formation Modeling–based analysis to minimize waste rate of structural reinforcement. Journal of the Construction Division and Management, 138(8), 943–954. [CrossRef]
• [31] Hao, L., Hill, M. J., & Shen, L. Y. (2008). Managing construction waste on‐site through system dynam ics modelling: the case of Hong Kong. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 15(2), 103–113. [CrossRef]
• [32] Li, C. Z., Zhao, Y., Xiao, B., Yu, B., Tam, V. W., Chen, Z., & Ya, Y. (2020). Research trend of the application of information technologies in construction and demolition waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, Article 121458. [CrossRef]
• [33] Llatas, C., Bizcocho, N., Soust-Verdaguer, B., Mon tes, M. V., & Quiñones, R. (2021). An LCA-based model for assessing prevention versus non-preven tion of construction waste in buildings. Waste Man agement, 126, 608–622. [CrossRef]
• [34] Ruiz, L. A. L., Ramón, X. R., & Domingo, S. G. (2020). The circular economy in the construction and demolition waste sector – a review and an inte grative model approach. Journal of Cleaner Produc tion, 248, Article 119238. [CrossRef]
• [35] Ekanayake, L. L., & Ofori, G. (2004). Building waste assessment score: design-based tool. Building and Environment, 39(7), 851–861. [CrossRef]
• [36] Esa, M. R., Halog, A., & Rigamonti, L. (2017). Strat egies for minimizing construction and demolition wastes in Malaysia. Resources Conservation and Re cycling, 120, 219–229. [CrossRef]
• [37] Li, Y., & Zhang, X. (2012). Comparison and analy sis of international construction waste management policies. In H. C, A. Kandil, M. H, P. S. Dunston (Eds.), Construction research congress 2012: Con struction challenges in a flat world. (pp. 1672-1681). American Society of Civil Engineers. [CrossRef]
• [38] Yu, A. T. W., Poon, C. S., Wong, A., Yip, R., & Jaillon, L. (2013). Impact of construction waste disposal charging scheme on work practices at construction sites in Hong Kong. Waste Management, 33(1), 138–146. [CrossRef]
• [39] Kim, S., Nguyen, M. T., & Luu, V. T. (2020). A per formance evaluation framework for construction and demolition waste management: stakeholder perspectives. Engineering, Construction and Archi tectural Management, 27(10), 3189–3213. [CrossRef]
• [40] Li, J., Yao, Y., Zuo, J., & Li, J. (2020). Key policies to the development of construction and demolition waste recycling industry in China. Waste Manage ment, 108, 137–143. [CrossRef]
• [41] Mahpour, A., & Mortaheb, M. M. (2018). Finan cial-based incentive plan to reduce construction waste. Journal of the Construction Division and Man agement, 144(5), Article 04018029. [CrossRef]
• [42] Galvez-Martos, J., Styles, D., Schoenberger, H., & Zeschmar-Lahl, B. (2018). Construction and dem olition waste best management practice in Europe. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 136, 166– 178. [CrossRef]
• [43] Ahmadian, F. F. A., Rashidi, T. H., Akbarnezhad, A., & Waller, S. T. (2017). BIM-enabled sustainability assessment of material supply decisions. Engineer ing, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(4), 668–695. [CrossRef]
• [44] Esin, T., & Cosgun, N. (2007). A study conducted to reduce construction waste generation in Turkey. Build ing and Environment, 42(4), 1667–1674. [CrossRef]
• [45] Olanrewaju, S. D., & Ogunmakinde, O. (2020). Waste minimisation strategies at the design phase: architects’ response. Waste Management, 118, 323– 330. [CrossRef]
• [46] Hamid, Z. A., & Kamar, K. A. M. (2012). Aspects of off‐site manufacturing application towards sus tainable construction in Malaysia. Construction In novation: Information, Process, Management, 12(1), 4–10. [CrossRef]
• [47] Lachimpadi, S. K., Pereira, J. J., Taha, M. R., & Mokhtar, M. (2012). Construction waste minimisa tion comparing conventional and precast construc tion (Mixed System and IBS) methods in high-rise buildings: A Malaysia case study. Resources Conser vation and Recycling, 68, 96–103.
