“Gölge İttifakların Yükselişi: İttifak Sonrası Dünyada Enformel Güvenlik İşbirliği”

Abstract

Resmî ittifakların giderek daha fazla sorgulandığı ve çok taraflı çerçevelerin aşınma belirtileri gösterdiği bir dünyada, devletler güvensizlikle başa çıkmak için sessizce yeni yollar geliştirmektedir. Bu makale, antlaşmalar, kurumlar ya da kamu denetimi olmadan işleyen gayriresmî güvenlik düzenlemeleri olan gölge ittifaklar kavramını ortaya koymaktadır. Bu ittifaklar, bunun yerine kişiselleştirilmiş diplomasiye, stratejik muğlaklığa ve inkâr edilebilir işbirliğine dayanmaktadır. Türkiye–Katar, Rusya–Afrika, İsrail–Körfez ve ABD–Hindistan–Japonya ekseni olmak üzere dört farklı vakayı inceleyerek, bu çalışma, parçalanmış küresel düzende gayriresmî ortaklıkların nasıl etkili nüfuz ve hayatta kalma araçlarına dönüştüğünü göstermektedir. Nitel karşılaştırmalı bir yöntem kullanarak ve dengeleme stratejisi (hedging), ağ temelli güvenlik ve yeni-klasik realizm teorilerinden yararlanarak makale, bu ittifakların yapısal ve normatif özelliklerini haritalandırmaktadır. Bulgular, gölge ittifakların geçici çözümler değil, hem sistemik baskıları hem de rejimlere özgü ihtiyaçları yansıtan uzun vadeli stratejiler olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bu ittifaklar esneklik ve hızlı tepki kapasitesi sunsa da, aynı zamanda ciddi sorunlar da doğurmaktadır: hesap verebilirliğin zayıflaması, özel askerî aktörlerin rolü ve küresel güvenlik yönetişiminde kurumsal normların gerilemesi. Makale, ittifak teorisi etrafında, dünya siyasetinin gri alanlarında ortaya çıkan gayriresmî işbirliğini hesaba katacak yeni bir akademik tartışma çağrısı yapmaktadır. Ayrıca, gölge ittifakların yarattığı hukukî ve etik boşlukları ele almak üzere politika çerçeveleri önermektedir.

Keywords

• Gölge İttifaklar
• Gayriresmi Güvenlik
• stratejik Belirsizlik
• denge siyaseti
• küresel düzen

THE RISE OF SHADOW ALLIANCES: INFORMAL SECURITY COOPERATION IN A POST-ALLIANCE WORLD

Abstract

In a world where formal alliances are increasingly questioned and multilateral frameworks show signs of erosion, states are quietly forging new paths to manage insecurity. This article introduces the concept of shadow alliances—informal security arrangements that operate without treaties, institutions, or public oversight. These alliances rely instead on personalized diplomacy, strategic ambiguity, and deniable cooperation. By examining four distinct cases—Turkey–Qatar, Russia–Africa, Israel–Gulf, and the U.S.–India–Japan axis—this study traces how informal partnerships have become functional tools of influence and survival in a fragmented global order. Using a qualitative comparative method and drawing from theories of hedging, networked security, and neoclassical realism, the article maps the structural and normative features of these alliances. The findings show that shadow alliances are not temporary fixes but long-term strategies that reflect both systemic pressures and regime-specific needs. While they offer flexibility and responsiveness, they also raise critical concerns: the erosion of accountability, the role of private military actors, and the decline of institutional norms in global security governance. The article calls for a renewed scholarly conversation around alliance theory, one that accounts for the rise of informal cooperation in the gray zones of world politics. It also proposes policy frameworks to address the legal and ethical gaps shadow alliances leave behind.

Keywords

• Shadow Alliances
• Informal Security
• Strategic Ambiguity
• Hedging
• Global Order

References

1. Acharya, A. (2014). The End of American World Order. Polity Press.
2. Bergman, R. (2021, November/December). How Wagner works: The mechanics of a Russian private military company. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia-fsu/2021-10-12/how-wagner-works
3. Chesterman, S. (2016). Secret Intelligence: A Framework for Transparency and Accountability. Oxford University Press.
4. Gause, F. G., III. (2020, October). The Gulf states and normalization with Israel. Brookings Doha Center Analysis Paper No. 24. Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/FP_20201019_gulf_israel_normalization_gause.pdf
5. George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in The Social Sciences. MIT Press.
6. Grossman, D. (2020, November 16). The Quad isn’t NATO—and it shouldn’t be. RAND Blog. https://www.rand.org/blog/2020/11/the-quad-isnt-nato-and-it-shouldnt-be.html
7. Guzansky, Y., & Marshall, Z. (2020). Israel–Gulf Relations in a New Era: From Back Channels to Strategic Alignment. Middle East Policy, 27(4), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12530
8. Haass, R. N. (2008). The Age of Nonpolarity. Foreign Affairs, 87(3), 44–56.

