Sustainability Evaluation of Highway Sign Support by Field Testing and Finite Element Analysis

Year 2024, Volume: 9 Issue: 4, 305 - 314, 31.12.2024

Talat Salama , Drew Voghel

https://doi.org/10.47481/jscmt.1607459

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the sustainability of highway sign supports through field testing and finite element analysis. The study aims to develop a predictive maintenance model to evaluate the service life of these structures. Sign support systems are important structures in the Connecticut Department of Transportation (CTDOT) bridge management system. Periodic sustainability inspections and maintenance activities are needed as a long-term, cost-effective maintenance strategy. The research involved non-destructive field testing of a cantilever-type highway sign support, followed by finite element modeling using Highway Sign Structures Engineering (HSE) by SAFI software. Data from accelerometers, strain gauges, and anemometers were collected and analyzed to validate the model. The experimental setup was done in collaboration with CTDOT. The data was collected and analyzed, and it was used
to verify the three-dimensional finite element (FE) model developed, which was used to test the structure's design capacity. The study found that the sign support structure experienced significant wind loading on a few occasions, with stress levels reaching about 20% of its elastic
limit. The finite element model accurately predicted structural behavior under design load conditions, demonstrating its potential for predictive maintenance applications.

Keywords

Highway Sign Supports, Field Test, Finite Element Analysis

References

• 1. Fortier, M. (2022). Large highway sign falls right onto I-190 in Worcester. https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/large-highway-sign-falls-right-onto-i-190-in-worcester/2803359/
• 2. McGee, H. W. (2010). Maintenance of signs and sign supports: A guide for local highway and street maintenance personnel. Office of Safety, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Report No. FHWA-SA-09-025.
• 3. Tuhin, I. A. (2020). Structural behavior of long span overhead sign support bridges. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 10(1), 1-8. CrossRef
• 4. Patel, P. P. (2024). Design of highway sign supporting structures with various structural systems. Recent Developments in Structural Engineering, 4, 349-357. CrossRef
• 5. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2022). Interim revisions to the standard specifications for structural supports for highway signs, luminaires, and traffic signals, 6th ed. LRFDLTS-1-I5.
• 6. Connecticut Department of Transportation (CT-DOT). (2022). Highway transportation asset management. https://portal.ct.gov/dot/bureaus/engineering-and-construction/project-administration/asset-management
• 7. Federal Highway Administration. (2020). Transportation asset management plans case study 7 - managing assets beyond pavements and bridges. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/asset/pubs/hif20067_case7.pdf
• 8. Zaffetti, R. P. (2018). Bridge Safety and Evaluation Bridge Safety Memo 2018-02 In-Depth Inspections. Connecticut Department of Transportation Office of Engineering.
• 9. Fouad, F. H., Davidson, J. S., Delatte, N., Calvert, E. A., Chen, S. E., Nunez, E., & Abdalla, R. (2003). NCHRP Report 494 structural supports for highway signs, luminaries, and traffic signals. Transportation Research Board.
• 10. Wisconsin Department of Transportation. (2021). Structural inspection manual: Ancillary structures - overhead sign structures and supports. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/pubs/nhi20999.pdf
• 11. Wisconsin Department of Transportation. LRFD standardized overhead sign structure plans. https://wisconsindot.gov/Pages/doing-bus/eng-consultants/cnslt-rsrces/strct/standard-sign-plans.aspx
• 12. Nebraska Department of Roads Materials and Research Division. (2008). Inspection guide for the installation of high mast lighting and sign structures. https://dot.nebraska.gov/media/maolwhfi/ndor-inspection-guide-for-installation-of-towers-and-signs.pdf
• 13. Gilani, A., & Whittaker, A. (2000). Fatigue-life evaluation of steel post structures. I: Background and analysis. Journal of Structural Engineering, 126(3), 322-330. CrossRef
• 14. Minnesota Department of Transportation. (2019). Highway transportation asset management. https://www.dot.state.mn.us/assetmanagement/tamp.html
• 15. Hensing, D. J., & Rowshan, S. (2005). Roadway safety hardware asset management systems case studies. Federal Highway Administration, Office of Safety Research and Development.
• 16. Kipp, M. A., Ehsani, M. R., & Bjorhovde, R. (1987). Field testing of highway sign support structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 113(4), 850-863. CrossRef
• 17. Barle, J., Grubisic, V., & Vlak, F. (2011). Failure analysis of the highway sign structure and the design improvement. Engineering Failure Analysis, 18(3), 1076-1084. CrossRef
• 18. Yang, J., Culmo, M. P., & Dewolf, J. T. (2004). Stability analysis of truss type highway sign support structures. Wind and Structures, 7(6), 393-404. CrossRef
• 19. Ehsani, M. R., & Bjorhovde, R. (1988). Behavior of monotube highway sign support structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 114(12), 2755-2772. CrossRef
• 20. Al Shboul, K. W., Rasheed, H. A., & Alshareef, H. A. (2021). Intelligent approach for accurately predicting fatigue damage in overhead highway sign structures. Structures, 34, 3453-3463. CrossRef
• 21. De Barros, R. C., & Paiva, F. (2018). Seismic and wind response control of cantilevered highway sign support using a TMD. In 2018 13th APCA International Conference on Automatic Control and Soft Computing (CONTROLO) (pp. 368-373). IEEE. CrossRef
• 22. Miller, S., Scott, P., Cooper, S., Brown, P., Ingram, P., & Chalmers, H. (2012). Road asset management systems. In Proceedings of the IET & IAM Asset Management Conference, London, UK. CrossRef
• 23. Harris, E. A., Rasdorf, W., Hummer, J. E., & Yeom, C. (2007). Analysis of traffic sign asset management scenarios. Transportation Research Record, 1993(1), 9-15. CrossRef
• 24. Kruse, B. K., & Simmer, T. (2003). Asset management of roadway signs through advanced technology. North Dakota State University.