• [48] Lu, W., Lee, W. M., Xue, F., & Xu, J. (2021). Revis iting the effects of prefabrication on construction waste minimization: a quantitative study using big ger data. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 170, Article 105579. [CrossRef]
• [49] Tam, V. W., & Hao, J. L. (2014). Prefabrication as a mean of minimizing construction waste on site. International Journal of Construction Management, 14(2), 113–121. [CrossRef]
• [50] Ajayi, S. O., & Oyedele, L. O. (2018). Critical design factors for minimising waste in construction projects: a structural equation modelling approach. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 137, 302–313. [CrossRef]
• [51] Zhang, C., Hu, M., Yang, X., Miranda-Xicotencatl, B., Sprecher, B., Di Maio, F., Zhong, X., & Tukker, A. (2020). Upgrading construction and demolition waste management from downcycling to recycling in the Netherlands. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, Article 121718. [CrossRef]
• [52] Ramani, P. V., & Ksd, L. K. L. (2021). Application of lean in construction using value stream mapping. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Man agement, 28(1), 216–228. [CrossRef]
• [53] Rosli, M. K., Tamyez, P. F. M., & Zahari, A. R. (2023). The effects of suitability and acceptability of lean principles in the flow of waste management on con struction project performance. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(1), 1–27. [CrossRef]
• [54] Udawatta, N., Zuo, J., Chiveralls, K., & Zillante, G. (2015). Improving waste management in construc tion projects: an Australian study. Resources Conser vation and Recycling, 101, 73–83. [CrossRef]
• [55] Bao, Z., Lu, W., Chi, B., Yuan, H., & Hao, J. (2019). Procurement innovation for a circular economy of construction and demolition waste: lessons learnt from Suzhou, China. Waste Management, 99, 12– 21. [CrossRef]
• [56] Ghaffar, S. H., Burman, M., & Braimah, N. (2020). Pathways to circular construction: an integrated management of construction and demolition waste for resource recovery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, Article 118710. [CrossRef]
• [57] Ahmed, R. E., & Zhang, X. (2021). Multi-layer val ue stream assessment of the reverse logistics net work for inert construction waste management. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 170, Article 105574. [CrossRef]
• [58] Correia, J. A., De Oliveira Neto, G. C., Leite, R. R., & Da Silva, D. (2021). Plan to overcome barriers to re verse logistics in construction and demolition waste: survey of the construction industry. Journal of the Construction Division and Management, 147(2). Ar ticle 04020172. [CrossRef]
• [59] Lu, W., & Yuan, H. (2012). Off-site sorting of con struction waste: what can we learn from Hong Kong? Resources Conservation and Recycling, 69, 100–108. [CrossRef]
• [60] Wang, J., Yuan, H., Kang, X., & Lu, W. (2010). Criti cal success factors for on-site sorting of construction waste: a China study. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 54(11), 931–936. [CrossRef]
• [61] Yuan, H. (2013). A SWOT analysis of successful construction waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, 1–8. [CrossRef]
• [62] Ruiz, L. A. L., Ramón, X. R., & Domingo, S. G. (2020). The circular economy in the construction and demolition waste sector – a review and an inte grative model approach. Journal of Cleaner Produc tion, 248, Article 119238. [CrossRef]
• [63] Wang, H., Pan, X., Zhang, S., & Zhang, P. (2021). Simulation analysis of implementation effects of construction and demolition waste disposal policies. Waste Management, 126, 684–693. [CrossRef]
• [64] Porwal, A., Parsamehr, M., Szostopal, D., Ruparath na, R., & Hewage, K. (2020). The integration of building information modeling (BIM) and system dynamic modeling to minimize construction waste generation from change orders. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(1), 1–20. [CrossRef]