9. He, K. (2009). Hedging, Strategic Ambiguity, and the Sino–Japanese Security Dilemma. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 9(4), 539–568. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcp016
10. Kamrava, M. (2021). The Middle East’s Evolving Security Architecture: Power shifts and Informal Alignments. Orbis, 65(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2020.11.003
11. Kapiszewski, D., MacLean, L. M., & Read, B. L. (2015). Field Research in Political Science: Practices and Principles. Cambridge University Press.
12. Keyman, E. F. (2017). The Turkish Model Revisited: Democracy, Authoritarianism and Foreign Policy. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 19(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2016.1241196
13. Kuik, C.-C. (2008). The Essence of Hedging: Malaysia and Singapore’s Response to a Rising China. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 30(2), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs30-2a
14. Lake, D. A. (2007). Escape From the State of Nature: Authority and Hierarchy in World Politics. International Security, 32(1), 47–79. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2007.32.1.47
15. Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2020). The New Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 31(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2020.0004
16. Lind, J. M. (2019). Life in the Gray Zone: U.S. and Allies Must Adapt to Irregular Threats. Foreign Affairs, 98(2), 113–125.
17. Lobell, S. E., & Ripsman, N. M. (2010). Constructivism and Foreign Policy. S. E. Lobell, N. M. Ripsman, & J. W. Taliaferro (Eds.), Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy, pp. 65–94. Cambridge University Press.
18. Martínez, L. (2022). Russia’s Return to Africa: Wagner and the New Scramble. Mediterranean Politics, 27(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2022.2037653
19. Medcalf, R. (2020). Indo-Pacific Empire: China, America and the Contest for the World's Pivotal Region. Manchester University Press.
20. Mohan, C. R. (2021, September). From balancing to coalition-building: The evolution of India’s strategy toward China. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/09/16/from-balancing-to-coalition-building-evolution-of-india-s-strategy-toward-china-pub-85346
21. Öniş, Z., & Yılmaz, Ş. (2021). Türkiye and the Arab Spring: Between Ethics and Self-Interest. Insight Türkiye, 23(1), 29–45.
22. Pant, H. V., & Joshi, Y. (2021). India and the Indo-Pacific: Reimagining Strategic Relations. Bloomsbury India.
23. Pahre, R. (2009). Complex Path Dependence in Foreign Policy: The Case of Informal Alliances. International Studies Review, 11(3), 451–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2009.00867.x
24. Ramani, S. (2020, June 29). Russia’s African foreign policy: Strategic hedging across the continent. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/06/29/russia-s-african-foreign-policy-strategic-hedging-across-continent-pub-82136
25. Ravid, B. (2020, August 13). Behind the scenes of the Israel-UAE deal. Axios. https://www.axios.com/2020/08/13/behind-scenes-israel-uae-deal
26. Revere, E. J. R. (2022, January). U.S.–Japan–India trilateral cooperation: Strategic coordination without treaty. Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/research/u-s-japan-india-trilateral-cooperation-strategic-coordination-without-treaty/
27. Roberts, D. B. (2017). Qatar and the UAE: Exploring Divergent Responses to the Arab Spring. Middle East Journal, 71(4), 544–562. https://doi.org/10.3751/71.4.13
28. Souleimanov, E. A., & Abrahamyan, E. (2021). Russia’s Ambiguous Role in Africa: Between Security Provider and Strategic Predator. Post-Soviet Affairs, 37(3), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2020.1849245
29. Snyder, G. H. (1997). Alliance Politics. Cornell University Press.
30. Stronski, P. (2019, October 28). Late to the party: Russia’s return to Africa. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2019/10/28/late-to-party-russia-s-return-to-africa-pub-80213
31. Sukhankin, S. (2019, October 22). From ‘volunteers’ to quasi-contractors: Russia’s private military companies. The Jamestown Foundation. https://jamestown.org/program/from-volunteers-to-quasi-contractors-russias-private-military-companies/
32. Taniguchi, T. (2021). Networked Security in the Indo-Pacific: Beyond Bilateralism. Asia Policy, 16(3), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2021.0031
33. Ulutaş, U. (2013). The “Arab Spring” and Türkiye: The Rise of Soft Power. Turkish Journal of International Relations, 12(4), 1–20.
34. United Nations Security Council. (2023). Report on the Situation in the Central African Republic (S/2023/245).
35. Walt, S. M. (1987). The Origins of Alliances. Cornell University Press.
36. Way, L. A. (2015). The Limits of Autocracy. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0007
37. Yaari, E. (2015). Back Channel to Cairo: The Secret Talks that Led to Israel’s Breakthrough with the Gulf. Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
38. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
39. Yörük, E., & Eslen-Ziya, H. (2019). Türkiye's Soft Power and the Politics of Representation in the Arab World. Middle East Critique, 28(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2019.1600055