Research Article

Comparative analysis of daylight characteristics of passages located in different countries at the same latitude

Number: 064 March 30, 2026

Comparative analysis of daylight characteristics of passages located in different countries at the same latitude

Abstract

Daylight performance in architectural spaces is influenced not only by latitude but also by local climatic conditions. However, comparative studies examining daylight characteristics in similar architectural spaces located at the same latitude but in different climatic regions remain limited. This study investigates how climatic variations influence daylight performance in glass-covered passages located in cities situated at approximately the same latitude. A descriptive comparative research approach supported by daylight simulation analysis was employed. A standardized glass-covered passage model was analysed using VELUX Daylight Visualizer software for the cities of Rome, Barcelona, and Istanbul. Simulations were conducted at three different times of the day (09:00, 12:00, and 15:00) during four representative months (January, April, July, and October). The numerical results indicate that the highest illuminance levels were observed in July at 12:00, reaching values above 3000 lux on ceiling surfaces, while the lowest values occurred during winter months with higher cloud cover. The findings demonstrate that even in cities located at the same latitude, daylight performance varies significantly depending on climatic factors such as cloud cover, sunshine duration, and seasonal atmospheric conditions. The study contributes to daylight-oriented architectural design by highlighting the importance of integrating regional climatic parameters into daylight performance evaluations of glass-covered transitional spaces.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Özdamar, M., "Daylight Penetration in Atrium Spaces," MSc Thesis, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, 1998.
  2. [2] Eray, S. S. and Kutlu, İ. “Anadolu’da Selçuklu ve Osmanlı kent yapısında çarşının konumu ve mekânsal kurgusu üzerine bir irdeleme,” Kent Akademisi, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 506-517, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.35674/kent.847196.
  3. [3] Kutlu, R. “Bir tasarım öğesi olarak gün ışığı,” Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 226-233, Apr. 2019.
  4. [4] Sakarya, H. K. and Kavut, İ. E. “Afet sonrası inşa edilen mobil eğitim yapılarının incelenmesi: Baan Huay Sarn Yaw afet sonrası okulu örneği,” Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, vol. 8, (special issue), pp. 42-57, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.30785/mbud.1269465.
  5. [5] Demirci, K. and Armağan, K. “Bürolarda fiziksel ortamın düzenlenmesi ve olumsuz çevresel faktörlerin çalışanlar üzerindeki etkisi,” Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 7, pp. 1-13, Jun. 2015.
  6. [6] Erlalelitepe, İ., Aral, D. and Kazanasmaz, T. “Eğitim yapılarının doğal aydınlatma performansı açısından incelenmesi,” Megaron, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 39-51, Sep. 2011.
  7. [7] Beccali, M., Bonomolo, M., Leone, G. and Zizzo, G. "Comparison between the performances of a daylight linked control system at two different latitudes," in ISES Solar World Congress, 2019, pp. 1815-1824, doi: 10.18086/swc.2019.38.01.
  8. [8] Mavridou, T. and Doulos, L. T. "Evaluation of different roof types concerning daylight in ındustrial buildings during the ınitial design phase: Methodology and case study," Buildings, vo. 9, no. 7, pp. 170, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.3390/buildings9070170.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Interior Architecture

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 30, 2026

Submission Date

January 29, 2026

Acceptance Date

March 18, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Number: 064

APA
Kalay, T., & Kandemir, A. (2026). Comparative analysis of daylight characteristics of passages located in different countries at the same latitude. Journal of Scientific Reports-A, 064, 60-77. https://doi.org/10.59313/jsr-a.1876440
AMA
1.Kalay T, Kandemir A. Comparative analysis of daylight characteristics of passages located in different countries at the same latitude. JSR-A. 2026;(064):60-77. doi:10.59313/jsr-a.1876440
Chicago
Kalay, Turgut, and Ayşenur Kandemir. 2026. “Comparative Analysis of Daylight Characteristics of Passages Located in Different Countries at the Same Latitude”. Journal of Scientific Reports-A, nos. 064: 60-77. https://doi.org/10.59313/jsr-a.1876440.
EndNote
Kalay T, Kandemir A (March 1, 2026) Comparative analysis of daylight characteristics of passages located in different countries at the same latitude. Journal of Scientific Reports-A 064 60–77.
IEEE
[1]T. Kalay and A. Kandemir, “Comparative analysis of daylight characteristics of passages located in different countries at the same latitude”, JSR-A, no. 064, pp. 60–77, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.59313/jsr-a.1876440.
ISNAD
Kalay, Turgut - Kandemir, Ayşenur. “Comparative Analysis of Daylight Characteristics of Passages Located in Different Countries at the Same Latitude”. Journal of Scientific Reports-A. 064 (March 1, 2026): 60-77. https://doi.org/10.59313/jsr-a.1876440.
JAMA
1.Kalay T, Kandemir A. Comparative analysis of daylight characteristics of passages located in different countries at the same latitude. JSR-A. 2026;:60–77.
MLA
Kalay, Turgut, and Ayşenur Kandemir. “Comparative Analysis of Daylight Characteristics of Passages Located in Different Countries at the Same Latitude”. Journal of Scientific Reports-A, no. 064, Mar. 2026, pp. 60-77, doi:10.59313/jsr-a.1876440.
Vancouver
1.Turgut Kalay, Ayşenur Kandemir. Comparative analysis of daylight characteristics of passages located in different countries at the same latitude. JSR-A. 2026 Mar. 1;(064):60-77. doi:10.59313/jsr-a.1876440