Research Article

Characterization of 5 Different Clays Used in the Turkish Ceramic Industry and Determination of Their Mullite Formation Degrees

Number: 016 August 31, 2026
EN TR

Characterization of 5 Different Clays Used in the Turkish Ceramic Industry and Determination of Their Mullite Formation Degrees

Abstract

In this study, chemical, mineralogical and technical properties of five different clay samples (Clay 1-2-3-4-5) that are widely used in the Turkish ceramic industry were investigated and correlations between raw material properties and the final performance of fired samples were presented. Comprehensive analytical methods such as XRD, XRF, TMA, DSC, and SEM were used to characterize the clays. The findings show that drying sensitivity and sintering behavior are strongly influenced by the mineralogical composition, namely the crystallinity of kaolinite and the presence of secondary phases such illite, quartz, and alkali oxides. Between 1100 and 1300°C, clays with high crystalline kaolinite (Clay 1 and Clay 2) developed more mullite and showed greater thermal stability. Furthermore, as the particle size distribution was the primary factor influencing the drying behavior, Clay-5, with the finest particles, was appointed as the highest drying sensitive sample. According to the study, raising the firing temperature improved flexural strength by boosting mullitization and liquid phase development while decreasing porosity and water absorption in all samples.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] M. V. Vasic, O. Gencel, P. M. Velasco, “From raw clay to ceramics: Evaluating the suitability of raw materials through compositional analysis”, Boletin De La Sociedad Espanola De Ceramica y Vidrio, 64, 100455, 2025. doi.org/10.1016/j.bsecv.2025.100455
  2. [2] C. Candeias, I. Santos, F. Rocha, “Characterization and Suitability for Ceramics Production of “Clays from Bustos, Portugal”, Minerals, 15, 503, 2025. doi.org/10.3390/min15050503
  3. [3] W. M. Carty, U. Senapati, “Porcelain-Raw Materials, Processing, Phase Evolution, and Mechanical Behavior”, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 81, [1], 3-20, 1998. doi/10.111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02290.x
  4. [4] A. Aras, “The change of phase composition in kaolinite- and illite-rich clay-based ceramic bodies”, Applied Clay Science, 24, 257-269, 2004. doi:10.1016/j.clay.2003.08.012
  5. [5] M. Garcia-Valles, D. Cuevas, P. Alfonso, S. Martinez, “Thermal behaviour of ceramics obtained from the kaolinitic clays of Terra Alta, Catalonia, Spain”, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 147:5303–5312, 2022. doi.org/10.1007/s10973-021-11075-9
  6. [6] W.E. Lee, G.P. Souza, C.J. McConville, T. Tarvornpanich, Y. Iqbal, “Mullite formation in clays and clay-derived vitreous ceramics”, Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 28, 465-471, 2008. doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.03.009
  7. [7] O. Castelein, B, Soulestin, J.P. Bonnet, P. Blanchart, “The influence of heating rate on the thermal behaviour and mullite formation from a kaolin raw material”, Ceramics International, 27, 517-522, 2001.
  8. [8] G. Yan, F. Wang, Y. Yang, J. Yang, R. He, Q. Gui, H. Zhou, J. Feng, “Controlling phase transfer of recycled coal-series kaolin waste used as superior admixture”, Results in Engineering, 29, 108683, 2026. doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108683

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Ceramics in Materials Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

August 31, 2026

Submission Date

April 24, 2026

Acceptance Date

June 30, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Number: 016

APA
Cebeci Ceylantekin, M., Kaya, G., & Ceylantekin, R. (2026). Characterization of 5 Different Clays Used in the Turkish Ceramic Industry and Determination of Their Mullite Formation Degrees. Journal of Scientific Reports-B, 016, 1-18. https://izlik.org/JA43GW47PF
AMA
1.Cebeci Ceylantekin M, Kaya G, Ceylantekin R. Characterization of 5 Different Clays Used in the Turkish Ceramic Industry and Determination of Their Mullite Formation Degrees. Journal of Scientific Reports-B. 2026;(016):1-18. https://izlik.org/JA43GW47PF
Chicago
Cebeci Ceylantekin, Münire, Güray Kaya, and Rasim Ceylantekin. 2026. “Characterization of 5 Different Clays Used in the Turkish Ceramic Industry and Determination of Their Mullite Formation Degrees”. Journal of Scientific Reports-B, nos. 016: 1-18. https://izlik.org/JA43GW47PF.
EndNote
Cebeci Ceylantekin M, Kaya G, Ceylantekin R (August 1, 2026) Characterization of 5 Different Clays Used in the Turkish Ceramic Industry and Determination of Their Mullite Formation Degrees. Journal of Scientific Reports-B 016 1–18.
IEEE
[1]M. Cebeci Ceylantekin, G. Kaya, and R. Ceylantekin, “Characterization of 5 Different Clays Used in the Turkish Ceramic Industry and Determination of Their Mullite Formation Degrees”, Journal of Scientific Reports-B, no. 016, pp. 1–18, Aug. 2026, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA43GW47PF
ISNAD
Cebeci Ceylantekin, Münire - Kaya, Güray - Ceylantekin, Rasim. “Characterization of 5 Different Clays Used in the Turkish Ceramic Industry and Determination of Their Mullite Formation Degrees”. Journal of Scientific Reports-B. 016 (August 1, 2026): 1-18. https://izlik.org/JA43GW47PF.
JAMA
1.Cebeci Ceylantekin M, Kaya G, Ceylantekin R. Characterization of 5 Different Clays Used in the Turkish Ceramic Industry and Determination of Their Mullite Formation Degrees. Journal of Scientific Reports-B. 2026;:1–18.
MLA
Cebeci Ceylantekin, Münire, et al. “Characterization of 5 Different Clays Used in the Turkish Ceramic Industry and Determination of Their Mullite Formation Degrees”. Journal of Scientific Reports-B, no. 016, Aug. 2026, pp. 1-18, https://izlik.org/JA43GW47PF.
Vancouver
1.Münire Cebeci Ceylantekin, Güray Kaya, Rasim Ceylantekin. Characterization of 5 Different Clays Used in the Turkish Ceramic Industry and Determination of Their Mullite Formation Degrees. Journal of Scientific Reports-B [Internet]. 2026 Aug. 1;(016):1-18. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA43GW47PF